Did President Obama lie when he said time and again that Obama Care was not a tax?? The Supreme Court has declared Obama Care a tax, humm now what President OBAMA ??
hazel
2012/06/29 02:12:19
|
|
|||||
|
124 votes
|
|
79% | |||
|
7 votes
|
|
4% | |||
|
26 votes
|
|
17% | |||
Surpreme Court Justice ROBERTS has done the American people a favor, President Obama has repeatedly said that Obama Care is not a tax, today the SUPREME court declred it as a tax....Obama lied to us all and we eed to show him how mad we are in NOVEMBER
Top Opinion
-
Barefooted Nana ∞ijm♥∞AFCL 2012/06/29 02:16:14President Obama lied to us when he said OBAMA CARE was not a tax
his intent is for socialism ( dressed & disguised as well ya know !)
and the supreme court is in essence allowing this in a desguise !
Think about it - Anyone who can be "for" something so unconstitutional already aren't going to care about how many lies it will take to get it going.
Sk*p the Drama
And Vote for Obama
then obama did tell pelosi / reid demanded every vote for & sign the bill before reading it .. this is a known fact ...and you trust obama & co ......?
shows your intellict & mentality !
I suggest you do some research before you come back & spew any more conjecture your unaware of ...!!!
which is it ? http://images.sodahead.com/pr...
again .....are you stupid ,,or just not able to comprehend the english language !
Thehill.com... after Supreme Court Chief Justice John Roberts wrote the majority opinion ... ""look at it as a power to tax,""" it’s ... raises $5.5M after health ruling Chief Justice Roberts ...
put another way. I have health insurance so the law doesn't impact me.
The Federal Government does not have the power to order people to buy health insurance. . . . The Federal Government"does have the power to impose a tax on those without health insurance." (National Federation of Independent Business v. Sebelius, Slip op. at 3, 41-42, 44)
Read more: http://www.americanthinker.co...
tax
1.a sum of money demanded by a government for its support or for specific facilities or services, levied upon incomes, property, sales, etc.
2.a burdensome charge, obligation, duty, or demand.
3.(of a government)
a.to demand a tax from (a person, business, etc.).
b.to demand a tax in consideration of the possession or occurrence of (income, goods, sales, etc.), usually in proportion to the value of money involved.
4.to lay a burden on; make serious demands on: to tax one's resources.
5.to take to task; censure; reprove; accuse: to tax one with laziness.
6.Informal . to charge: What did he tax you for that?
7.Archaic . to estimate or determine the amount or value of.
NEW YORK (CNNMoney) -- It walks like a tax and talks like a tax. Therefore it is a tax.
The Supreme Court on Thursday upheld the mandate to buy health insurance -- ruling that the law imposes a tax and not a penalty as originally billed by supporters.
http://money.cnn.com/2012/06/...
http://www.forbes.com/sites/s...
Whatever the motives, Chief Justice Roberts’s majority opinion upholding the constitutionality of the Affordable Care Act represents a stunning climax to the debate over the Affordable Care Act’s constitutionality. The opinion holds that the penalty for violating the individual mandate is not a tax for the purpose of determining whether the Court could rule on its constitutionality before it is enforced (under the Anti-Injunction Act). But, far more important, it holds that the penalty is a tax when assessing its constitutionality.
Take Notice; " But, far more important, it holds that the penalty is a tax when assessing its constitutionality.
Last sentence in that paragraph. The Supreme Court says it is a tax, it is a tax.
(edit) as it is a tax and was passed in reconciliation (51 to 49) it can be repealed by a 51/49 vote.
Medicare, For those with investment income, they also could be subject to a new 3.8% tax on at least a portion of their capital gains and dividends. Many of our retired folks live primarily on investment income. So now, Barry will be robbing from the old to help pay for those who didn't save or refuse to insure themselves.
Then we have your "Penalty".
In 2014, the penalty will be no more than $285 per family or 1% of income, whichever is greater. In 2015, the cap rises to $975 or 2% of income. And by 2016, the penalty would be up to $2,085 per family or 2.5% of income, whichever is greater.
What happens when your employer decides it's better to drop the high cost of his insurance and lets all his employees join the exchanges (which by the way have not been set up and no one has any idea how to set them up). Will you still consider it a "Penalty" when you employer takes a portion of that out of you paycheck?
Myself, I am self insured, but now they want to control how I spend my OWN money, despite the fact that I have never claimed any health costs on my taxes. They want to tell me that I can only put so much ($2500) a year into a self insurance account and HAVE to spend it according to what THEY allow. (SCREW them). Then if they think the...
Medicare, For those with investment income, they also could be subject to a new 3.8% tax on at least a portion of their capital gains and dividends. Many of our retired folks live primarily on investment income. So now, Barry will be robbing from the old to help pay for those who didn't save or refuse to insure themselves.
Then we have your "Penalty".
In 2014, the penalty will be no more than $285 per family or 1% of income, whichever is greater. In 2015, the cap rises to $975 or 2% of income. And by 2016, the penalty would be up to $2,085 per family or 2.5% of income, whichever is greater.
What happens when your employer decides it's better to drop the high cost of his insurance and lets all his employees join the exchanges (which by the way have not been set up and no one has any idea how to set them up). Will you still consider it a "Penalty" when you employer takes a portion of that out of you paycheck?
Myself, I am self insured, but now they want to control how I spend my OWN money, despite the fact that I have never claimed any health costs on my taxes. They want to tell me that I can only put so much ($2500) a year into a self insurance account and HAVE to spend it according to what THEY allow. (SCREW them). Then if they think they are getting another 3.8% of the money I worked my ass for and was smart enough to save and invest, they have another think coming. I am very capable of moving my money off shore. Then they won't even get the 15% I pay on it now.
There are a slew of new taxes, fees and what they prefer to call penalties unless they are arguing before the Supreme Court. Barry lied, Nasty Nancy is so stupid she didn't know she was lying (she like a Myna bird, repeat whatever she is told to say). The whole leftwing lied to the American people.
the employers are a different issue. that's a greed issue. wal-mart has thousands of associates that don't have health insurance and we both know they can afford it.
To your WalMart assertion. Typical leftist propaganda.
http://reclaimdemocracy.org/w...