Quantcast

Do Democrats care that their trophy idiot is playing kissy-face with the Russians?

FanOreilly 2012/04/01 23:20:21
Remember how the Russians are arming Syria and Iran?

Remember how the Russians have threatened free countries in Europe for decades?

Remember how the Russians have nuclear weapons pointed at us?


Do Democrats care that their trophy idiot is playing kissy-face with the Russians?

Read More: http://hotair.com/archives/2012/03/30/exciting-new...

You!
Add Photos & Videos

Top Opinion

Sort By
  • Most Raves
  • Least Raves
  • Oldest
  • Newest
Opinions

  • Quazimoto 2012/04/11 19:06:05
    Quazimoto
    +1
    Not at all. All democrats put race above country. This is why they are African Americans not American Africans.

    worthless_america
  • wildbill Quazimoto 2012/04/18 19:32:59 (edited)
    wildbill
    Only 19% of Democrats are black

    . http://www.gallup.com/poll/11...

    After virtually exterminating Native Americans for their land, and 365 years of slavery in every state, and the lynching of over 3000 black men, it is not possible to attribute racism to any political party. The last lynching of an African American was in Mobile Alabama in 1981 by the KKK. Racism is as American as apple pie.
    http://esl-bits.net/advanced-...

    http://iconicphotos.wordpress...

    Black Americans are referred to as "African Americans" because they ARE AMERICANS that came from Africa. They are not Africans. They are Americans in spite of the fact that the original Constitution considered them only 1/5th of a person.

    Italian Americans are referred to as "Italian Americans" because they are Americans that came from Italy. They are not Italians. They are Americans.

    Asian Americans are referred to as "Asian Americans" because they are Americans that came from Asia. They are not Asians. They are Americans. etc. etc.
  • Quazimoto wildbill 2012/04/21 02:56:35
    Quazimoto
    Each individual is responsible for their own actions:

    HIV
    According to a recent study published by the US Centers for Disease Control and Prevention in February 2011, “Although blacks make up only 13.6 percent of the U.S. population, they account for 50.3 percent of all diagnosed cases of HIV. Additionally, the rate of HIV diagnosis among black men is eight times that of whites and two times that of Hispanics, and the rate for black women is 19 times that of whites and four times that of Hispanics.”

    Wealth
    According to a recent study conducted by the Institute on Assets and Social Policy (IASP) at Brandeis University, “The wealth disparity between white and black households has more than quadrupled, regardless of income bracket.” Predicated on economic data from 1984 to 2007, the IASP study indicated that the average white family in the sample group held around $95,000 more in assets than the average black family. Additionally, the study found that middle-income white families have more assets (stocks, bonds, business interests, real estate other than primary residence) than do high-income black families.

    Single Mothers
    According to the most recent government figures from the US Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, “72 percent of black mothers are unwed which eclipses that of...








    &



    Each individual is responsible for their own actions:

    HIV
    According to a recent study published by the US Centers for Disease Control and Prevention in February 2011, “Although blacks make up only 13.6 percent of the U.S. population, they account for 50.3 percent of all diagnosed cases of HIV. Additionally, the rate of HIV diagnosis among black men is eight times that of whites and two times that of Hispanics, and the rate for black women is 19 times that of whites and four times that of Hispanics.”

    Wealth
    According to a recent study conducted by the Institute on Assets and Social Policy (IASP) at Brandeis University, “The wealth disparity between white and black households has more than quadrupled, regardless of income bracket.” Predicated on economic data from 1984 to 2007, the IASP study indicated that the average white family in the sample group held around $95,000 more in assets than the average black family. Additionally, the study found that middle-income white families have more assets (stocks, bonds, business interests, real estate other than primary residence) than do high-income black families.

    Single Mothers
    According to the most recent government figures from the US Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, “72 percent of black mothers are unwed which eclipses that of most other groups: 17 percent of Asians, 29 percent of whites, 53 percent of Hispanics and 66 percent of Native Americans.” To be sure, these statistics do not imply that babies born to unwed mothers will be unsuccessful or devoid of opportunities. However, the data does bespeak of the need for more fathers in the home who are involved in their child’s life.

