Quantcast

Dems Admit 0bama NOT Eligible

Annette 2012/06/23 22:25:55
Dems Admit Obama’s Not Eligible

June 23, 2012 By Doug Book
Weary of defending in court the Constitutional eligibility of their
man at 1600 Pennsylvania Avenue, the Democrat Party has finally admitted
Barack Obama is not qualified to be president of the United States– and
that it doesn’t matter.


According to a motion
filed by Party attorneys in a Tennessee eligibility lawsuit,
“…Defendants [the Tennessee Democrat Party and the Democrat National
Committee] assert that the Tennessee Democrat Party has the right to
nominate whoever it chooses to run as a candidate, including someone who
is not qualified for the office.”


In numerous previous lawsuits questioning the Constitutional
eligibility of Barack Hussein Obama, Democrats have maintained that
voters, not the Constitution, should be the final arbiters of
presidential eligibility. Though a disgraceful assertion on its face,
such mindless rambling was about all that desperate Democrat attorneys
had in their arsenals, apart from the perpetually employed “plaintiffs
lack standing” defense.



But now, the cat is out of the bag, and the true sentiments of
Democrat Party officials have finally been aired. It seems that,
according to the left, as long as the acting president has the requisite
contempt for the United States, is willing to work tirelessly to
destroy the national economy, and will ignore both the rule of law and
his Constitutional duty to enforce it, he is eminently qualified to hold
the country’s top job.


In February, Georgia Administrative Judge Michael Malihi ignored
Supreme Court precedent, made a shambles of case law, and distorted the
rulings of other courts in a pathetically obvious mission to find Barack
Obama eligible for the Georgia presidential ballot. Although the first
judge to decide an Obama eligibility case on the merits, his contempt
for an honest judicial process certainly did nothing to mend the rapidly
deteriorating reputation of the American legal system.


On Wednesday, United States District Judge S. Thomas Anderson joined a
long list of robed colleagues, ruling that plaintiffs in the Tennessee
case “lacked standing” to point out Obama’s Constitutional ineligibility
for the presidency. That is, plaintiffs could not claim sufficient
personal harm should the Manchurian Candidate remain in or be re-elected
to the White House.


Strange how the law works. After 3 ½ years of cynical disregard for
the borders, language, and culture of the United States, one would think
that some 240 million people have suffered “sufficient personal harm”
to claim legal standing for a crack at His Royal Highness in a court of
law! There are only 30 million illegals currently residing in the United
States, and those the Attorney General refers to as “his people” might
actually lack legal standing in the eyes of an honest arbiter.


At any rate, Democrats have finally admitted what the rest of us have
known for quite some time. Barack Obama is NOT qualified to hold the
job won for him by the national media in 2008. But it seems only the
voters will have the authority to reclaim it from him. God willing, the
vast majority who exercise that authority in November will be both
American and alive.
You!
Add Photos & Videos

Top Opinion

  • Temlakos~POTL~PWCM~JLA~☆ 2012/06/23 23:25:10
    Temlakos~POTL~PWCM~JLA~☆
    +6
    Who, then, has sufficient standing? And does the Constitution mean a thing?

    By the way: now that the Ladies of Mount Vernon have their hands on George Washington's personal annotated copy of the Constitution, it might be profitable to approach them and try to arrange some kind of research access...

Sort By
  • Most Raves
  • Least Raves
  • Oldest
  • Newest
Opinions

  • zbacku 2012/06/25 15:16:29
    zbacku
    +1
    I can't wait until Obama is kicked out in November.
  • Annette zbacku 2012/06/25 20:15:00
    Annette
    I hope he is kicked out before then!
  • Annette zbacku 2012/06/25 20:15:01
    Annette
    I hope he is kicked out before then!
  • star 2012/06/24 03:10:15
    star
    +2
    Crazy but that has been the way of The Democratic party for the last twenty years. I am anti-democrat since The Clinton Years.
  • safari 2012/06/24 02:27:43
    safari
    +3
    I can't wait to get rid of this asshat -

    ass hat obama
  • Annette safari 2012/06/24 02:30:42
    Annette
    +3
    I'd love to ship him off to GITMO wearing that hat. Good one, saf.
  • safari Annette 2012/06/24 18:16:08
    safari
    +1
    lol thanks ..
  • Temlakos~POTL~PWCM~JLA~☆ 2012/06/23 23:25:10
    Temlakos~POTL~PWCM~JLA~☆
    +6
    Who, then, has sufficient standing? And does the Constitution mean a thing?

