Quantcast

Do liberal-Democrats support Obama's socialist-Democrat goals to destroy capitalism and our way of life?

Dan 2009/11/01 18:13:04
Yes! Liberals are completely on board with Obama's socialist ambitions!
Well... only some liberals support Obama's Marxist crap.
No! Being a liberal does NOT mean support for Obama's socialism!!!
Undecided
You!
Add Photos & Videos
As a Conservative Republican, Democrats were all the same to me - until 2009. Then, I realized that there are actually two distinct types of Democrats: socialists and liberals.
Until the lunacy, waste, and destruction of President Obama, I used to think liberals were our worst problem in the U.S. I thought this for several reasons. Liberal pro-choicers murdered over 50 million unborn, white American babies (more than Hitler murdering 6 millions Jews). This is called genocide and it is the reason that white Americans will no longer be the majority in this country. Genocide (of any type) is evil - despite your political views. Then, the millions of liberal homosexuals caused an even further decimation of the white race through their inability to produce life by heterosexual sex.
Then, in 2008, millions of racially-motivated socialist-Democrats walked over the American flag and the Constitution and embraced Obama's socialist promises and bribes, like "free" health care (paid for my taxpayers, NOT Obama) and rights for the 13 million illegal immigrants ( 11.7 million from Mexico and 1.3 million originating from predominantly Muslim countries). These Obama-voters did so because they were lazy (unemployed or welfare recipients) and/or they were racists (elect the black Democrat simply because he's not a white Republican).
So, taking these facts into consideration, DO liberal-Democrats truly support Obama's vision for a Euro-socialist "United States"?
Add a comment above

Top Opinion

  • OLD CRACKER 2009/11/01 18:36:16
    Yes! Liberals are completely on board with Obama's socialist ambitions!
    OLD CRACKER
    +7
    LIBERALISM IS A RELIGION. IT IS ABOVE EVERYTHING BUT POWER, WEALTH, AND TOTAL CONTROL.