    Secondary Education
    According to the US Department of Education, “Nearly half of the nation’s African American students attend high schools in low-income areas with dropout rates that hover in the 40-50% range.” “Dropout factories” (i.e., high schools that routinely have senior classes with 60% fewer students than their entering freshmen classes) are estimated to produce 73% of African American, 66% of Latino, and 34% of White dropouts, respectively.

    Higher Education
    According to a relatively recent graduation rate report from the Education Sector, an independent think tank, “Fewer than half of the black students who enroll in college graduate from four-year institutions within six years. Nationally, the average six-year graduation rate for all students is 57 percent.”
    Moreover, a 2009 Associated Press analysis of government data on the 83 federally designated four-year HBCUs indicated that only 37 percent of their black students finish a degree within six years, which is 4 percentage points lower than the national college graduation rate for black student

    Incarceration & Crime
    According to the Bureau of Justice Statistics, “The racial composition of the US prison and jail population as of 2008 was 60.21% (African American (non-Hispanic), 20.29% Hispanic, 13.44% White American (non-Hispanic) , and 6.06% Other (American Indian, Alaska Native, Asian American, Native Hawaiian, Pacific Islander American, and Multiracial American).”
    Relative to black on black crime, the most recent government statistics indicated that “43% of all murder victims in 2007 were African American, 93.1% of whom were killed were African Americans.”

    You are in charge of your life, nobody else.
    (more)
  • JuneGagnon 2012/04/05 05:45:24
    JuneGagnon
    +1
    On the surface, democrats do "not appear" to care - -there ARE a few who do and I pray there are more out there!
  • mikeyavelli 2012/04/04 17:06:05
    mikeyavelli
    +1
    the dems still don't know that obammie-the-commie is out to destroy america anyway he can. how about that pesky supreme court?
  • avalanche 2012/04/04 16:45:05
    avalanche
    +1
    This is treason!
  • rdaddy 2012/04/04 13:34:59
    rdaddy
    +2
    No, because country doesn't come first to most Dems.
  • dominic garcia 2012/04/04 12:05:32 (edited)
    dominic garcia
    +1
    Obama needs to start serving America, not other nations, especially Russia! The Russians are friendly to us only when it it convenient for them. I believe Democrats are not real smart if they can not read between the lines after the open microphone ordeal. If anything they should be very suspicious of him.
  • Independent Thinker 2012/04/04 02:34:44
    Independent Thinker
    +1
    Having a background from Eastern Europe...whoever trusts old KGB members are definitely shutting their eyes to the reality of the situation - amazing!
  • Rubyking 2012/04/03 21:25:37
    Rubyking
    +1
    In russia, we don't want to destroy america, we just, look down at you
  • kilroy 2012/04/03 16:03:22
    kilroy
    +1
    Got to excuse me but "LOL" just LOL
  • D D 2012/04/03 12:56:38
    D D
    +2
    They are happy. Democrats/liberals are communist.
  • Someone Else 2012/04/03 12:34:39
    Someone Else
    +1
    Busted!!
  • clasact 2012/04/03 09:53:00
    clasact
    +1
    remember the other side of the coin also,I supose we should just stick with the cowboy diplomacy of the past
  • Jarhead 2012/04/03 02:54:39
    Jarhead
    +1
    I really don't think they care. The democratic party of the United States seem to "forget" anything that is inconvenient to their ideology that everybody but themselves are idiots and don't know how to live for themselves and need the all powerful president to tell them "Eat your broccoli" and "Don't forget to flush the toilet and wash your hands."
  • luke 2012/04/03 02:50:19
    luke
    +1
    the demon-rats don't seem to care a rats ass about our country, since obmure has been elected..what a damn shame of the democrat party has went to hell in a short time. I bet Harry Truman and FDR are spinning in their graves now..SAD SAD SAD VOTE THIS CROOK M & HIS CRONIES OUT IN NOV 12.... PEOPLE GET REAL CAN U HANDLE THE TRUTH R ARE U ONE OF THEM>>>>> DEMON-RATS
  • RocPaperScizors 2012/04/03 02:45:31
    RocPaperScizors
    +2
    "Do Democrats care that their trophy idiot is playing kissy-face with the Russians?"

