Did We Attack Libya Because of Their Oil?

if you say we did not invade for oil then your just plane DUMB!
lol you guy sbelieve government crap that say they are there to save civilians but n reality more civilians have died since the invasion (and its america that kills them)
wake up! its purely for selfish reasons! aka oil and money

Look, if we attacked to "protect the lives and freedoms of the innocent civilians" then we would also need to attack the governments of all of the other countries that abuse their people (which is a lot). However we didn't attack them specifically for oil. Libya only produces about 2% of the worlds oil supplies so it shouldn't be as big of an issue as it is. The real problem is that the media made a big deal of how much this crisis would affect oil prices and the people just ate it up, which resulted in people freaking out, which resulted in oil stocks dropping, which resulted in oil prices rising. We had to attack Libya and pretend that we wanted to protect the civilians and restore order so that people would trust oil stocks again. If you want to find out who is at fault for the attack on Libya, just look in a mirror you mindless media entranced zombies! I apologize to the few rational thinking non-zombies for that last statement.

We went in there to save innocent civillians from being massacred and aid the resistance to the murderer Gadaffi, not for oil...

of coz because of oil...there are many things u can do if u wanna help people, like japan tsunami and 20 million poverty in US it self.. thailand had problem , US never interfered, y? sri lanka had goverment problem, US never interfered, why?
Even if they want to defend the people of Libya, why they need to use war??
Coz only one reason: for oil and power againts arab countries..

How can anyone take you seriously if you are going to use the english language as you are? At minimum, complete a sentence in appropriate fashion. I'm having a hard time stating in public that i agree with what you are saying. But since you are right about the fights our government chooses, then i will approve of your message 100%. But please carry your message with professionalism and appropriate grammer.

Not for the oil WE use in the US. That oil is refined in and stays in Europe. It's a different grade of oil than we refine and use in the US.

But we still have no idea what we are doing in libya

Conspiracy nuts believe in the oil theory.
All the shooting in the middle east can keep spreading and all of the oil will not stop the bloodshed!

We did not attack Libya for oil just like we did not invade Iraq or oil. The most ironic thing is that the same Senators that were against Iraq and Afghanistan are also in favor of Libya. To liberals war is all about politics. By the way libs where was the congressional approval for starting a war with LIbya?

Of course. We never go after nations without oil....Darfur or Congo or other african nations without resources are either controlled by dictators the US/UK and other colonizers set up. Obama will regret bringing Biden, Clinton, and the other 100% zionists into his cabinet...

Of course it is. Do people think we're looking for sand and camels? Anyway getting our guys hurt and killed is a small sacrifice to make when you think about how much good not drilling here is doing for our environment.

how come other countries that are in crisis don't get help, Congo etc.

And attacking for oils is stupid and greedy. These people deserve to be free.

To stop a mad man from using the money from the sale of oil to buy weapons to Kill Libya's freedom fighters

ofcourse for oil what else we didnt do anything when it was about tunisia or egypt and now we want to protect libya i mean comon OIL is the only reason we attacked libya the problem is what will happend if we loose no oil and we are loosing lot of money that wwe dont have on these attacks something is wrong and even if we win we'r gona have to share it cause France is leading the Attack how did that happend !!

We attacked due to public opionon.

Did President Bush line up a bunch of oil tankers outside Iraq after that war? No though he should have. We import less than 1% of oil from Libya so no, we're not there for the oil. Perhaps a little payback to Kadafi but more than likely, it's just business.
Funny that the French are leading the way.

we suck iraq dry and now its time to move to libya !

We haven't gotten a damn thing out of Iraq but dead and mangled soldiers...and a whole lot of debt!

thats where ur wrong u should get ur facts straight man and one more thing
the goverment doesnt care about the soldiers who lost their lives ther on a war they didnt even no its reasons (what a shame)

Live a bit longer and the facts will present themselves. Don't make assumptions without proof Jonhnny boy...
I will agree with you about government and soldiers. That's why they send out the young ones. Anyone over thirty knows to keep their heads down...government can't have that, lol!

im just stating my opinion here didnt mean to be impolite or anything and i respect ur opinion as well:)

I know we need alternative fuel qaddafi and george w. bush declare war over oil obama is seeking sugar as anew fuel for are cars he went to brazil because that's how they fuel up their cars we need to do the same and stop killing for oil and blood.

No one will openly admit it. But, it's almost always about money or power.
And what does oil do? Oil creates money. Money creates Power.
The Western World can never get too much of either.

Same with Iraq. At least this time the UN agrees with military action.

OIL!?!? You CAN'T be serious!?!? DO'H!

DUH!!!!!!!!!!!!! If you think it is about humanitarian goals and 'innocent civilians' please step away from the Kool-Aid...

I hope not.

Just close your eyes, stick your finfgers in your ears, and shout loudly, "it´s not for the oil, it´s not for the oil, it´s not for..........LOL

i really do not know but looks like we are stretched out to far. We have enough problems of our own

Never a truer word spoken.

I can't believe how many white people will say whatever they feel just to attack Obama. We attacked Libya for oil? That's pretty dumb.

Hang on, are these the same WHITE people who said Bush attacked Iraq for the oil?
BTW, how did you get those great powers where you can tell from a comment on a website what colour the poster is. Tell me pleeeeeeeeeeeze. LOL.

Now Donny it wasn't just white people who claimed that. Are you being racist? LOL

Yes it is the same white people but these white people have a different agenda. Iraq has a lot of oil while Libya has very little. Why would Obama pick place with almost no oil to invade for oil?

Who told you Libya has almost no oil? It´s one of the riches oil natons in the world. They supply much of Western Europe´s needs, and China is an expanding market for them. That should give you a clue. LOL.

Clue this. That is not the reason for the attack but you needed something to attack him for so you people chose to make up this lie about him attacking for oil.

OK, now I get it. This isn´t about anything other than protecting Obama´s reputation (I use the word very lightly BTW) LOL. Actually, I never even gave the skinny retard a moments thought regarding this whole thing, because any idiot knows, the only decision the Kenyan makes is whether or not he should screw his ugly wife.
He´s ZOG´s puppet on a string, nothing more. He´s an insignificant worm that is making your once great country the laughing stock of the world. Personally, you can keep him as long as you want.

Libya has litle OIL WTF MAN u should get some information before posting something DUMB

You should learn how to spell before posting something dumb. Now edit your post, stupid.