Quantcast

D-Day For Gun Control

SharonJohnson 2012/07/18 03:27:53
Time to make a stand and stop the radical agenda
2nd admendment our rights
We the People
You!
Add Photos & Videos
Click Here To Sign The Petition To Stop The US From Signing The Arms Trade Treaty!

Without much fanfare and with as little publicity as possible, Secretary of State Hillary Clinton will go to New York City to sign the Arms Trade Treaty (ATT), now in the final stages of negotiation at the U.N. The treaty marks the beginning of an international crusade to impose gun controls on the United States and repeal our Second Amendment rights.

The ATT is nominally geared toward the purpose of stopping international arms sales to gangs, criminals and violent groups. But, as is so often the case with U.N. treaties, this is merely a convenient facade behind which to conceal the ATT’s true intent: to force gun control on the United States.

Secretary Clinton will doubtless succeed in inserting language into the treaty asserting that it in no way is meant to restrict our right to bear arms. But even this language will be meaningless in the face of the overall construct set up by the treaty.

The ATT is to be administered by an International Support Unit (ISU), which will ensure that “parties [to the treaty] take all necessary measures to control brokering activities taking place within [their] territories … to prevent the diversion of exported arms to the illicit market or to unintended end users.”

The ISU will determine whether nations are in compliance with this requirement and will move to make sure that they do, indeed, take “all necessary measures.” This requirement will inexorably lead to gun registration, restrictions on ownership and, eventually, even outright bans on firearms.

Former U.N. Ambassador John Bolton said it best: “After the treaty is approved and comes into force, you will find out that it has this implication or that implication and that it requires Congress to adopt legislation to restrict the ownership of firearms.”

Bolton explains that “the administration knows that it cannot obtain this kind of legislation in purely a domestic context. They will use an international agreement to get domestically what they couldn’t get otherwise.”

The treaty makes no sense otherwise, except as a circuitous vehicle to achieve gun control in the United States. The vast majority of all small arms and light arms exports (the ostensible focus of the treaty) are from sales by the governments of the United States, Russia, China, Germany and Israel. Individual or corporate arms trafficking is a distinct minority. But it is to absorb the brunt of the treaty’s regulations.

Insofar as the treaty restricts governmental action, it bars governments from arming “illicit” groups in other nations. This provision could well be interpreted to ban U.S. arms sales to Iranian or Syrian dissidents. It could even be used by China to stop us from selling arms to Taiwan, since the U.N. does not recognize Taiwan as a nation, but rather an entity occupying territory that should belong to China.

And let’s not forget how well the United States has done in reducing murders and other crimes despite the absence of comprehensive gun controls and bans. In 1993, there were 24,350 homicides in the United States. Last year, there were 13,576 (despite a growth of 60 million in the population). Only 9,000 of these murders involved a firearm. (Less than one-third of the highway deaths each year in the country.)

Obama has left gun control off his legislative agenda so far. Now his strategy becomes apparent: Use international treaties to achieve it.

And bear in mind that under the Supremacy Clause of our Constitution, we would be obliged to enforce the ATT despite the Second Amendment. International treaties have the force of constitutional law in the United States.

If it is ratified during the lame-duck session of the Senate this year, then nothing can ever change it. Goodbye, Second Amendment.

Right now we need 34 courageous Republican senators to step up and demand that Hillary not sign the treaty, and indicate their intention to vote against its ratification if it is submitted. Only such an action can stop this treachery in its tracks.

Click Here to sign the petition to stop the US from signing the Arms Trade Treaty!

Add a comment above

Top Opinion

  • Tee Quake 2012/07/18 03:55:18
    All of the above
    Tee Quake
    +4
    I'll be god damned the day I live to see the likes of any clinton and the obanana man take away my Constitutional rights using the UN. It' completely disgusting and these rank socialists will only push us real Americans a little further before all hell breaks lose Oh, did that sound like a threat, my mistake Now eat your processed eggs and UN orange juice from China Groves

