Quantcast

Did Obama REALLY win?

TuringsChild 2012/12/06 19:11:36
Eh. I coulda told you THAT.
Pfft. Give it up. You LOST!
None of the above
You!
Add Photos & Videos



Did Obama really win?

MORE evidence of skullduggery in vote count








obama win evidence skullduggery vote countThe question must be asked. I wish I didn't have to be the one to ask it. But, since no one else will, it falls to me.





Did Barack Obama actually, legitimately, fairly and legally win the election?





My answer is an unequivocal no.





It was not a free and fair election. In fact, if we as a nation don't
acknowledge the reality of what I am saying, we may never have a free
and fair election again in the future of this once-great nation.



Here are some facts to consider:

The Obama campaign accepted at least some foreign campaign cash –
willingly and knowingly. The campaign website could have prohibited it.
It did not. In other words, it deliberately left open the door for
illegal foreign contributions in its "by any means necessary" quest for
re-election. WND has proven that by actually contributing under the name
Osama bin Laden from a Pakistani IP address, with a phony physical
address and other neon-lit red flags in hopes of catching attention.
Obama accepted illegal foreign contributions in 2008 without penalty, so
why would anyone expect him not to repeat his crime in 2012? No one can
know the extent of the fraud, because Obama has refused to release the
identity of donors of $200 or less – yet he boasts that most of the
money he collected was in small amounts.

    fraud obama refused release identity donors 200 boasts money collectedJames
    O'Keefe and Project Veritas spent months heroically proving the
    absolute willingness and eagerness of Democratic operatives to commit
    voter fraud – especially by having people cast multiple votes.


    Military ballots were systematically denied active-duty servicemen and
    women around the world. This would be a scandal if it happened once. But
    it has become the norm when Democrats are in charge of the Defense
    Department. It would be a scandal if it were due to incompetence. But it
    appears to be a deliberate effort to suppress the military vote. It
    would be a scandal if it were not a close election. But it was.


    Prior to the election, Democrats fought for open voting requiring no
    identification – particularly photo ID. Coincidentally, Obama won every
    state that didn't fully require photo ID to vote. Democrats contended
    that voter ID laws suppress the vote. But they do not. They only
    suppress the illegal vote.


    Across Philadelphia, GOP poll inspectors were forcibly (and illegally)
    removed from polling locations. Coincidentally (or not), Obama received
    "astronomical" numbers in those very same regions, including locations
    where he received "over 99 percent" of the vote. Ward 4, which also had a
    poll watcher dressed in Obama attire, went massively for Obama. Obama
    received 99.5 percent of the vote, defeating Romney 9,955 to 55.


    Obama also won 99.8 percent of the vote in 44 Cleveland districts.


    Obama received 10 million fewer votes than he did in 2008. Romney
    received 3 million fewer votes than McCain. Obama won in the four
    critical swing states by a grand total of 500,000 votes.


    Some 5 million independents changed their votes from Obama to Romney in
    2012. So Romney started the day 2.5 million votes ahead of where McCain
    was in 2008, as Jack Wheeler points out. This means that 5.5 million
    Republican voters are not accounted for. Either they didn't show up at
    the polls or their votes were not counted. Does anyone believe there was
    less enthusiasm by Republicans about this election than for the one in
    2008?



I could go on and on, but you get the point. In such a close election,
these anomalies are unacceptable. In an election in which all the voter
fraud appears to be perpetrated by one side, it could more than make the
difference in the race. Worse yet, will an unscrupulous party that
would resort to such crimes to win ever permit another free and fair
election in the future – especially if the crimes are not exposed and
punished severely?






I believe going into the election that at least 5 percent of the
Democratic vote would be fraudulent. That would mean Republicans would
have to out-perform Democrats by 6 percent to win. I suspect now I was
too conservative in my projections of about the expected level of
criminality perpetrated by Obama's Democrats.





Remember from where Obama arose. He was a community organizer and
attorney for ACORN, which is nothing but an organized crime front with a
focus on throwing elections.





Do I think Obama won fair and square? No. I think he won only because of systematic fraud, corruption and abuse in the 2012 election.





Very likely, it would not have even been a close election had Obama not
made cheating – in every conceivable way – the central component of his
campaign effort.





Is there anything we can do about it now?





Not likely.





But if we want to ensure that America has free and fair elections in the
future, we better get to work. America's political system is becoming a
thugocracy.

Read More: http://email.wnd.com/HM?a=ENX7CqpDLThJ8SA9MKJU-Vbn...