    Why do conservatives always use tabloid-style writing, especially in headlines? Really?
  • mike j 2012/04/03 02:17:29
    mike j
    +2
    Is it not amazing when we see America being given away with whispers right in front of our eyes, a real hard slap in our American faces. Can you imagine the burning , seathing hate and disrespect that Obama has for the United States and its' Citizens ? He is telling the Russians of the wonders of the One World Order and you know , i wonder if the Russians think America has lost its' mind. You know the Kremlin folks must be laughing and dusting off the inscription on Nikitas' tomb , "We will bury You and never fire a shot."
  • Claybern 2012/04/03 01:31:26
    Claybern
    +1
    You bet they care. There may be less votes for obummer in the upcoming elections.
  • wildbill 2012/04/03 00:57:58
    wildbill
    +1
    The more dirt they throw, the more ground they lose.

    238 Presidential Scholars rate all 43 Presidents. Thursday, July 1, 2010

    The current president, Barack Obama, while highly rated on imagination (6th), communication ability (7th) and intelligence (8th) .......... enters at the 15th position out of 43.

    https://www.siena.edu/pages/1...
  • Claybern wildbill 2012/04/03 01:35:41
    Claybern
    +1
    This guy can sell used cars. That's what your statement tells me.
  • wildbill Claybern 2012/04/03 23:27:57
    wildbill
    +1
    If a president COULDN'T sell used cars, he not only wouldn't BECOME President, but couldn't convince any nation in the world about anything.

    Other than that, your statement only tells us about YOU, not President Obama.
  • Claybern wildbill 2012/04/05 01:52:38
    Claybern
    +1
    He's still a used car salesman, just look at his record as our leader.
  • wildbill Claybern 2012/04/06 03:17:27
    wildbill
    +1
    Just a few of his accomplishments.

    1. Repealed Don't ask Don't tell.
    2. Sought Verifiable Reductions in Nuclear Stockpiles. New Stark Treaty
    3. Ended The Use Of Torture And Ensured Lawful Interrogations
    Executive Order 13491
    4. Health Care and Education Reconciliation Act of 2010 (H.R. 4872)
    5. Created New Financial Regulations “ American Financial Stability Act of 2010
    6. Reformed Mandatory Minimum Sentences “ National Defense Authorization Act of 2010 Sec 4713
    7. Restricted Warrantless Wiretaps “ Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act
    8. Strengthened Antitrust Enforcement “ Antitrust Initiative"
    9. Provided a Path To Citizenship For Undocumented Immigrants
    10. Created A Tax Credit For Workers “ Obama wanted a $500 credit but passed the bill at a slightly lesser $400 credit.
    11.Require More Disclosure And A Waiting Period For Earmarks “ Transparency and Integrity in Earmarks Act „
    12 Created 225,000 "Green" Jobs
    13. Small Business Jobs Act of 2010
    14 Trained And Equipped The Afghan Army
    15.Added Additional Security To The Borders “ Immigration Reform
    16.Signed National Defense Authorization Act
  • Uranos7 wildbill 2012/04/11 21:28:35
    Uranos7
    +1
    TREATMENT OF PRISONERS

    On December 15, when I first reported the inhumane conditions of Bradley Manning’s detention, I did not assign any blame to — or even mention — Barack Obama. Although, as Commander-in-Chief, Obama was technically responsible for Manning’s treatment, there was no evidence that he even knew about it, let alone planned it. But since then, the Manning controversy exploded into national prominence and Obama has explicitly defended the treatment, leaving no doubt that it directly reflects on who he is as a leader and a person.

    ON IRAN
    Fact is that after a year with Obama at the helm of the ship of state, Iran hasn't halted its nuclear program but, instead, now has enough enriched uranium on hand to make at least one nuclear weapon. Yet as of the late fall, the Obama administration still wants to give the tyrants in Tehran more time to see the error of their ways. That's just not likely, considering Tehran's 20-plus years of denial and deception over its nuclear program.

