Quantcast

DEMOCRATIC HYPOCRITES AND GUN CONTROL

SunShine 2013/01/26 17:37:10




















Writer David Codrea said he obtained a copy of the proposal before it was formally posted on the Library of Congress THOMAS database.


Feinstein staged weapons around her Thursday when she announced the introduction of the bill.


She has said she wants banned “sale, transfer, importation, or manufacturing of 120 specifically named firearms, certain other semiautomatic rifles, handguns, shotguns that can accept a detachable magazine and have one or more military characteristics; and semiautomatic rifles and handguns with a fixed magazine that can accept more than 10 rounds.”


Read the proposed bill.


She claims her plan will strengthen the 1994 ban by outlawing weapons that have a particular characteristic, such as a “thumbhole stock.” The 1994 ban eventually was dropped when law enforcement confirmed it wasn’t helping.


Feinstein also wants to outlaw ammunition magazines that take more than 10 rounds.


She claims it would protect “rights of existing gun owners” because it would grandfather weapons already legally owned and exempt “disabled” weapons.


But for any weapons that are “grandfathered,” she would demand that the owners be investigated, photographed and fingerprinted; the type and serial number of the weapon be registered and local law enforcement certify that it is legal.


The Washington Examiner points out that Feinstein’s plan would cost every owner of a semiautomatic rifle another $200 in taxes for weapons they already have purchased and on which they already have paid taxes.


The report said a $200 tax is imposed each time a National Firearms Act weapon is registered or transferred. “Presumably, each weapon registered as an NFA firearm would be subject to the same restrictions,” the report said.


It also points out that Feinstein’s ban on any transfers would include “assault” weapons, which means owners of semiautomatic rifles would be allowed to pay the tax and keep them until they die, when they would be forfeited to the government.


For support, Feinstein cites a letter to the editor on the American Journal of Public Health in which two people wrote that “when Maryland imposed a more stringent ban on assault pistols and high-capacity magazines in 1994, it led to a 55 percent drop in assault pistols recovered by the Baltimore Police Department.”


Read more at http://www.wnd.com/2013/01/find-out-whether-your-gun-is-on-ba...
DEMOCRATIC HYPOCRITES AND GUN CONTROL

You!
Add Photos & Videos

Top Opinion

  • Dwight PWCM 2013/01/26 17:53:47
    Dwight PWCM
    +13
    Letting Government determine the type weapon we "need" is like letting a burgerler determine the type of locks we can install.

    The purpose of armed citizens is to deter Government from taking total controll.

Sort By
  • Most Raves
  • Least Raves
  • Oldest
  • Newest
Opinions

  • kaZappoo 2013/01/26 23:44:01
    kaZappoo
    +2
    and again they divert attention to the real issue ,,

    the mentally ill & GUNS !
  • goatman112003 2013/01/26 23:23:40
    goatman112003
    +2
    This is disarming period. This is pure control. What kind of BS are they up to that they need this, it must be a real hummer.
  • Red Branch 2013/01/26 22:19:58
    Red Branch
    +3
    " ... a 55 % drop in assault pistols recovered ... "

    Is this supposed to mean something?

    If the police would choose to shove an assualt pistol down the nearest storm sewer, it would not be counted as recovered.
    The officer on the scene could turn the firearm over to whomever, and if it is not recorded, then it was not recovered.
    I am not saying anyone is corrupt, but I am saying that Feinstein is an idiot if she thinks we believe that statistic makes sense and has anything to do with anything.

    Pay $200 on firearms transfers. Well, it appears that the poor will once again do without. However, a multibillionaire like her and her ilk will have everything as usual.

    Feinstein has become a multi-billionaire while she has served in the Senate. Well, really her husband has become a multi-billionaire through his business deals with Communist China and we know that she is way to ethical to use her position to benefit him. NOT.
  • SunShine Red Branch 2013/01/26 22:38:12
    SunShine
    +2
    very true..Pelosi too.. big time
  • Red Branch SunShine 2013/01/26 22:47:51
    Red Branch
    +2
    and more and they have the masses convinced that they are for the poor people.
  • ~ The Rebel ~ 2013/01/26 19:36:06
    ~ The Rebel ~
    +3
    I have a better idea. Let's make it mandatory that everybody over 18 own a gun. That way they could go door to door to collect them. *sarcasm*

    Anybody know how you get removed from the concealed carry list since Feinstein claims she no longer has concealed weapon permit?