Sort By
  • Most Raves
  • Least Raves
  • Oldest
  • Newest
Opinions

  • Annie~Pro American~Pro Israel 2011/07/23 05:22:52
    Yes! Liberals are completely on board with Obama's socialist ambitions!
    Annie~Pro American~Pro Israel
    +2
    Majority of liberals are already indoctrinated and are use to those free handouts. Exceptions to every rule though.
  • Todd Hooper 2011/07/23 05:02:56
    Yes! Liberals are completely on board with Obama's socialist ambitions!
    Todd Hooper
    +1
    Socialism is pretty great actually, you'd know that if you weren't indoctrinated with the Turner Diaries and a steady diet of Fox News for 20 years
  • Annie~P... Todd Ho... 2011/07/23 05:16:42
    Annie~Pro American~Pro Israel
    +2
    So, first, what kind of American are you? Second, why are you here? And, last, how much is George Soros paying you as you are really cocky for being brand new to SH?
  • Freedom... Todd Ho... 2011/07/23 05:25:55
    Freedom Mom
    +2
    Socialisms is slavery, second what are you up to trolling every post and making racial comments, that have been taken down?
  • HAlex1972 Freedom... 2011/07/23 06:09:14
    HAlex1972
    +5
    Fascism is slavery.
  • Freedom... HAlex1972 2011/07/23 06:12:32
    Freedom Mom
    +1
    It sure is, and we are all slaves UNITED STATES CORPORATION, uses Merritime Admirality Law against the American citizens instead of Civil Law which is soverign.
  • Largo A... Todd Ho... 2012/09/04 18:46:45
    Largo Adelaide
    +2
    Why do you prefer Socialism?
  • jjh 2010/11/25 19:35:32
    Yes! Liberals are completely on board with Obama's socialist ambitions!
    jjh
    +3
    Americans dont know the difference. Actually, our businesses are doing everything they can to destroy our jobs by outsourcing them to jobs to China and India. Rush Limbaugh and his followers believe that Americans do not deserve to be able to go to the doctor and not go broke because THAT is unamerican. However, we can "fight for freedom" in Afghanistan, Iraq, Korea and anywhere in the World because that is America's mission. Our nation is a nation at war, forever and forever. But's that's Merica for you and me. Don't bother doing something that takes care of our people at home because that's the big evil guv mint. Of course, we can spend ourself into bankrupcy cuz we's fahtin fur Freedum and da 'merican way. The jobs are still outsourced and our business considers the middle class unnecessary and too costly. Then again, I live in Limbaughland and he sits at the right hand of the Father, Ronald Reagan who can do no wrong.
  • HAlex1972 jjh 2011/07/23 06:10:16
    HAlex1972
    +4
    Triple thumbs up!
  • Johnny B. Good 2010/02/24 03:20:56
    Yes! Liberals are completely on board with Obama's socialist ambitions!
    Johnny B. Good
    +2
    You really don't have to delve too deep into the modern liberal political teachings before you begin to realize that modern liberals are an immediate danger to this country's true values. Liberals back in the early years of this country may have even brought some good ideas to the table but since the early 1900's they have been nothing but a threat to the constitution and the bill of rights. They are taking the supposed "rights" of a very small minority and inflicting very, very large taxation on the majority for "rights" that really are extremely ridiculous for the minority. Honestly, the right thing to do would be provide funding so these minorities can take a hike to countries that support such ridiculous and pointless rights. Doing this would save billions if not trillions of tax dollars and at the same time make our country a much, much, much better place to live!
  • Todd Ho... Johnny ... 2011/07/23 05:01:31
    Todd Hooper
    Guess who doesn't decide what the countries values are, and guess what aforementioned values have led to the corporate oligarchy that is widening the gap between rich and poor. Yours, silly *boops your nose*
  • Annie~P... Todd Ho... 2011/07/23 05:19:56
    Annie~Pro American~Pro Israel
    +1
    Todd, that's where you are wrong. Our founding fathers decided our country's values a couple hundred years ago. Apparently, you must have skipped class that day when it was taught.
  • crstrode 2009/11/16 17:51:55
    Yes! Liberals are completely on board with Obama's socialist ambitions!
    crstrode
    Yes, they all support his Marxist goals.

    However, most of them do so unknowingly. Katie Couric, or Oprah says Obama is 'Da Bomb', and that is good enough for most mush-brained liberals.

    Only a very small minority are actually aware of what Obama is being directed to do to this country.

    http://carlstrode.blogspot.co...

