Did you know they hauled George Zimmerman's Wife to Jail as well? Is the media having an effect on how due process is being carried out in this case?

Well, I can see you skimmed the top of it (but fair enough, its long!) but you present nothing "presented as fact" that is wrong. To be honest, I do believe that Obama would not care (nor do I think he cares about Trayvon as an individual either but rather the issue) but neither you or can know what is in Obama's head. That was clearly presented as a viewpoint, not something supported in the record.

Ironically, you are right, and the main thrust of the article IS that it is in the news in great part because it was an opportunity for the left to attack the Stand your Ground Laws. George Zimmerman was not the "latest to believe it", I don't think he was believing or thinking much as he was being beaten and screaming for help, other than he was getting his ass kicked and was scared.

He doesn't strike me as the type that blogs about politics. However, he is a registered Democrat (that is a fact and part of the record) since you speak about white conservatives and him being the latest to believe it (he isn't so "white" either). No one in the initial investigation mentioned the term stand your ground, nor did George claim it as his defense (nor is there any evidence he knew of its existence). He claimed and the investigation was conducted under the regular self defense laws. Once the media got wind of this and saw it as an opportunity to attack the Stand your Ground Laws (which apparently state its ok to "murder black children" interesting interpretation) as well as push for gun control etc... it did.

You are more removed from the facts than I expected, but that's what explains your opinion. The "Efin coon" (also in the article) was something CNN made up and then had to take back, from the recording on Zimmerman's call to the 911 operator. That is not something Trayvon heard. He definitely was not running away from a "gun toting bigot", George had not drawn his gun. But this is exactly the kind of the thing the media has caused, and was exactly my point, I would want the guy dead too if the things the media said were true.

It was Trayvon who did "stand his ground" and confronted the guy who kept staring at him (cause it was his job as the neighborhood watch). Its plain enough, an altercation started, there was no gun drawn, Trayvon didn't swing at a guy holding a gun.

Now don't get me wrong, in no way am I saying Trayvon should have been shot, and you are right, he was just walking home.. that is fine. Apparently, he just had a temper and stepped up to the "creepy" guy staring at him, and clocked him. That is fair enough, not a reason to get killed, but once he jumped on him and kept beating him, it explains "why" he got killed, not that it was ok. A better man than George could have handled it differently, but not being a better man is not the same as being a murderer. Now, its clear to me really that you have a completely distorted view of the events. If you want to actually read the distortions of the facts the media played, and learn the real facts of the case, what the witnesses actually said that night to police, what the 911 recordings actually show, and what the police found at the scene, and then tell me why I am wrong then I am happy to hear, but if we have two completely different versions of the facts in our head, there is nothing to argue about. Mine came from real research. Yours came from half heard propaganda. Because I am not arguing that you should be able to be a gun toting bigot and chase down and murder young black kids.