    http://thehill.com/blogs/blog...
  • dave b 2013/01/26 19:31:14
    dave b
    +5
    How's that elitist Liberal government working out for us? It isnt.
  • wtw 2013/01/26 19:04:03
    wtw
    +5
    Power and control is all the dems want. They think they know better than you on how to handle your life. Ignorant black people vote for these dems not realizing that they desire to enslave them more to the government! The more you give into government the more enslaved we become!
  • templer003 2013/01/26 19:00:56
    templer003
    +5
    Why is always do what we say and not as we do with these traitors ???
    Me thinks that a little 1776 will go a long way soon.........
    Given the Framers’ clear vision of a small and limited federal government, how did it become so large and all-encompassing? The first reason had been foreseen by Founding Father Samuel Adams (“The Father of the American Revolution”), who cautioned:

    If the liberties of America are ever completely ruined…it will in all probability be the consequence of a mistaken notion of prudence which leads men to acquiesce in measures of the most destructive tendency for the sake of present ease. 21

    The first step in losing control of the federal government was that it became easier and more convenient to “acquiesce” (i.e., give in) and let the federal government begin doing things never before permitted. The federal government then felt emboldened to enter additional areas – or to use a description provided by Thomas Jefferson, it began “working like gravity by night and by day, gaining a little today and a little tomorrow, and advancing its noiseless step like a thief, over the field of jurisdiction, until all shall be usurped.” 22

    This is the current situation, and citizens do not like it:

    64% of Americans believe that government is too big (6% b...

    Why is always do what we say and not as we do with these traitors ???
    Me thinks that a little 1776 will go a long way soon.........
    Given the Framers’ clear vision of a small and limited federal government, how did it become so large and all-encompassing? The first reason had been foreseen by Founding Father Samuel Adams (“The Father of the American Revolution”), who cautioned:

    If the liberties of America are ever completely ruined…it will in all probability be the consequence of a mistaken notion of prudence which leads men to acquiesce in measures of the most destructive tendency for the sake of present ease. 21

    The first step in losing control of the federal government was that it became easier and more convenient to “acquiesce” (i.e., give in) and let the federal government begin doing things never before permitted. The federal government then felt emboldened to enter additional areas – or to use a description provided by Thomas Jefferson, it began “working like gravity by night and by day, gaining a little today and a little tomorrow, and advancing its noiseless step like a thief, over the field of jurisdiction, until all shall be usurped.” 22

    This is the current situation, and citizens do not like it:

    64% of Americans believe that government is too big (6% believe it is too small, and only 25% believe that it is “the right size”), and only 35% believe that the government is operating in line with the U. S. Constitution. 23
    When asked to identify the biggest threat to the future of the country, 55% identified big government, 32% big business, and 10% big labor. 24
    70% of Americans favor “smaller government with fewer services and lower taxes” rather than “a more active government with more services and higher taxes.” 25
    (more)
  • SunShine templer003 2013/01/27 01:06:05
    SunShine
    +1
    excellent..
  • templer003 SunShine 2013/01/27 01:26:43
    templer003
    +1
    Thank you but all the credit should go to Mr. David Barton founder of Wall builders, if ever you want o know what the founders thought or said then this is the site to use..
  • SunShine templer003 2013/01/27 05:50:24
    SunShine
    +1
    thanks for the info.. appreciated..
  • templer003 SunShine 2013/01/27 07:41:54
  • momma-on-the-hit-list 2013/01/26 18:47:53
    momma-on-the-hit-list
    +6
    Maybe they should all read this. Clear and intended reasons why the people should NEVER be without the ability to defend themselves. From animal's, criminal's and Gov (criminal's) of any kind.
    http://www.madisonbrigade.com...
  • momma-on-the-hit-list 2013/01/26 18:42:21 (edited)
    momma-on-the-hit-list
    +5
    Watch how it's worded, they have been hoodwinking us for far to long. Go back to your rock "Dianne" Had to "fix" her name couldn't just be a "normal" Diane.

    http://www.assaultweapon.info/
  • gldynmd BTO-t-BCRA-F 2013/01/26 18:28:42
    gldynmd BTO-t-BCRA-F
    +6
    They make me sick. Un-American hypocrites.
  • SK-pro scramnesty 2013/01/26 18:14:02 (edited)
    SK-pro scramnesty
    +9
    No surprise they would say they won't confiscate weapons before election but no that they won...... good little lying nazis aren't they?
  • stowles SK-pro ... 2013/01/26 20:54:18
    stowles
    +3
    let no tragedy go to waste...
  • ☆astac☆~PWCM 2013/01/26 17:55:24
    ☆astac☆~PWCM
    +12
    disarm the public


    THE TIME HAS COME WHERE WE HAVE TO FIGHT BACK
  • Dwight PWCM 2013/01/26 17:53:47
    Dwight PWCM
    +13
    Letting Government determine the type weapon we "need" is like letting a burgerler determine the type of locks we can install.

    The purpose of armed citizens is to deter Government from taking total controll.

See Votes by State

The map above displays the winning answer by region.

News & Politics

2014/04/23 13:38:27

Hot Questions on SodaHead
More Hot Questions

More Community More Originals