    bomb mush-brained liberals minority aware obama directed country httpcarlstrode blogspot
  • Todd Ho... crstrode 2011/07/23 05:02:25
    Todd Hooper
    A snake in the grass, pretty apt analogy for conservatives. Let me just put it out of its misery
  • The Frog Prince 2009/11/02 10:13:37
    No! Being a liberal does NOT mean support for Obama's socialism!!!
    The Frog Prince
    +1
    There is a distinct difference in a Liberal view of life and a Progressive view of life. Just as there is a difference between an Obamazoid koolaid swilling idiot and a liberal Democrat or Republican. There are liberals in both parties.
  • Southern Lady Anita 2009/11/02 04:39:17
    Yes! Liberals are completely on board with Obama's socialist ambitions!
    Southern Lady Anita
    +2
    The Liberals have been working on indoctrination of the masses and the Democratic party for a long time. It's very obvious they have achieved their goal!
    ambitions liberals working indoctrination masses democratic party obvious achieved goal
  • Dan Souther... 2009/11/02 21:44:07
    Dan
    +1
    Only of/for the under-educated who willingly accept leftist (Democrat, socialist, liberal) propaganda instead of the truth.
  • Fannie 2009/11/02 02:31:54
    Yes! Liberals are completely on board with Obama's socialist ambitions!
    Fannie
    +3
    It's all about them, and winning at all cost.
  • rockindog Fannie 2009/11/02 18:23:59 (edited)
    rockindog
    +1
    you can say that for all of Washington politicans. your noticed during election time after that you might as light a smoke and go home Washington noticed election light smoke home
  • Dan Fannie 2009/11/02 21:45:16
    Dan
    +2
    Sadly, you're right. They don;t give a damn about ruining our economy (punish the taxpayers and successful businesses to bribe Obama voters with "free" stuff that is always paid for, unwillingly, by the American taxpayer).
  • Fannie Dan 2009/11/02 22:18:47
    Fannie
    +1
    you got it.
  • Undecided
    Gยเtคг Plคאєг ( JFK Democrat )
    +2
    Almost 67 million people elected him. He has not given any rights to illegals that were not already given to them by the Regan Admin in 1985. If someone wants to be gay, that is their problem, not yours and not mine. No one walked all over the American Flag except maybe the last admin for passing the patriot act in the first place. No one elected him because he was black, that is what made it an actual victory, because he beat the odds, the truth is, no one thought he was electable because he was black. You are proving to millions of Americans that this whole thing is about race when it shouldnt be.
    Your numbers that got him elected are not adding up. almost 67 million that voted for him and you are basically saying that the lazy unemployed are what got him elected, So was Unemployement at around 50% when Bush was in Office? Am i one of these lazy Unemployed people? I am just asking since you seem to be smart in the area of why he won. Your issue on healthcare, well it is wrong, republicans have for many years trying to scare people against government run healthcare, but you forget and have you to bring to the table any facts about how bad it is in other countries, but many facts have been brought to the table about how many people love it in those other counties and would no...
    Almost 67 million people elected him. He has not given any rights to illegals that were not already given to them by the Regan Admin in 1985. If someone wants to be gay, that is their problem, not yours and not mine. No one walked all over the American Flag except maybe the last admin for passing the patriot act in the first place. No one elected him because he was black, that is what made it an actual victory, because he beat the odds, the truth is, no one thought he was electable because he was black. You are proving to millions of Americans that this whole thing is about race when it shouldnt be.
    Your numbers that got him elected are not adding up. almost 67 million that voted for him and you are basically saying that the lazy unemployed are what got him elected, So was Unemployement at around 50% when Bush was in Office? Am i one of these lazy Unemployed people? I am just asking since you seem to be smart in the area of why he won. Your issue on healthcare, well it is wrong, republicans have for many years trying to scare people against government run healthcare, but you forget and have you to bring to the table any facts about how bad it is in other countries, but many facts have been brought to the table about how many people love it in those other counties and would not have insurance like ous for nothing. I will not comment on your Abortion stance because frnakly i do not know much about it, i am sure someone will speak up because the number sounds bogus, and in that bogus number how many of those unborn where from rape victims or underage teenagers that didnt know any better or made a mistake?
    (more)
  • The Fro... Gยเtคг ... 2009/11/02 10:14:41
    The Frog Prince
    +3
    Get your facts straight. There are enough inaccuracies in your post to write a book about.
  • Gยเtคг ... The Fro... 2009/11/02 12:05:41
    Gยเtคг Plคאєг ( JFK Democrat )
    +2
    whatever you say. i can say that about this question also, prove me wrong with actual facts, not opinions
  • crstrode Gยเtคг ... 2009/11/16 17:54:20
    crstrode
    +2
    Facts?
    Socialist Liberals don't need no stinking facts!
  • Gยเtคг ... crstrode 2009/11/16 20:40:17
    Gยเtคг Plคאєг ( JFK Democrat )
    +1
    neither do lying ass republicans
  • Nanny 2009/11/01 20:32:01
    Well... only some liberals support Obama's Marxist crap.
    Nanny
    +4
    There are none on this site, but some do exist! Few and far between, but if anyone votes to kill babies, they are totally deserving of death the same way.
  • Scalded Eagle 2009/11/01 20:29:17
    Yes! Liberals are completely on board with Obama's socialist ambitions!
    Scalded Eagle
    +5
    Most Liberals cant think or fend for themselves and need to be ruled by their Gov.t, which is fine. But the problem starts when they demand their nanny state garbage gets forsed on us free thinking and self sustaining conservatives as well!!! Reagans thought on the matter!!!
  • Decided to Leave SH 2009/11/01 20:01:18
    Undecided
    Decided to Leave SH
    +3
    Liberals in general are by nature, supporters of "collective" emotionally-based thought and politics IMO.