Sort By
  • Most Raves
  • Least Raves
  • Oldest
  • Newest
Opinions

  • Ronzo 2012/07/26 17:05:08 (edited)
    All of the above
    Ronzo
    I want our elected officials who oppose gun ownership to stop being hypocritical, over 93% of them have a minimum of one unregistered gun in their home. There was another shooting in Aurora, Colorado, in April of this year. It didn’t get much media attention, maybe because someone with a gun killed the gunman before he could finish his rampage:
    CHECK THIS LINK http://politicaloutcast.com/2...
    OBAMA'S HIDDEN CRIME'S, executive order to seal his records, school, college, Police etc. And he attacks Romney, open your Records Barak Hussien Obama.
  • Jaroslav Dantes 2012/07/20 22:46:55
    Time to make a stand and stop the radical agenda
    Jaroslav Dantes
    its good idea.
  • Tony Cicarella 2012/07/19 02:43:22
    Time to make a stand and stop the radical agenda
    Tony Cicarella
    It's unlikely that the Senate would ratify it. This is doomed, thank god, to go the same route as the law of the sea treaty. But we must remain ever diligent. These damn libs r constantly working to take away our individual soveriegnty.
  • Andrew 2012/07/18 22:35:51
    All of the above
    Andrew
    No one should have their right to defend themself and their families from dangerous people away.
  • Tennessee3501 2012/07/18 21:41:57
    2nd admendment our rights
    Tennessee3501
    Even President Obama supports the 2nd Amendment constitutional rights of Michelle to "bare arms."
  • ♥dreamer-leigh♥ 2012/07/18 21:37:57
    All of the above
    ♥dreamer-leigh♥
    Hillary as well as Bill have always been anti military so why the surprise to have this pass through so secretly until recent? Thing that is troubling though is this is done by way of "treaty", which means it cannot be undone....so here we go again, one more step towards socialism. Wake up people!!
  • none 2012/07/18 19:52:03
    Time to make a stand and stop the radical agenda
    none
    Done!
  • Ron in Oregon 2012/07/18 19:44:03
    All of the above
    Ron in Oregon
    It's a fact no matter what the libs think.
    July 27th is first day of our third period of infamy.
  • frank 2012/07/18 17:26:58
    All of the above
    frank
    If we give up our guns who will save this Country next time Europe tries to own us.
  • gocar frank 2012/07/19 16:55:20
    gocar
    You would not be lucky enough to have Europe own you. Save the country indeed, are you nuts? Your corporate bosses will see to it that you can buy all the guns you like because they control your minds not your bodies.
  • frank gocar 2012/07/19 17:12:35
    frank
    You make me laugh. If we keep borrowing 40% of what we spend we will be owned by Europe and that will not be good.
  • merlinskiss 2012/07/18 16:03:28
    All of the above
    merlinskiss
    +1
    Chalk all of this up to continuing globalization and the destruction it does to the American way of life.
  • LibertyCaroline 2012/07/18 15:14:26
    All of the above
    LibertyCaroline
    +2
    Self defense is a basic human right, and one I will fight for, along for every liberty I have left in this country.
  • jcadla 2012/07/18 14:43:53
  • Maddog 2012/07/18 14:20:28
    Time to make a stand and stop the radical agenda
    Maddog
    +1
    Signed the petition and sent letters to my state representatives in Congress.
  • Mary Ann 2012/07/18 13:12:15
    All of the above
    Mary Ann
    +3
    Obama quietly signed his name to an Executive Order on Friday, allowing the White House to control all private communications in the country in the name of national security.

    President Obama released his latest Executive Order on Friday, July 6, a 2,205-word statement offered as the “Assignment of National Security and Emergency Preparedness Communications Functions.” And although the president chose not to commemorate the signing with much fanfare, the powers he provides to himself and the federal government under the latest order are among the most far-reaching yet of any of his executive decisions.

