But I think we must do something about all the lung damage and diseases and death caused by smoking. Smoking marijuana gets people used to smoking and makes tobacco use more likely. I had friends in England who mixed tobacco and marijuana and made combined cigarettes. This would lead to nicotine addiction.
Rather than the negative route of outlawing smoking or cigarettes, I would like to see a variety of edible products on the market. Google THC pills to see one route to go. Marijuana (dried leaves), hashish (resin) or THC (active chemical) can be cooked into many products, such as cookies, candy, gum. Eating it is much less damaging than smoking it.
Current legislation in California to decriminalize marijuana and treat it essentially like alcohol, your thoughts?
Moose
2009/02/23 22:50:10
|
|
|||||
|
312 votes
|
|
71% | |||
|
49 votes
|
|
11% | |||
|
37 votes
|
|
8% | |||
|
40 votes
|
|
9% | |||
California state Assemblyman Tom Ammiano (D-San Francisco) today announced the introduction of legislation to tax and regulate marijuana in a manner similar to alcoholic beverages. The bill, the first of its kind ever introduced in California, would create a regulatory structure similar to that used for beer, wine, and liquor, permitting taxed sales to adults while barring sales to or possession by those under 21.
Estimates based on federal government statistics have shown marijuana to be California’s top cash crop, valued at approximately $14 billion in 2006 — nearly twice the combined value of the state’s number two and three crops, vegetables ($5.7 billion) and grapes ($2.6 billion) — in spite of massive “eradication” efforts that wipe out an average of nearly 36,000 cultivation sites per year without making a dent in this underground industry.
Ammiano introduced the measure at a San Francisco press conference this morning, saying, “With the state in the midst of an historic economic crisis, the move towards regulating and taxing marijuana is simply common sense. This legislation would generate much needed revenue for the state, restrict access to only those over 21, end the environmental damage to our public lands from illicit crops, and improve public safety by redirecting law enforcement efforts to more serious crimes,” said Ammiano. “California has the opportunity to be the first state in the nation to enact a smart, responsible public policy for the control and regulation of marijuana.”
“It is simply nonsensical that California’s largest agricultural industry is completely unregulated and untaxed,” said Marijuana Policy Project California policy director Aaron Smith, who also spoke at the news conference. “With our state in an ongoing fiscal crisis — and no one believes the new budget is the end of California’s financial woes — it’s time to bring this major piece of our economy into the light of day.”
Independent experts from around the world, from President Nixon’s National Commission on Marijuana and Drug Abuse in 1972 to a Canadian Senate special committee in 2002, have long contended that criminalizing marijuana users makes little sense, given that marijuana is less addictive, much less toxic, and far less likely to induce aggression or violence than alcohol. For example, in an article in the December 2008 Canadian Journal of Psychiatry, Australian researcher Stephen Kisely noted that “penalties bear little relation to the actual harm associated with cannabis.”
Estimates based on federal government statistics have shown marijuana to be California’s top cash crop, valued at approximately $14 billion in 2006 — nearly twice the combined value of the state’s number two and three crops, vegetables ($5.7 billion) and grapes ($2.6 billion) — in spite of massive “eradication” efforts that wipe out an average of nearly 36,000 cultivation sites per year without making a dent in this underground industry.
Ammiano introduced the measure at a San Francisco press conference this morning, saying, “With the state in the midst of an historic economic crisis, the move towards regulating and taxing marijuana is simply common sense. This legislation would generate much needed revenue for the state, restrict access to only those over 21, end the environmental damage to our public lands from illicit crops, and improve public safety by redirecting law enforcement efforts to more serious crimes,” said Ammiano. “California has the opportunity to be the first state in the nation to enact a smart, responsible public policy for the control and regulation of marijuana.”
“It is simply nonsensical that California’s largest agricultural industry is completely unregulated and untaxed,” said Marijuana Policy Project California policy director Aaron Smith, who also spoke at the news conference. “With our state in an ongoing fiscal crisis — and no one believes the new budget is the end of California’s financial woes — it’s time to bring this major piece of our economy into the light of day.”
Independent experts from around the world, from President Nixon’s National Commission on Marijuana and Drug Abuse in 1972 to a Canadian Senate special committee in 2002, have long contended that criminalizing marijuana users makes little sense, given that marijuana is less addictive, much less toxic, and far less likely to induce aggression or violence than alcohol. For example, in an article in the December 2008 Canadian Journal of Psychiatry, Australian researcher Stephen Kisely noted that “penalties bear little relation to the actual harm associated with cannabis.”
Top Opinion
-
mikenassau 2009/03/08 16:01:39It's about time!






















marijuana like alcohol.By decriminalizing it would help their
economy..I don't see why not.
Likewise, I have several friends that are alcoholics and one of them was a married man with two young boys about 12 and 14 and an absolutely wonderful dedicated wife of whom he would beat the hell out of every time he came home drunk, and that was way too often.
I like to think that I helped him get over his problem, and I am once again very thankful that I was always able to control it and finally gave it up completely about 4 years ago.
I don't like the idea of having anything else on the market competing with alcohol but at the same time I am against government intervention into our private lives. We have too many rules and regulations in our private lives and NOT enough regulation and oversight in our government.
Maybe the best thing to do is to do NOTHING. Don't make it LEGAL but at the same time don't make it illegal. Just leave it to the people to decide for themselves. If they want to use it fine, if they don't then that should also be fine.
Make it legal and tax it like tobacco!
This and Taxing Churchs will make us rich!
It will also help the economy if we tax and regulate this big time..
and neither does homosexuality either, just for the record
biologically, other than blocking short term memory synapses temporarily and slowing the sperm cells of men during use, there are no negative impacts, even on a fetus in the womb
trust me, if their were, we would know about it by now