Do liberal-Democrats support Obama's socialist-Democrat goals to destroy capitalism and our way of life?
Dan
2009/11/01 18:13:04
|
|
|||||
|
17 votes
|
|
65% | ||
|
2 votes
|
|
8% | ||
|
4 votes
|
|
15% | ||
|
3 votes
|
|
12% | ||
As a Conservative Republican, Democrats were all the same to me - until 2009. Then, I realized that there are actually two distinct types of Democrats: socialists and liberals.
Until the lunacy, waste, and destruction of President Obama, I used to think liberals were our worst problem in the U.S. I thought this for several reasons. Liberal pro-choicers murdered over 50 million unborn, white American babies (more than Hitler murdering 6 millions Jews). This is called genocide and it is the reason that white Americans will no longer be the majority in this country. Genocide (of any type) is evil - despite your political views. Then, the millions of liberal homosexuals caused an even further decimation of the white race through their inability to produce life by heterosexual sex.
Then, in 2008, millions of racially-motivated socialist-Democrats walked over the American flag and the Constitution and embraced Obama's socialist promises and bribes, like "free" health care (paid for my taxpayers, NOT Obama) and rights for the 13 million illegal immigrants ( 11.7 million from Mexico and 1.3 million originating from predominantly Muslim countries). These Obama-voters did so because they were lazy (unemployed or welfare recipients) and/or they were racists (elect the black Democrat simply because he's not a white Republican).
So, taking these facts into consideration, DO liberal-Democrats truly support Obama's vision for a Euro-socialist "United States"?
Until the lunacy, waste, and destruction of President Obama, I used to think liberals were our worst problem in the U.S. I thought this for several reasons. Liberal pro-choicers murdered over 50 million unborn, white American babies (more than Hitler murdering 6 millions Jews). This is called genocide and it is the reason that white Americans will no longer be the majority in this country. Genocide (of any type) is evil - despite your political views. Then, the millions of liberal homosexuals caused an even further decimation of the white race through their inability to produce life by heterosexual sex.
Then, in 2008, millions of racially-motivated socialist-Democrats walked over the American flag and the Constitution and embraced Obama's socialist promises and bribes, like "free" health care (paid for my taxpayers, NOT Obama) and rights for the 13 million illegal immigrants ( 11.7 million from Mexico and 1.3 million originating from predominantly Muslim countries). These Obama-voters did so because they were lazy (unemployed or welfare recipients) and/or they were racists (elect the black Democrat simply because he's not a white Republican).
So, taking these facts into consideration, DO liberal-Democrats truly support Obama's vision for a Euro-socialist "United States"?
Top Opinion
-
OLD CRACKER 2009/11/01 18:36:16Yes! Liberals are completely on board with Obama's socialist ambitions!
+6LIBERALISM IS A RELIGION. IT IS ABOVE EVERYTHING BUT POWER, WEALTH, AND TOTAL CONTROL.
However, most of them do so unknowingly. Katie Couric, or Oprah says Obama is 'Da Bomb', and that is good enough for most mush-brained liberals.
Only a very small minority are actually aware of what Obama is being directed to do to this country.
http://carlstrode.blogspot.co...
Your numbers that got him elected are not adding up. almost 67 million that voted for him and you are basically saying that the lazy unemployed are what got him elected, So was Unemployement at around 50% when Bush was in Office? Am i one of these lazy Unemployed people? I am just asking since you seem to be smart in the area of why he won. Your issue on healthcare, well it is wrong, republicans have for many years trying to scare people against government run healthcare, but you forget and have you to bring to the table any facts about how bad it is in other countries, but many facts have been brought to the table about how many people love it in those other counties and would no...
Your numbers that got him elected are not adding up. almost 67 million that voted for him and you are basically saying that the lazy unemployed are what got him elected, So was Unemployement at around 50% when Bush was in Office? Am i one of these lazy Unemployed people? I am just asking since you seem to be smart in the area of why he won. Your issue on healthcare, well it is wrong, republicans have for many years trying to scare people against government run healthcare, but you forget and have you to bring to the table any facts about how bad it is in other countries, but many facts have been brought to the table about how many people love it in those other counties and would not have insurance like ous for nothing. I will not comment on your Abortion stance because frnakly i do not know much about it, i am sure someone will speak up because the number sounds bogus, and in that bogus number how many of those unborn where from rape victims or underage teenagers that didnt know any better or made a mistake?
Socialist Liberals don't need no stinking facts!
They have no regard for individualism, but they do not necessarily AGREE with a Socialistic, Communistic state if they could be openly honest in some cases, and weren't so ignorant of reality in others.
It's kind of a pie-in-the-sky stance, because if individualism is destroyed the ultimate end is ALWAYS what history has undoubtedly recorded --- a gradual complete loss of freedom and living standard for everyone except the government elite.
The sad truth is that they are so POLITICALLY motivated that they will support what they do not ultimately want as long as it destroys the individualism.
In addition, they seem to be obsessed with "winning" the political battle as if it is a "game" of some sort. As a case in point, notice the ignorant comments of some of those Liberals since the Obama election, even here on SH, who so enthusiastically love to use the phrase "we won...get over it LOSER" --- I mean, what kind of mentality is that?...
Democrats want to perceive themselves as "victims" of something, evident by millions of black Americans still sporting the slave chains on their license plates in the US. Although a white Republican (Lincoln) ended slavery 144 years ago, the Democrat "victims" still want to be vicitms so that the Obama government will do something for them. This is called socialism and it completely removes individual accountability and responsibility.
No. A facetious remark regarding the little red book.
"The farther to the right they move, the stupider they become."
Pronunciation: \ˈhi-pə-ˌkrit\
Function: noun
Etymology: Middle English ypocrite, from Anglo-French, from Late Latin hypocrita, from Greek hypokritēs actor, hypocrite, from hypokrinesthai
Date: 13th century
1 : a person who puts on a false appearance of virtue or religion
2 : a person who acts in contradiction to his or her stated beliefs or feelings
3 : Barack Obama
— hypocrite adjective