Did Obama REALLY win?

---

Did Obama really win?

MORE evidence of skullduggery in vote count

---

The question must be asked. I wish I didn't have to be the one to ask it. But, since no one else will, it falls to me.





Did Barack Obama actually, legitimately, fairly and legally win the election?





My answer is an unequivocal no.





It was not a free and fair election. In fact, if we as a nation don't
acknowledge the reality of what I am saying, we may never have a free
and fair election again in the future of this once-great nation.



Here are some facts to consider:

The Obama campaign accepted at least some foreign campaign cash –
willingly and knowingly. The campaign website could have prohibited it.
It did not. In other words, it deliberately left open the door for
illegal foreign contributions in its "by any means necessary" quest for
re-election. WND has proven that by actually contributing under the name
Osama bin Laden from a Pakistani IP address, with a phony physical
address and other neon-lit red flags in hopes of catching attention.
Obama accepted illegal foreign contributions in 2008 without penalty, so
why would anyone expect him not to repeat his crime in 2012? No one can
know the extent of the fraud, because Obama has refused to release the
identity of donors of $200 or less – yet he boasts that most of the
money he collected was in small amounts.

James
O'Keefe and Project Veritas spent months heroically proving the
absolute willingness and eagerness of Democratic operatives to commit
voter fraud – especially by having people cast multiple votes.


Military ballots were systematically denied active-duty servicemen and
women around the world. This would be a scandal if it happened once. But
it has become the norm when Democrats are in charge of the Defense
Department. It would be a scandal if it were due to incompetence. But it
appears to be a deliberate effort to suppress the military vote. It
would be a scandal if it were not a close election. But it was.


Prior to the election, Democrats fought for open voting requiring no
identification – particularly photo ID. Coincidentally, Obama won every
state that didn't fully require photo ID to vote. Democrats contended
that voter ID laws suppress the vote. But they do not. They only
suppress the illegal vote.


Across Philadelphia, GOP poll inspectors were forcibly (and illegally)
removed from polling locations. Coincidentally (or not), Obama received
"astronomical" numbers in those very same regions, including locations
where he received "over 99 percent" of the vote. Ward 4, which also had a
poll watcher dressed in Obama attire, went massively for Obama. Obama
received 99.5 percent of the vote, defeating Romney 9,955 to 55.


Obama also won 99.8 percent of the vote in 44 Cleveland districts.


Obama received 10 million fewer votes than he did in 2008. Romney
received 3 million fewer votes than McCain. Obama won in the four
critical swing states by a grand total of 500,000 votes.


Some 5 million independents changed their votes from Obama to Romney in
2012. So Romney started the day 2.5 million votes ahead of where McCain
was in 2008, as Jack Wheeler points out. This means that 5.5 million
Republican voters are not accounted for. Either they didn't show up at
the polls or their votes were not counted. Does anyone believe there was
less enthusiasm by Republicans about this election than for the one in
2008?

I could go on and on, but you get the point. In such a close election,
these anomalies are unacceptable. In an election in which all the voter
fraud appears to be perpetrated by one side, it could more than make the
difference in the race. Worse yet, will an unscrupulous party that
would resort to such crimes to win ever permit another free and fair
election in the future – especially if the crimes are not exposed and
punished severely?






I believe going into the election that at least 5 percent of the
Democratic vote would be fraudulent. That would mean Republicans would
have to out-perform Democrats by 6 percent to win. I suspect now I was
too conservative in my projections of about the expected level of
criminality perpetrated by Obama's Democrats.





Remember from where Obama arose. He was a community organizer and
attorney for ACORN, which is nothing but an organized crime front with a
focus on throwing elections.





Do I think Obama won fair and square? No. I think he won only because of systematic fraud, corruption and abuse in the 2012 election.





Very likely, it would not have even been a close election had Obama not
made cheating – in every conceivable way – the central component of his
campaign effort.





Is there anything we can do about it now?





Not likely.





But if we want to ensure that America has free and fair elections in the
future, we better get to work. America's political system is becoming a
thugocracy.