LOL, I tend to think we will see far more of the liberal "love" displayed here as we get closer to election time. People who are cornered tend to be nasty.
Will the whitehouse back their man? Well they sure wont tell him to stop!! They will try to put juuusssst enough distance between him and them to look ok to the general public while behind the scenes doing a high five!!
Dan Savage Calls Pro-Romney Gays ‘F*ggots’
Evil 1
2012/06/21 16:45:01
Today, the Republican gay group GOProud endorsed Mitt Romney for the presidency, explaining that Romney was “light years better” than Obama, particularly on the economy. “Most gay Americans – like their straight counterparts – are not better off than they were 4 years ago,” stated Jimmy LaSalvia, GOProud’s executive director. “The truth is that gay people are living in the disastrous failed Obama economy too … President Obama and his friends on the left want this election to be about divisive social issues, because the President’s record on jobs and the economy is indefensible.”
This is hardly an outrageous statement – the fact is that many gays and lesbians around America care less about President Obama’s support for same-sex marriage than they do about his disastrous mishandling of the economy.
But according to Dan Savage, an ardent Obama supporter, these gay Republicans are “f*ggots.” This morning, he tweeted, “The GOP’s house faggots grab their ankles, right on cue … Pathetic.” (See video below)
Two gay slurs in one Tweet. The gay left must be proud of their self-appointed spokesman. So must the Obama Administration, which has labeled this massive bully a hero of the anti-bullying movement, invited him to the White House, and cut videos on behalf of his It Gets Better Project. There's no worse form of anti-gay bullying than to use slurs like the one Savage did here. Will the White House continue to back their man?
Read More: http://www.breitbart.com/Big-Journalism/2012/06/20...
Top Opinion
-
Sheila 2012/06/21 16:54:41
Break ranks and they'll be just as racist, sexist, homophobic as they love to accuse everyone else of being.
And nothing you say at this point can justify your worthless initial statement on this thread. Your initial statement had no bearing on the premise of the post and was totally out of line as well as juvenile.
as far as my initial comment - it is undisputed that Breitbart was a demonstrated prevaricator, making his pronouncements, or pronouncements "in his absence" essentially worthless ..
As I stated previously. I will not lower myself to your juvenile and pathetic level.
Breitbart was a liar. The fact that he is dead doesn't alter that fact or redeem him.
http://www.slate.com/articles...
As for trying to make this a political issue. Anyone regardless of party affiliation would be a bigot and low life if they posted the vile, disguting, childish, worthless BS that you have. So that attempt to tap dance around the truth doesn't work. You are without a doubt one of the most worthless, vile bigots I have ever encountered here on Sodahead. A true example of a low life dreg of society.
And if you think using the term 'homo' is not vile, disgusting and unacceptable when referring to gays then why not put up a post and ask that question. I would venture to say you will realize if you do so that you are wrong and that you are as I have stated a worthless, vile low life and bigot.
Will the whitehouse back their man? Well they sure wont tell him to stop!! They will try to put juuusssst enough distance between him and them to look ok to the general public while behind the scenes doing a high five!!