Add a comment above

Top Opinion

  • Zuggi 2012/12/06 19:46:27
    Pfft. Give it up. You LOST!
    Zuggi
    +21
    Jesus, you guys never get out of the bubble, do you?

Sort By
  • Most Raves
  • Least Raves
  • Oldest
  • Newest
Opinions

  • Bastion 2012/12/11 18:27:02
    Pfft. Give it up. You LOST!
    Bastion
  • PetrifiedElephantPoop 2012/12/11 17:22:56
    Pfft. Give it up. You LOST!
    PetrifiedElephantPoop
    +1
    When you use WND as a source....I am suspect to the conclusions being made. I don't think even if I were lending to your premise of voter fraud...etc. Obama won by 3% and close to 4 million votes. Start a tinfoil hat company or something. Romney Lost BIG!
  • Turings... Petrifi... 2012/12/13 01:52:18
    TuringsChild
    You didn't read down very far. When this q was 24 hrs old I admitted that this was a trolling question. It wasn't about Obama at all. It was about the hypocrisy of the libs here on this site. I deliberately chose an easily discreditable source so the hate would flow freely. And it succeeded so well that once they realized they'd been had, a few decided they had to push the admission off the front page. Carefully. I actually think it's kinda funny that they would put so much effort into covering it up.
  • Petrifi... Turings... 2012/12/15 14:55:51
    PetrifiedElephantPoop
    Nutty questions like this come up all the time. It got the response it deserved from me. Who cares if you cleverly duped people, this belief actually exists on SH.
  • JAR HEAD Turings... 2012/12/31 15:49:40
    JAR HEAD
    +1
    ya nice skewed perspective . and whatever false cleverness you are rambling about is only in your head . you should save some room for more dumb perspective sine you have so much
  • JAR HEAD Petrifi... 2012/12/31 15:42:35
    JAR HEAD
    +1
    real big
  • Kevin 2012/12/11 06:16:38
  • rbeas 2012/12/11 04:09:34
    Pfft. Give it up. You LOST!
    rbeas
    +1
    After reading your diatribe I have come to the conclusion you are on crack and the person who gave you that information should be arrested for selling drugs.
  • Wohuz 2012/12/11 03:59:09
    Pfft. Give it up. You LOST!
    Wohuz
    +1
    Seriously, give it up. You are just going to have to face reality and accept it.
  • JAR HEAD 2012/12/11 03:49:17
    None of the above
    JAR HEAD
    +2
    yes he won despite all the cheating from the Rescumlicans i mean Rep.and he won by ALOT
  • Turings... JAR HEAD 2012/12/11 03:51:55
    TuringsChild
    Yep. The Cheaters were bested by bigger Cheaters. And frankly I could care less. NEITHER side deserves the privilege of representing the American People.
  • lurx: the soda jerk 2012/12/10 19:51:06
    Pfft. Give it up. You LOST!
    lurx: the soda jerk
  • remy 2012/12/10 19:42:57
    Pfft. Give it up. You LOST!
    remy
    +1
    Yes...he won.
  • Turings... remy 2012/12/10 19:47:34
    TuringsChild
    Duh. Read my response below. The question was not really about Obama. It was about the liberals here on this site.
  • remy Turings... 2012/12/10 19:54:11
    remy
    +4
    Okay...I guess you were wrong in your assessment. I didn't write anything rude or snarky, though I do think it was a bit childish to try to play games to satisfy some weird thing inside yourself. Have a wonderful day~
  • Turings... remy 2012/12/10 20:15:32
    TuringsChild
    Of course you didn't... now that you know the true nature of this question. LOL
  • remy Turings... 2012/12/10 20:19:32
    remy
    +5
    Oh please......do you think the RAIN is some sort of plot to get YOU? Or traffic? "Oh, dear, someone out there is trying to kill me, so they found a way to back up traffic so they could trap me here and kill me. My gun is in the trunk, but if I get out, the snipers will shoot me...what to do, what to do...."
  • oldlady remy 2012/12/11 03:09:27
    oldlady
    +4
    LMAO!!!
  • remy oldlady 2012/12/11 03:20:20
  • oldlady remy 2012/12/11 03:24:40
  • Red 2012/12/09 23:41:31
  • ruralntex 2012/12/08 12:13:25
    None of the above
    ruralntex
    +1
    Riddle me this: Is the man constitutionally eligible to hold the office? He has never really proved he is. I don't wanna hear about the internet certificate of live birth. You don't have to be born in Hawaii to get one.
  • DuncanONeil 2012/12/08 05:34:15
    None of the above
    DuncanONeil
    +1
    Maybe!

