Quantcast

Did you participate in Chik-Fil-A's celebration of bigotry?

The Wrong Guy 2012/08/03 05:46:40
You!
Add Photos & Videos
It's not about free speech, folks. Nobody ever said the CEO of the restaurant isn't entitled to his opinions or beliefs. What people are (rightfully) angry about is that this same man donates money to groups who actively pursue agendas that seek to discriminate against a group of people - in one case, they even supported (more or less) the murder of homosexuals in Uganda. THAT'S what people are angry about. Nobody really gives a sh*t what the guy had to say; this is America - you're allowed to be just as wrong and ignorant as you want to be, and (double-edged sword here, kids) you have the right to let the rest of us know just exactly how ignorant/hateful you take pride in being (conservatives, I'm looking at you).

They're being boycotted, and then there's an "anti-boycott" of a sort by folks who agree with the sort of intolerance this man supports with your money? Fantastic! That's how Americans vote, ultimately - with their dollars. If you went to Chik-Fil-A for the sole purpose of letting everyone else know how "against gay marriage" you are, though, it's pretty fair to assume that you're an idiot.


(look at this fat f*ck - he's so tickled to put another dollar in the till so that gay folks everywhere will (he hopes) never forget that they're second-class citizens)
Add a comment above

Top Opinion

Sort By
  • Most Raves
  • Least Raves
  • Oldest
  • Newest
Opinions

  • addie 2012/08/28 01:53:09
    No
    addie
    +1
    Of course not!
  • DJPanicDC 2012/08/09 17:00:40
    No
    DJPanicDC
    +1
    There are way better things to stand up for than a rich guy, contributing to hate groups from the profits of his underpaid employees and greasy chicken
    People pick the strangest causes, work in in a soup kitchen or something
  • William 2012/08/08 03:31:23
    Yes
    William
    +1
    I can't help it. Their chicken is just soooo good!
  • Brad # 2486547 2012/08/06 13:14:42
    Maybe
    Brad # 2486547
    +2
    It is about free speech and if my town had a Chik-fil-A. I would have eaten there to express my freedom. You don't like conservatives and I don't approve of gay marriage. Gay Union..sure...not marriage. Marriage is between a man and a woman. Simple.

    You are the one full of hate. You can't stand that someone has an opinion different from yours. So when you come across a differing few, you insult, slander, vilify anyone who you disagree with.

    liberals showing hate

    liberals showing hate

    liberals showing hate

    liberal hate

    liberal hate
  • reaper Brad # ... 2012/08/07 19:16:50
    reaper
    some liberals are christian, oh yeah, and this.

    liberals christian yeahliberals christian yeahliberals christian yeah
  • Brad # ... reaper 2012/08/08 16:18:56
    Brad # 2486547
    I don't see much hate there nor do I see threats of violence. The graffiti is a bad choice, but nothing that has not been said on TV shows like Will and Grace and other Hollywood movies.
  • reaper Brad # ... 2012/08/08 18:41:26
    reaper
    +1
    you remember that video from dearborn of the muslims throwing stuff? the middle photo is during that same day. take note of the pigs head on the stick. they only went to provoke people and act like victims.
  • Brad # ... reaper 2012/08/09 13:01:15 (edited)
    Brad # 2486547
    Oh and the great Chick-Fil-A "kiss in" wasn't an attempt to provoke people?



    Offensive anti christian artwork

    What about leftists/democrats who burn American flags and desecrate Jesus or Christianity? I call that a provocation.


    Offensive anti christian artwork

    american flag burning by americans

    american flag burning by americans

    contorversial religious art
  • reaper Brad # ... 2012/08/09 18:03:06
    reaper
    yeah, i find the flag and bible destroying stuff lame myself. as most others who are also leftists/democrats.
  • Brad # ... reaper 2012/08/10 11:38:19
    Brad # 2486547
    I am glad to hear that you find it disturbing. The same is true for conservatives, most of them find hate speech and graffiti wrong and distasteful.
  • reaper Brad # ... 2012/08/10 18:06:49
    reaper
    +1
    some graffiti is cool