    “The Federal Government must have the ability to communicate at all times and under all circumstances to carry out its most critical and time sensitive missions,” the president begins the order. “Survivable, resilient, enduring and effective communications, both domestic and international, are essential to enable the executive branch to communicate within itself and with: the legislative and judicial branches; State, local, territorial and tribal governments; private sector entities; and the public, allies and other nations.”
  • DS in Oak Ridge NC 2012/07/18 11:34:09 (edited)
    All of the above
    DS in Oak Ridge NC
    +2
    The Right to Bear Arms is a Constitutionally protected right, but Rights - as Freedom - must constantly be defended from encroachment and plain old radical agendas. Treaties not approved by sufficient margin in the Senate are not binding - no matter what our new-age constitutional student/re-writer/editor in Chief says about it on the stump. Signed!
  • Ron in ... DS in O... 2012/07/18 19:36:30
    Ron in Oregon
    Check it out treaties trumps the constitution until a new president says NO to it.
  • Old Timer 2012/07/18 10:58:35
    All of the above
    Old Timer
    +2
    Signed
  • Tedster 2012/07/18 07:30:08 (edited)
  • Ron in ... Tedster 2012/07/18 19:37:51
    Ron in Oregon
    No problem, just wait for the news on July 27th.
  • Tedster Ron in ... 2012/07/18 22:26:48
    Tedster
    Is there more to that or am I supposed to guess?
  • Ron in ... Tedster 2012/07/19 19:13:25
    Ron in Oregon
    I thought you were privy to the news.
    Hillary will sign the U N documents on July 27th
    Obama has agreed that she sign them.
  • Tedster Ron in ... 2012/07/19 22:25:34
    Tedster
    Ok Ron, pay attention for Christ sake. Any international treaty affecting the US has to be ratified by a 2/3rds vote of the Senate. And no, the treaty doesn't even exist yet. Go to Factcheck or Snopes and do your homework so you can sleep at night. You'll feel better and will know what you're talking about instead of letting your ill-informed fears run away with you.
  • dallasjoe 2012/07/18 06:19:33
    We the People
    dallasjoe
    +1
    DEALS with international trade of Arms Jut put down the crack pipe and exhale
  • Tim Upham 2012/07/18 04:50:29
    We the People
    Tim Upham
    +1
    I just use a sling shot.
  • Herb 2012/07/18 04:16:12
    Time to make a stand and stop the radical agenda
    Herb
    +3
    did my duty lets go agianst this destiable treaty to take the 2nd amendment rights away from us.
  • Striker 2012/07/18 04:07:34
    All of the above
    Striker
    +1
    WHEN does this go to our Senate?
  • Red_Horse 2012/07/18 03:59:17
  • Tee Quake 2012/07/18 03:55:18
    All of the above
    Tee Quake
    +4
    I'll be god damned the day I live to see the likes of any clinton and the obanana man take away my Constitutional rights using the UN. It' completely disgusting and these rank socialists will only push us real Americans a little further before all hell breaks lose Oh, did that sound like a threat, my mistake Now eat your processed eggs and UN orange juice from China Groves
  • Tedster Tee Quake 2012/07/18 07:38:03
    Tedster
    You're completely ignorant and gullible and must've slept through civics class in high school if you don't know better than this. It's a litmus test for "are you a moron?"
  • BobbyOdd Tedster 2012/07/18 10:13:15
    BobbyOdd
    +2
    well. you are sure a snotty jerk!
  • Tedster BobbyOdd 2012/07/18 22:21:59
  • BobbyOdd Tedster 2012/07/19 09:56:58
    BobbyOdd
    +1
    and you are STILL a snotty jerk!
  • Tedster BobbyOdd 2012/07/19 22:26:27 (edited)
    Tedster
    Whatever, but I know the facts and don't lose sleep over BS that can't happen.
  • BobbyOdd Tedster 2012/07/19 23:21:28
    BobbyOdd
    Look. A lot of things that can't happen have happened under this president. I cannot believe it all, but it is happening. I don't understand how the NSA has not arrested Obama for leaking national secrets through the press, for not being forthcoming on the gun walking. hell! They won't even answer congress' questions! He should be in jail by now. He does things through executive order that he doesn't have the power to do by the constitution....but he continues and nobody is stopping him. I see these things happening every day and you don't think the UN thing can happen? I think you are a fool.
  • Tedster BobbyOdd 2012/07/20 07:57:01
    Tedster
    And you're someone who obviously gets their fear based "facts" from Rash Limppole, Glenn Beck, WND, Judicial Watch and Alex Jones. Res ipsa loquiter.
  • BobbyOdd Tedster 2012/07/20 19:59:51
    BobbyOdd
    I read. You should learn.
  • Tedster BobbyOdd 2012/07/23 07:24:25
    Tedster
    You read what? WND, Judicial Watch and Townhall.com? Bully for you but BS is still BS no matter how you consume it.
  • BobbyOdd Tedster 2012/07/23 09:17:22
    BobbyOdd
    When the civil war comes, you are doomed. Because you have a flaw that will find you out. You can't stop yourself from running your mouth. You will seal your fate. I smile for your future.

See Votes by State

The map above displays the winning answer by region.

News & Politics

2013/05/22 19:34:19

Hot Questions on SodaHead
More Hot Questions

More Community More Originals