Did Chic-Fil-A speak out against gay marriage just to sell chicken to conservatives?

I wouldn't doubt it. Lots of crazy things are done and said for money and publicity :/

that's a funny thing, the same could be said about amazon siding with the homo's

The only hate monger I know of is the person who made these answers. He just stated his opinion end of story.

ahhhhhhYUP!

Both. Am I the only hopeless dyslexic who reads that name as Chick-A-fill every time?? =[

Those are ducks lol.

i guess your right lol

id love five mins alone with him with a cheese grater two stapplers and a mach two saber blade ><

or maybe they were just stating there opinion

Gee, what a fine list of answer choices. Damned if you do; damned if you don't...

media equals money. he had an opinion, spends his money supportin hate groups, bit then turns around and gets his money back

He didn't "speak out against gay marriage." He was asked a question about his support for traditional marriage and he said that he did. Gay marriage was never brought up in the interview.

http://www.huffingtonpost.com...
http://www.huffingtonpost.com...
http://www.forbes.com/sites/d...

When you bring up the fact that you only support "traditional marriage" you are automatically commenting on gay marriage. It's just a nicer way of putting it. Everyone knows this, and if someone can't decipher that then they are either living under a rock or just flat out stupid.

When asked about supporting only families which involved one man and one woman he responded "Well, guilty as charged". His views are completely obvious. He may be playing coy, but he's entirely transparent.

He goes on to say "I think we are inviting god's judgement on our nation when we shake our fist at him and say 'we know better than you as to what constitutes a marriage'." I mean COME ON. He did this on purpose, he worded it in a coy way so he could step back and say "Oh no! That's not what a meant!" when sh*t hit the fan. His point is very very clear. He just didn't have the balls to say it outright.

It is not. The entire quote makes it clear he was speaking of the model of relationship, referring to a two parent household. It is convenient that not one of those sources points that fact out.

Please, stop letting media sources choose your views, do your own research. The comment that everyone was freaking out about happened 2 months before anyone said a word as well. This had nothing to do with logic, truth, or marriage and everything to do with attacking a specific institution for their religious beliefs. If you want to support marriage equality, join me in educating people about why we should support it, stop attacking people and strengthening their cause, which is all this does.

No one chooses my views. Couldn't I say the same to you? Don't ASSume things about a person you don't know. If I wasn't on my phone there would be a giant *facepalm* riiiight.... Here.

---
Anyway, my views have been shaped though my instincts, my research, those around me, my teachers, monks I have studied with, my parents, my experiences and MUCH more. No one person single handedly decides there own views. They are shaped by hundreds of factors throughout our lives The media is one small source of a world of information I have been exposed to. Saying one specific thing chooses a person's views for them is both idiotic, shallow, and asinine.

I don't care what everyone was freaking out about. I'm talking about recent quotes. Quotes which a baboon could decipher which had a very clear motive behind them.

Who's attacking? Clarifying what he was talking about is not attacking anyone.

This is the USA. Making money is the name of the game.

Maybe he's an undercover liberal (or something) and this is his plan to kill off conservatives by making them fat and giving them heart attacks. :D

LOL!!!

Conservatives & religious people flock their.... http://images.sodahead.com/pr...

We all know that conservatives eat chicken exclusively... they are all slaves to chicken...
they live, breathe, and walk around thinking about their next chicken sandwich fix...
Those conservatives are such mindless sheep, er... chicken, I mean...

It sure is funny how easily the gay agenda is played.

actually, it's kind of sad... I think

Yes, the gay agenda is sad.

...and once the Cons get tired of "supporting" them (through boredom or from being too fat to get through the door anymore) Chick-Fil-A will realize they've lost half their customer base.

It worked didn't it. The homosexuals were not a part of their customer base so why not use the butt packers as a great way to get free advertising. 65% of this nation thinks being gay is wrong. It was fabulous to watch the reported lines of people supporting our first amendment today. Sorry Occupoo this is what a productive demonstration looks like.

LOL mostly old people...

For your information, old people hold the most personal wealth, they are the demographic that matters. You think someone picking pennies out of the ditch in their twenties is what a business wants for a customer base?

No that old people are more likely to be racist & homophobic thats all....

Since when did not accepting deviant behavior become racist? Homophobic what a joke, no one is fearful of the gay agenda, just disgusted by it.

LOL no old people are more likely to be homophobic & racist...not that the people there are racist....deviant behavior to over dramatic religious people...
its actually normal/natural behavior.....but i guess you're religious...

So you think the 65% percent of society that report that homosexuality is wrong are overly religious?
Again what is racist about not accepting deviant behavior?
Normal behavior is defined by society, and homosexual behavior is not considered normal by society.

most likely are...im sure its not 65% either...im sure i read it was lower than that......NO i meant old people are more likely to be racist i dont get how you didnt get that by now......
it is considered normal just not by conservatives & religious idiots....

Why, would you say older people are more likely to be racist? You do understand it was their generation that brought about civil rights, don't you?

Homosexual behavior is not considered normal.

To you but to alot of people it is...most of the old people i know are raicst & since those old people are homophobic they are most likely racist too...
gay sex is normal for animals & since we are considered animals it would make it normal.....its also been around for over 4 billion years...

Homophobic, again what are they scared of, they are disgusted not fearful, time for an accurate use of language lesson for you.
You are judging a whole generation, that brought civil rights into society, as racist, based on the few you know? Wow seems a little infantile doesn't it. That is akin to me judging the whole of the gay agenda, by the filth gyrating at a gay pride parade.
Mammals are sexual opportunists, there is no preference. Any port in a storm. We are an elevated form of mammal, again with no predisposition to monogamy or sexual preference. We choose what gender we will have sex with. Hence deviant behavior.

If they are going to support discrimination they may as well be..anyone who goes to chic-fil-a is a waste of space who does not deserve to live on earth anymore....
you can't choose who you are attracted to...go have sex with men then??..report back what you find out....

Is it discrimination to not allow necrophilia? Is is discrimination to not allow pedophilia? Both are deviant sexual behaviors.
So you would kill all who opposed deviant behavior, that is a grand example of the tolerant left, now isn't it.
Why would I choose to have deviant sexual relations?

Again, I will type slowly so you can understand. There is no sexual predisposition in mammals, we are all sexual opportunists. You choose how you will behave, no one else chooses for you.

Both of those dont have two consenting adults idiot.....no i never said kill at all they just dont deserve to live on earth send them & you to the moon to live......
Humans dont choose who their attracted to or you could go out & have sex with men? have you has sex with both men & woman?? if you can choose then you should be open to it...