    graffiti cool
  • Brad # ... reaper 2012/08/11 12:31:19
    Brad # 2486547
    I don't disagree with that. Some of it is pretty good art work.
  • Average... Brad # ... 2012/08/16 18:47:10
    Average Joe
    +1
    Exactly. When one disgrees with the homosexual lifestyle gays are quick to label us "haters" or "homophobes" when neither label is true. And the majority of gays bitching about Chik-fil-a have no clue about the owner's so-called donations. This is where it becomes hypocritical as hell. Now the gays and gay advocates are trying to say they're protesting because of Chik-fil-A owner's political leanings, support and donations, which is also a joke as one should be able to supoort whoever they want without fear of harassment or retaliation. However, let's get real, they're protesting (read: attacking) because this faction doesn't agree with homosexuality, period.
  • NeutronBomb 2012/08/06 01:54:15
    Yes
    NeutronBomb
    I bought a gay chicken.
  • Jack Sprat 2012/08/05 22:41:18
    Yes
    Jack Sprat
    Oddly the real bigots are those who can't stand to see anyone's right of free speech versus the non-existant right to "gay" marriage. Kudos on your ability to discriminate between the "haters"...

    Oh, and I gave you a pity rave, cuz I know you liberals like to "feel" as though you're right, rather than being right.

    Hey, slim bob did you "donate" or give any support to these "right of free speechers"...

    all of my heros kill cops


    ows chicago plot to kill cops

    ows chicago plot to kill cops


    This batch of brain dead OWS were going to bomb Cops in Chi-town

    http://politix.topix.com/img/...
  • reaper Jack Sprat 2012/08/06 08:14:20
    reaper
    occupiers have no love for black bloc. or at least most don't. there is video from oakland of BB guys destroying stuff and occupiers trying to stop them.
  • Jack Sprat reaper 2012/08/06 23:42:49
  • reaper Jack Sprat 2012/08/06 23:56:21
    reaper
    +1
    remember this guy? and how he was killed? and how christian conservatives praised the guy that did it?

    remember guy killed christian conservatives praised guy
  • Jack Sprat reaper 2012/08/07 00:04:47
    Jack Sprat
    +2
    Actually Christians don't believe in polygamy or child abuse, but if you're going for extremist socialists......dring this kool aid......Jonesville, took the food stamp money in the liberation theology's version of "sharing the wealth"......Hey isn't BO's spiritual mentor, pastor and 'father figure', "uncle Wright" a follower of the socialist liberation theology? By golly I believe he is, and lucky us, what with BO having that "failed selective hearing" for 17 years didn't "know it" ...

    jim jones kills many
  • reaper Jack Sprat 2012/08/07 00:13:43
    reaper
    +1
    oh, bad move on the child abuse line...

    child abuse line

    along with making threats of hell to little kids if they don't obey. or from their priest if they tell anyone they are getting messed with.

    child abuse line threats kids obey priest messed
  • Jack Sprat reaper 2012/08/07 00:23:21
    Jack Sprat
    +2
    That's odd I didn't see where the couple had "spanked" thousands of late term babies to death abortions by whacking a hole int the back of their head and then sucking the brain out, or like Holdren (as I recall) supporting the "abortions" of "babies" up to two year olds because "they don't pay their way", sigh.

    He Genius, and I use that term with my dogs, did you know that the molestation rate of the Catholic priesthood is an un-G_dly 2%, oddly the same as other denominations, but half the 4% of the rest of the world. Small but sugnificant difference, seeing that your local NEA Sandusky's are twice as prone to destroy a childs life.......you must be very proud....

    Now don't let anyone tell you your ignorant, you'll have to figure that one out all on your own.
  • reaper Jack Sprat 2012/08/07 00:57:00
    reaper
    +1
    you do know late term is recommend for more major medical problems right? just ask santorum. and besides, you think there might be a possibility the churches little problem has been going on for like, at least 1,000 years? and the cover ups... THE COVER UPS!
  • Jack Sprat reaper 2012/08/07 19:11:35
    Jack Sprat
    "you do know late term is recommend for more major medical problems"
    I know that the Bible says in the rare cases to save the life of the mother abortion was practiced and allowed, now throw in all the incest and rapes, like the original Roe decision talked about and you're up to 1% of all abortions, Kudos for you.