    By the way: now that the Ladies of Mount Vernon have their hands on George Washington's personal annotated copy of the Constitution, it might be profitable to approach them and try to arrange some kind of research access...
  • Striker 2012/06/23 23:16:54
    Striker
    +6
    Voting Obama out will be good, but probably not good enough. He needs to be arrested for Treason and removed from all state's ballots.
  • Annette Striker 2012/06/23 23:17:28
    Annette
    +3
    You won't believe this! I am appalled - http://www.sodahead.com/unite...
    Wonder what 0vomit knows that we don't know?
  • Striker Annette 2012/06/24 13:25:41
    Striker
    Holy Crap! 319 comments, mostly saying true or not true.
    I tried searching Cook County Records, but without property address too much trouble. Seems for sure that address can be Googled with the millions of articles about Obama.
  • Primitive Christian 2012/06/23 22:52:08
    Primitive Christian
    +2
    Ok, so where in the motion do they "admit Obama not eligible?" I found no such admission.
  • Annette Primiti... 2012/06/23 23:23:10
    Annette
    What, you can't read a quote?

    “…Defendants [the Tennessee Democrat Party and the Democrat National
    Committee] assert that the Tennessee Democrat Party has the right to
    nominate whoever it chooses to run as a candidate, including someone who
    is not qualified for the office.”

    I guess in a feeble mind that does not apply to the president. Learn the Constitutional law on the subject!
  • Primiti... Annette 2012/06/23 23:32:00
    Primitive Christian
    +1
    I'm well aware of the Constitutional Law. The Democratic party is wrong it is necessary that he meet the Constitutional requirements, but this "quote" is nothing even close to an admission that President Obama is ineligible. At best you are inferring that it's an admission. No attorney anywhere would agree with you that this is an admission of anything.
  • CuppaT ... Primiti... 2012/06/23 23:53:03
    CuppaT   Child of God
    You must consider the source. They're still crying ib their beer over their loss in in 2008 and now they're running scared knowing full well they are going to lose again.
  • Primiti... CuppaT ... 2012/06/24 00:02:23
    Primitive Christian
    +1
    Well when it comes to voting against President Obama I am actually "one of them" but I don't like misinformation being purposely spread. This whole "birther" thing is ridiculous. I have reasons that I am voting against President Obama but at least they are honest and verifiable reasons. I have no problem with people voting either way as I know intelligent well meaning people can come to different conclusions with the same information, but I don't like falsehoods being propagated. And you are correct there are an awful lot of people who are still whining about the 2008 election.
  • CuppaT ... Primiti... 2012/06/24 00:09:15
    CuppaT   Child of God
    I agree. I didn't for anyone for President in 2008. Being Catholic I couldn't vote Obama and being Democrat I couldn' t vote McCain. Looks like I'm between the proverbial rock and a hard place again this year.
  • Annette CuppaT ... 2012/06/24 02:35:56
    Annette
    +1
    No, we are not going to lose again with or without an election. YOU are going to lose along with the entire nation, but you're too blind to see that. If anyone in the voting process thinks or says it does not matter if a person is eligible, that, my friend, is an admission of guilt to standing by the rule of law.
    With your thinking, even murder is acceptable if the government says so. Boy, some citizen you must be!
  • Annette Primiti... 2012/06/24 02:31:45
    Annette
    Whatever!

See Votes by State

The map above displays the winning answer by region.

News & Politics

2014/09/02 12:06:00

Hot Questions on SodaHead
More Hot Questions

More Community More Originals