    This "What, me worry?" attitude has interested parties increasingly on edge as they await the day Iran, a country that calls for the destruction of Israel and the United States and is the world's most active state sponsor of terrorism, goes nuclear.
    ON ISRAELY RELATIONS
    One might even expect that U.S...



















    TREATMENT OF PRISONERS

    On December 15, when I first reported the inhumane conditions of Bradley Manning’s detention, I did not assign any blame to — or even mention — Barack Obama. Although, as Commander-in-Chief, Obama was technically responsible for Manning’s treatment, there was no evidence that he even knew about it, let alone planned it. But since then, the Manning controversy exploded into national prominence and Obama has explicitly defended the treatment, leaving no doubt that it directly reflects on who he is as a leader and a person.

    ON IRAN
    Fact is that after a year with Obama at the helm of the ship of state, Iran hasn't halted its nuclear program but, instead, now has enough enriched uranium on hand to make at least one nuclear weapon. Yet as of the late fall, the Obama administration still wants to give the tyrants in Tehran more time to see the error of their ways. That's just not likely, considering Tehran's 20-plus years of denial and deception over its nuclear program.

    This "What, me worry?" attitude has interested parties increasingly on edge as they await the day Iran, a country that calls for the destruction of Israel and the United States and is the world's most active state sponsor of terrorism, goes nuclear.
    ON ISRAELY RELATIONS
    One might even expect that U.S.. - Israeli relations would be tighter these days, considering the mutual atomic ayatollah threat. But no, instead ties are the worst they've been in, estimably, decades, making progress on Middle East Peace Process even less likely.
    ON THE PEOPLE OF IRAN
    And where was the leader of the Free World when Iranians were demonstrating--and dying--for liberty on Tehran's streets this year? Mostly dithering with talking points, trying not to appear to be "meddling," as the president put it. At one rally this fall, according to press reports, an anti-government protestor carried a sign, directed at President Obama: "Either you're with them [the Iranian government] or you're with us."
    ON RUSSIA
    In support of this, Russia is involved in a military buildup with President Dmitry Medvedev calling for "comprehensive rearmament" of the once-mighty Russian armed forces, despite global economic woes.

    Russia is also in the business of selling arms to potential foes of America, including China, Iran, Syria and Venezuela. Of proliferation concern, Moscow is building Tehran's first nuclear reactor and has offered them to Caracas, too.

    According to Smiley, “poor people have been rendered invisible” during the budget debate taking place on Capitol Hill and both Congress and Obama need to give them greater consideration.

    ON THE POOR

    "It's not just about the president," Smiley said. "Having said this, it would be nice to hear the president say the word 'poor.' To say the word 'poverty.' We get conversations about the middle class. Well, the new poor are the former middle class. But we can't get this president or any leaders to say the words 'poor' or 'poverty,' much less do anything about it."



    It’s also not just about Black people, Smiley said, adding that "you can't ignore that Black people are catching the most hell in this recession."



    West, who eagerly campaigned for Obama in 2008, is now an outspoken critic of the president, arguing that he has placed the needs of Wall Street and corporate America over poor and working class Americans
    (more)
  • wildbill Uranos7 2012/04/13 01:26:37 (edited)
    wildbill
    +1
    In the 1980's we used Iraq to keep Iran in check. Everyone knew that Saddam Hussein was a bad guy, but he was OUR bad guy. President Reagan considered him an Ally.

    "Reagan/Bush administrations permitted—and frequently encouraged—the flow of money, agricultural credits, dual-use technology, chemicals, and weapons to Iraq."
    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/...

    But then those Saudis Sheiks started frequenting "The Ranch" under the G.W. Bush administration. They weren't there for the barbecue. Saudis considered Saddam Hussein a major threat and were willing to make a deal with President GW Bush. They wanted us to get rid of him and promised a continuous flow of oil in return. We never went into Iraq for THEIR oil. We were protecting the flow of Saudi oil.
    So when we took out Saddam Hussein we got rid of Iran's biggest threat. That put IRAN, with a Shia majority, in control in the region. Now THEY are our biggest threat. So, going to war in Iraq not only botched our efforts in Afghanistan, It created a huge problem for us in Iran.