    So for at least a 1000 years priests have covered up the 2% of the rapes they are guilty of and the Sandusky's of the world have covered up the 4% of the rapes they're guilty of, good point.
  • reaper Jack Sprat 2012/08/07 19:18:03
    reaper
    it's likely to of been worse before.
  • Jack Sprat reaper 2012/08/07 19:27:54
    Jack Sprat
    Yea, the romans sold children as sex slaves, before Christianity.
  • reaper Jack Sprat 2012/08/07 19:29:35
    reaper
    i mean for the church
  • Jack Sprat reaper 2012/08/07 19:44:19
    Jack Sprat
    So you did, how'd that work out for you?

    Oddly the Greeks did too as did all the pagan empires, except the Jews and later the Christian, were the churches outlawed the practice within, even though legal outside of the church and synagogue.
  • Brad # ... reaper 2012/08/08 16:15:11
    Brad # 2486547
    That's speculation, not proof.
  • reaper Brad # ... 2012/08/08 18:42:12
    reaper
    true, but think we'll ever know?
  • Brad # ... reaper 2012/08/08 16:20:13
  • reaper Brad # ... 2012/08/08 18:50:42
  • ruralntex 2012/08/05 03:36:29
    Maybe
    ruralntex
    +2
    I haven't, only because there isn't one in my town. Marriage has been defined by states as being between one woman and one man. If the state you live in doesn't recognize same sex marriage, you have a number of options. You can move to a state that does recognize SSM, you can go straight, or you or your loved one can get a sex change. Society is not going to change to make you feel good about you.
  • ☆astac☆ 2012/08/04 19:10:00
    No
    ☆astac☆
    +1
    Since it was not a celebration of bigotry (that would be the gay kiss in), no I did not participate.
  • Marvelous Wildfire 2012/08/04 15:31:44
    No
    Marvelous Wildfire
    +3
    ABSOLUTELY NOT!
    Instead, I supported "Chik-Fil-A Appreciation Day", not the next day where the Anti-Freedom bigots tried to stifle CEO's right to support what he believes.

    Isn't it interesting how "tolerant" the Liberal/Progressives are . . . but only if you are willing to Goose-step to their demands and beliefs.

    OH! I also sent money to the vacation fund for the Tucson young lady that had to deal with the Anti-Freedom bigot POS.
    It was so funny, when the bully was fired for being a dumbass! Hahahahahahaha!
  • reaper Marvelo... 2012/08/05 05:27:25
  • Bill reaper 2012/08/06 22:39:15 (edited)
    Bill
    +2
    No! It was because of the three mayors that said that they didn't want them in their cities and wouldn't allow them in. Boycotts are fine, restraint of trade for political purposes is not. Please cite for me any mayor or governor that said that PP is not allowed in their state.
    Here is what PP does...
    AbortionGraph

    This is what Chick-fil-a does.
    ChickFilA
  • reaper Bill 2012/08/06 23:44:39
    reaper
    +1
    no state trying to ban PP, but trying hard to keep them from getting funding or keep them out through legislation.
    http://www.reuters.com/articl...
    http://articles.latimes.com/2...
    http://www.huffingtonpost.com...

    yeah, way to post info trying to be deceptive on what PP does all together. oh, and what are those numbers on the chart referring to?

    httpwww huffingtonpost yeah post info deceptive pp numbers chart referring
  • Bill reaper 2012/08/07 12:24:07 (edited)
    Bill
    +1
    If PP were providing ONLY those services, there would be no complaint from me. Your pie chart indicates that 3% of their services is providing abortion services. OK I'll accept that for the time being. My bar graph indicates the number of abortions performed in that 3%. As you can see, in 2008. about 320.000 abortions were provided by PP. I think that those abortion services should not be funded and that if they stopped, the money should flow in to them for the good that they do.

    From the same place that you got your pie chart from:
    http://www.factcheck.org/2011...
    Its 2011 fact sheet says it performed 332,278 abortion procedures in 2009. That would mean that roughly one out of every 10 clients received an abortion.

    Why would anyone want to fund this organization?
  • reaper Bill 2012/08/07 19:13:33
    reaper
    yeah, less then 350,000 in that year. very far off from the million average huh?
  • Bill reaper 2012/08/07 20:07:35
    Bill
    +2
    WTF??? That's just on the PP side. There are about 1.36 million abortions a year and about 19,000 of them (1.4%) are partial birth abortions. What, 350,000 isn't enouth for you?
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 ... 8 Next » Last »

See Votes by State

The map above displays the winning answer by region.

News & Politics

2013/05/21 08:23:11

Hot Questions on SodaHead
More Hot Questions

More Community More Originals