
Debt Deal: Is $2.4T Over 10 Years Enough?
SodaHead Politics
2011/08/01 19:00:00
|
|
|||||
|
14 votes
|
|
5% | |||
|
224 votes
|
|
76% | |||
|
58 votes
|
|
20% | |||
You're probably not gonna believe this, but the members of Congress actually did it.
They came through and agreed on a debt ceiling plan, and just in the nick of time. Like one of those old movie serials where the hero is teetering on the precipice of death one week and walks away without a scratch the next, their game of financial chicken looks like it will have a happy ending (at press time a vote was still pending).
According to The Hill, even as Senate Majority Democrat Leader Harry Reid signed off on the deal -- which would cut the deficit by about $2.4 trillion and raise the debt ceiling by a similar amount, while cutting spending by $1.2 trillion up front (a select committee will get together "later" to find the other $1.6 trillion in cuts) -- Republican House Speaker John Boehner could still scuttle it over fears that it cuts too much from Pentagon budgets.
Reid and House Minority Leader Nancy Pelosi agreed to support the measure, but they, too, may have to twist the arms of some of their caucus, who may balk at the fact that it doesn't raise any additional tax revenue.
Even though it kicks the can down the road on the extra $1.6 trillion in cuts, the deal has an automatic trigger that will implement $1.2 trillion in spending cuts if the select committee gets deadlocked.
The apparent deal maker was an agreement between President Obama and Senate Republican Leader Mitch McConnell to divide the automatic cuts evenly between defense and non-defense programs. Also, though Medicare cuts made the final deal (and would be triggered as a penalty if the committee fails to produce a package), beneficiaries would not feel the impact, but instead those trims would hit health care providers and insurance companies via lower payments.
They came through and agreed on a debt ceiling plan, and just in the nick of time. Like one of those old movie serials where the hero is teetering on the precipice of death one week and walks away without a scratch the next, their game of financial chicken looks like it will have a happy ending (at press time a vote was still pending).
According to The Hill, even as Senate Majority Democrat Leader Harry Reid signed off on the deal -- which would cut the deficit by about $2.4 trillion and raise the debt ceiling by a similar amount, while cutting spending by $1.2 trillion up front (a select committee will get together "later" to find the other $1.6 trillion in cuts) -- Republican House Speaker John Boehner could still scuttle it over fears that it cuts too much from Pentagon budgets.
Reid and House Minority Leader Nancy Pelosi agreed to support the measure, but they, too, may have to twist the arms of some of their caucus, who may balk at the fact that it doesn't raise any additional tax revenue.
Even though it kicks the can down the road on the extra $1.6 trillion in cuts, the deal has an automatic trigger that will implement $1.2 trillion in spending cuts if the select committee gets deadlocked.
The apparent deal maker was an agreement between President Obama and Senate Republican Leader Mitch McConnell to divide the automatic cuts evenly between defense and non-defense programs. Also, though Medicare cuts made the final deal (and would be triggered as a penalty if the committee fails to produce a package), beneficiaries would not feel the impact, but instead those trims would hit health care providers and insurance companies via lower payments.





















Does our federal government really believe that we're gonna buy that? Oh yea, we don't have to because we as the american taxpayers (the one's who are footing the bill) don't have a say!! That's right I forgot. Sorry guys. My mistake.
On second thought, I don't know how congress accomplished anything. They did nothing to help our country's biggest problem: SPENDING.
Last time I checked, cutting spending doesn't include a raise in the amount of money our country is allowed to spend. That's called RAISING spending. Mmkay?
Now Barry and friends can continue spending us unhindered into the great abyss and focus on bigger and better things like raising taxes on anyone with change left in their pockets. Not to mention, continue on with his five year Presidential re-election campaign.
http://www.goooh.com
Get involved if you love your country and your children.
Quit providing services for all of the illegals in this nation who don't, never have, and never will be paying into our tax system. Good grief, look what they've done to California!
My FB fan page if you are interested.
Yes about half don't and about 22% of that half are retirees as you said do some research....
I can't help your dumbass assumption concerning my view on illegals thats part of the problem when bring up something without really knowing the person's views...
Sorry I didn't point out that you were totally wrong about 50% don't paying taxes and once again where or when did I ever say retirees never paid taxes?
I didn't so there you go again claiming something I didn't say that's stupid and dishonest.. What is wrong with you people...
We should tax the wealthest more because as a percentage of GDP (14.4) taxes are at a 61 year low per Bloomberg..
The CBO states the Stimulis saved or created 3000+ jobs and several economist will admit it kept us from going into a Depression.. If that's failure to you its not to those 3000+... The GOP has done more then its share of bankrupting this country from Reagan to W.. The deficit was at 5T when came took office and was 10T+ when you left.. He left with two wars, drug plan, tax cuts, etc which Obama and us are still paying for...
Job killing bush tax cuts....that sure does sound like an oxymoron. Because raising taxes would create jobs.......I'd like to see an explanation of how that works. Go!
Would you like the real skinny on who's to blame? My mother was working in the industry- the Subprime Mortgage industry- the one's who gave not-so-credit worthy people loans so they can buy houses, then they couldn't pay their house note and went under financially. It's no wonder. Everything was built upon layers of failure. Congress even supported irresponsible buying-go ahead take out that second mortgage even though you can't afford it. Said it's okay to have a bigger house.....and it's not too much of a surprise either because the government is still living that way....Waaay way beyond it's means. When the government lets the people and big business know it's okay to live beyond your means, then everybody does it. Then the people turn around and blame the government. It's really everybody's fault, not just one party, not just Bush, not just Obama, but EVERYONE.
http://www.factcheck.org/2008...
http://www.mcclatchydc.com/25...