    (Reuters) - The United States, European allies and even Israel generally agree on three things about Iran's nuclear program: Tehran does not have a bomb, has not decided to build one, and is probably years away from having a deliverable nuclear warhea...
    In the 1980's we used Iraq to keep Iran in check. Everyone knew that Saddam Hussein was a bad guy, but he was OUR bad guy. President Reagan considered him an Ally.

    "Reagan/Bush administrations permitted—and frequently encouraged—the flow of money, agricultural credits, dual-use technology, chemicals, and weapons to Iraq."
    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/...

    But then those Saudis Sheiks started frequenting "The Ranch" under the G.W. Bush administration. They weren't there for the barbecue. Saudis considered Saddam Hussein a major threat and were willing to make a deal with President GW Bush. They wanted us to get rid of him and promised a continuous flow of oil in return. We never went into Iraq for THEIR oil. We were protecting the flow of Saudi oil.
    So when we took out Saddam Hussein we got rid of Iran's biggest threat. That put IRAN, with a Shia majority, in control in the region. Now THEY are our biggest threat. So, going to war in Iraq not only botched our efforts in Afghanistan, It created a huge problem for us in Iran.

    (Reuters) - The United States, European allies and even Israel generally agree on three things about Iran's nuclear program: Tehran does not have a bomb, has not decided to build one, and is probably years away from having a deliverable nuclear warhead.
    http://www.reuters.com/articl...
    (more)
  • Uranos7 wildbill 2012/04/18 00:06:04
    Uranos7
    I agree with your responce exept that, Iran does want a nuclear bomb they have said so and tried to buy them from the Russians. Of course noone is crazy enough to sell him one. ( unless North Korea gets one)

    "is probably years away from having a deliverable nuclear warhead. "

    Years as in 2-3 years he could develope one on his own if we stand by and do nothing, and that statement was made in 2009. Then the entire world would be on the brink of world war 3 with nukes in the hands of a man crazy enough not only to use them but belive God will protect him from anyone firing back.

    The United States and Israel are on the same page in judging how long it would take Iran to have a nuclear weapon that could strike a target: about a year to produce a bomb and then another one to two years to put it on a missile.

    Rumors periodically pop up of other secret enrichment sites, but so far they have not been substantiated. "Most of the people who make the argument that they might have a covert facility or a series of covert facilities are doing that to justify bombing them sooner rather than later," said Colin Kahl, a former defense official focused on the Middle East.

    Israel bombed one last month.

    The nuclear threat is growing. They are getting relatively close to the place where they can make t...
    I agree with your responce exept that, Iran does want a nuclear bomb they have said so and tried to buy them from the Russians. Of course noone is crazy enough to sell him one. ( unless North Korea gets one)

    "is probably years away from having a deliverable nuclear warhead. "

    Years as in 2-3 years he could develope one on his own if we stand by and do nothing, and that statement was made in 2009. Then the entire world would be on the brink of world war 3 with nukes in the hands of a man crazy enough not only to use them but belive God will protect him from anyone firing back.

    The United States and Israel are on the same page in judging how long it would take Iran to have a nuclear weapon that could strike a target: about a year to produce a bomb and then another one to two years to put it on a missile.

    Rumors periodically pop up of other secret enrichment sites, but so far they have not been substantiated. "Most of the people who make the argument that they might have a covert facility or a series of covert facilities are doing that to justify bombing them sooner rather than later," said Colin Kahl, a former defense official focused on the Middle East.

    Israel bombed one last month.