    They have no regard for individualism, but they do not necessarily AGREE with a Socialistic, Communistic state if they could be openly honest in some cases, and weren't so ignorant of reality in others.

    It's kind of a pie-in-the-sky stance, because if individualism is destroyed the ultimate end is ALWAYS what history has undoubtedly recorded --- a gradual complete loss of freedom and living standard for everyone except the government elite.

    The sad truth is that they are so POLITICALLY motivated that they will support what they do not ultimately want as long as it destroys the individualism.

    In addition, they seem to be obsessed with "winning" the political battle as if it is a "game" of some sort. As a case in point, notice the ignorant comments of some of those Liberals since the Obama election, even here on SH, who so enthusiastically love to use the phrase "we won...get over it LOSER" --- I mean, what kind of mentality is that?...
  • Dan Decided... 2009/11/02 02:45:15 (edited)
    Dan
    +2
    Individualism is an aspect of Capitalism (individual accountability and responsibility for your own successes and fauilures in life, without blaming the government, whitie, or any other entity).
    Democrats want to perceive themselves as "victims" of something, evident by millions of black Americans still sporting the slave chains on their license plates in the US. Although a white Republican (Lincoln) ended slavery 144 years ago, the Democrat "victims" still want to be vicitms so that the Obama government will do something for them. This is called socialism and it completely removes individual accountability and responsibility.
  • HAlex1972 Decided... 2011/07/23 06:23:38
    HAlex1972
    +3
    You're last paragraph just described BOTH parties.
  • Zuggi 2009/11/01 19:11:09
    Yes! Liberals are completely on board with Obama's socialist ambitions!
    Zuggi
    +1
    Except Obama is neither socialist nor Marxist. Neither are liberals.
  • Scalded... Zuggi 2009/11/01 20:14:50
    Scalded Eagle
    +4
    What then, Mauists
  • Zuggi Scalded... 2009/11/01 20:20:27
    Zuggi
    Mao*

    No. A facetious remark regarding the little red book.
  • ack 2009/11/01 18:38:26
    Yes! Liberals are completely on board with Obama's socialist ambitions!
    ack
    +1
    Was this a rhetorical question?
  • OLD CRACKER 2009/11/01 18:36:16
    Yes! Liberals are completely on board with Obama's socialist ambitions!
    OLD CRACKER
    +7
    LIBERALISM IS A RELIGION. IT IS ABOVE EVERYTHING BUT POWER, WEALTH, AND TOTAL CONTROL.
  • ὤTṻnde΄ӂ 2009/11/01 18:27:01
    Undecided
    ὤTṻnde΄ӂ
    +2
    I'm definitely DECIDED. I decided that by your answer choices you need to go back to high school and learn what socialism and Marxism are. I feel so sorry for people who go through life blindly ignorant.
  • Dan ὤTṻnde΄ӂ 2009/11/01 18:38:47
    Dan
    +5
    But, YOU (and many like you) are the ones who support Obama. Calling me blind or ignorant makes you a hypocrite. Do you at least acknowledge that fact?
  • ὤTṻnde΄ӂ Dan 2009/11/01 18:46:54
    ὤTṻnde΄ӂ
    +1
    You need to look up the word "hypocrite" because it is obvious you don't know what it means. You just want to cry about FACTS that are shown that says Obama isn't a socialist.
    "The farther to the right they move, the stupider they become."
  • Evil 1 ὤTṻnde΄ӂ 2009/11/01 20:40:22
    Evil 1
    +2
    Main Entry: hyp·o·crite
    Pronunciation: \ˈhi-pə-ˌkrit\
    Function: noun
    Etymology: Middle English ypocrite, from Anglo-French, from Late Latin hypocrita, from Greek hypokritēs actor, hypocrite, from hypokrinesthai
    Date: 13th century
    1 : a person who puts on a false appearance of virtue or religion
    2 : a person who acts in contradiction to his or her stated beliefs or feelings
    3 : Barack Obama

    — hypocrite adjective

See Votes by State

The map above displays the winning answer by region.

News & Politics

2014/10/23 06:12:11

Hot Questions on SodaHead
More Hot Questions

More Community More Originals