    Maybe not!
  • Billyk75 2012/12/07 20:26:08
    Eh. I coulda told you THAT.
    Billyk75
    +1
    The majority of americans loves a rock star president no matter how corrupt and incompetent he is.
  • TuringsChild 2012/12/07 17:20:28
    Eh. I coulda told you THAT.
    TuringsChild
    Well, it's been 24 hrs now, so I can admit it. This was a trolling question. I wanted to demonstrate how 'tolerant' and 'caring' liberals really are. Look at all the snarky, hateful, prideful and downright arrogant posts I garnered in a single day. Instead of showing generosity in victory, practically every liberal that posted here was small minded and mean spirited. The hate literally oozed out of your pores. How sad that so few of you will use this revelation to stop and take stock of your own attitudes and judgments. Yes, Obama won. But at what cost to you?
  • askmike Turings... 2012/12/07 20:58:01
    askmike
    Another knee slapping joke! Keep them coming!
  • Nick Name 2012/12/07 04:00:09
    Pfft. Give it up. You LOST!
    Nick Name
    +4
    This is sick. Find something less crazy to obsess about.
    Obama won.
    Start selling the idea Obama wants a 3rd term. When that doesn't happen then you can congratulate yourself and claim victory. Like Donald Trump.
  • roxie 2012/12/07 03:34:25
    Pfft. Give it up. You LOST!
    roxie
    +1
    Obama Yes!
    "W's" 1st term... NONONO!
  • Elephant Lord 2012/12/07 03:34:22
    Pfft. Give it up. You LOST!
    Elephant Lord
  • BlytheSpirit~bn0 2012/12/07 02:04:18
    None of the above
    BlytheSpirit~bn0
    +2
    Haha. This was cute. I especially liked this part......."which also had a
    poll watcher dressed in Obama attire," OMG!!! Someone there was dressed in a suit and tie??? Nefarious behavior indeed.
  • askmike BlytheS... 2012/12/07 02:22:31 (edited)
    askmike
    +2
    I think what he meant was the poll watcher was not dressed like a rich white male. The part about the military votes not being counted was mentioned in the duffel blog. The duffel blog made the same remark in 2008. What makes his remark hilarious is the duffel blog clearly posts this notice on their web site: "Just about everthing on this website is satirical in nature. The content on this site is parody." So the host of this blog has made a double knee slapping post!
  • S123 2012/12/07 02:00:20
    Eh. I coulda told you THAT.
    S123
    +1
    Yes, he did.
  • kevjon 2012/12/07 01:58:36
    Eh. I coulda told you THAT.
    kevjon
    +1
    Every thing these liberals do is rotten, they have no moral values and cheating is a way of life for them. In the end maybe even they will see the wrong in all they do...some day.
  • roxie kevjon 2012/12/07 03:36:15
  • Lana 2012/12/07 01:34:12
    Pfft. Give it up. You LOST!
    Lana
    +3
    Boy you guys know NOTHING about election law now do ya. We worked much smarter and the American people just hated Mittens that never did give up his tax forms for the last ten years.
    As a American I do have one great idea for you and your kind, please move away fron the USA, we just have no time for idiots like you !
    Untill you can talk facts and not fiction you and your kind should just STFU, you are useless and stupid all at the same time. You sure do live behind the Orange curtin with the rest of the RWNJ's. You are not worth my time !!
  • roxie Lana 2012/12/07 03:38:12
    roxie
    +3
    reality They just don't get it!
  • chicago 2012/12/07 00:58:59
    Pfft. Give it up. You LOST!
    chicago
    +3
    Yup.

    And I don't even have to cut and paste my answer, to this cut and pasted question.
  • realist 2012/12/07 00:57:09 (edited)
    None of the above
    realist
    +1
    Well logically yes. But I don't think he won a fair fight when the entertainment industry and education system over the last 15-20 years has seen children grown up and families raised in an overwhelmingly Democratic discrete but propaganda-laden soup.
  • roxie realist 2012/12/07 03:40:31
    roxie
    phew
    Reality. not a 4 letter word!
  • realist roxie 2012/12/07 03:43:39
    realist
    Please elaborate

See Votes by State

The map above displays the winning answer by region.

News & Politics

2014/12/21 06:57:39

Hot Questions on SodaHead
More Hot Questions

More Community More Originals