    The nuclear threat is growing. They are getting relatively close to the place where they can make the decision to assemble all three parts of their program -- enrichment, missile, weaponization," House Intelligence Committee Chairman Mike Rogers said in an interview. Khamenei "hasn't said 'put it together' yet," said Rogers, a Republican. "Have they decided to sprint to making the device that blows up? Probably not. But are they walking to a device that blows up? Yes."
    (more)
  • wildbill Uranos7 2012/04/18 07:35:29
    wildbill
    Israel knows that only the United States has enough bunker busting bombs to even come close to taking out all of Iran's nuclear facilities. Because of the depth of those nuclear locations 3 or 4 bombs are needed for just ONE facility. All of them HAVE to be delivered to the exact same location (exactly on top of each other) to penetrate deep enough. So multiply that by more than a dozen sites and it may not even be possible to get all of them.

    In spite of the media"s and public opinion beating the drums for war, our best military intelligence is convinced that Iran has not yet decided to build a nuclear bomb. They also are convinced the only way they WOULD go all in as far as building one is if their nuclear sites are attacked. That would give Tehran all the cover it needs to convince Iranians that they MUST have a nuclear bomb.

    North Korea is a more serious threat. For them it's just a matter of eventually getting their insane act together.
  • Uranos7 wildbill 2012/04/18 18:34:04
    Uranos7
    Yes North Korea worries me too history has proven any time thier military get's a new toy they have to go try it out.
  • ed 2012/04/02 23:43:04
    ed
    +2
    how can they care when they are with him kissing the russians ass.I sure sooner or later obama's lips have to get sore or tired and that is when another democrat steps up to the plate and takes over.
  • Torchmanner ~PWCM~JLA 2012/04/02 22:55:30
    Torchmanner ~PWCM~JLA
    +2
    No, because they are almost all communists anyway.
  • BILL 2012/04/02 21:42:20 (edited)
    BILL
    +2
    They are to busy grabbing all the free stuff OHBOBO is handing out
    ohbobo
  • wildbill BILL 2012/04/06 03:22:23
    wildbill
    +1
    Free stuff like...?
  • BILL wildbill 2012/04/07 03:24:44
    BILL
    +2
    If you haven't figured it out by now then you never will
  • wildbill BILL 2012/04/09 00:48:47
    wildbill
    +1
    So you just say "free stuff" but are unable to list any?

    YOU are the one bringing up the idea about stuff being free, NOT ME. So explain yourself or admit the whole idea is all your imagination.
  • BILL wildbill 2012/04/10 00:49:34
    BILL
    Well it looks like your the one with a problem, Welfare, Housing, Food, Medical anything people can get just so long as they don't have to work for it, some how I get the idea that you are right up there in front, is that where you get the Wild from you go crazy if you have to pay for anything or maybe someone mentions anything like Get a Job, I am really sorry if the Truth Hurts
  • wildbill BILL 2012/04/10 02:14:24
    wildbill
    +1
    In 1996 President Clinton signed the Personal Responsibility and Work Opportunity Reconciliation Act. That shifted the responsibility of finding jobs for people out of work to the states. There is NO FREE welfare as you knew it. People getting welfare have to prove they are looking for work and it they don't find work they are cut off. Most states also have drug testing. In short it is not a federal program anymore.
    I have worked for 44 years and retired from 3 companies. Only time I ever drew unemployment was when the company I worked for 20 years sold out in 1981. That the worst year of my life. Companies locked their front gates and refused to accept applications. They already had thousands of them. Only was offered a job after a newspaper reporter saw me running with teenagers for temporary state fair jobs to keep from losing our house. The write up in the newspaper got me a job offer over the phone.
    I have fed my family, payed off my student loan, saved for retirement, put 2 sons through college, and paid off our mortgage. What free stuff?
    .
  • BILL wildbill 2012/04/10 22:08:20
    BILL
    +2
    Your Breaking My Heart BOO HOO
    SOB
  • wildbill BILL 2012/04/11 00:12:54
    wildbill
    +1
    A broken heart goes well with your broken sense of reality.

    Nice racial SLOB meter.
  • BILL wildbill 2012/04/11 20:22:37
    BILL
    +2
    I made my comment you chose to challenge it, and I have a right to defend it right or wrong, so you can just keep Whining and
    lick

See Votes by State

The map above displays the winning answer by region.

News & Politics

2014/08/20 04:56:17

Hot Questions on SodaHead
More Hot Questions

More Community More Originals