Cultural Stereotypes: Superficially Humorous but Potentially Harmful
Cultural stereotypes may seem humorous but they can harm people. While many people understand and accept this as true, a "case study" approach, in the form of personal testimony, is often more valuable than a truckload of research.
This article is about my own personal experience with stereotypes. I rarely write in the first person, but this is a topic that merits a deviation from my journalistic practice of assuming a neutral voice. What I have to say is valuable to anyone interested in cross-cultural communication, because stereotypes are an extreme example of cross-cultural miscommunication.
Stereotypes are Distorted Taxonomies
Most likely, all of us grew up hearing comments from our parents or peers about certain individuals or the way they acted. At some point we began to wonder why our parents or friends had said something awful or funny about a person having to do with their being gay, Jewish, Black, Latino, Chinese or a member of some other identifiable social or ethnic category.
When we were young, we probably didn't have a name for this sort of comment, but as we grew up we learned to label such comments as stereotyping or bigotry. Stereotypes are generated by ignorance and fear of a person or group that is different from the observer. When we first heard the comments, we may have found them funny, even if we realized their inherent cruelty.
On one level, people need to classify everything they encounter in order to know how to deal with them and define themselves as members of their own group. Thus, in certain social situations stereotypes serve to provide "answers" to questions about how we should act toward others. The problem is that stereotypes are distorted taxonomies: incorrect maps of the sociocultural landscape. Just as a distorted map would cause a traveler to become lost, so do false impressions about people and groups cause individuals and indeed, whole societies to lose their moral compass.
The Psyche of a Group
Growing up in Cartagena, Colombia, where the local population is overwhelmingly African Colombian, I heard the African Colombians telling jokes about other African Colombians, or the Cartageneros telling jokes about how lazy the Cartageneros are, or how the rest of the Caribbean Coast of Colombia is just one big patio for a party. Although it wasn't true, it was funny to hear at the time. One aspect of culture in the northern part of Colombia is to tell self-consciously mocking jokes about one's own type.
Despite the seemingly harmless nature of such joking, stereotypes can sink into people's real image of themselves and do real harm. When stereotypes sink into the psyche of a group and they come to define themselves by that stereotype, a whole culture is harmed.
One example of how a stereotype can erupt into violence can be found in the murder of a teacher named Rolando Perez . When he was murdered, everyone spoke of the act as a crime of passion instead of as the hate crime that it was. I offer the following translation of a portion of the local media's coverage of this crime. The police Coronel of Cartagena said “At any rate, this fellow lived a dissolute life. He was promiscuous. As a gay man, he had a lot of lovers.” The Coronel was unable to see the way in which a stereotype about gays could be clouding his own professional judgment in dealing with the case. The sexual orientation of the victim was elevated to such a level of importance that it explained away, even justified murder -- despite the fact that he was one of the most respected teachers in the city. He was known for his ability to inspire his students to reach their full intellectual potential.
The Rolando case demonstrates how we may recognize the negative impact of stereotypes when seen from a comfortable distance, but we may not be aware of the ones we are culturally immersed in. We may not be aware of it, but this case should remind us that even if the person we are joking with is our best friend, brother, sister or uncle, we all absorb stereotypes in ways that could manifest themselves in passive, or worse, active aggression toward people who are different from us or our group.
Stereotypes in Mainstream Society
We can blame our parents. We can blame society. But in the final analysis, the only people we can control are ourselves.
I am not advocating burying our heads in the sand in some form of smug political correctness. As I mentioned at the beginning of this article, stereotypes are part of the social dynamics and humor of every civilization of the world. We see them in popular entertainment on television: on Comedy Central, for instance. Stereotypes are the stuff that stock characters are made of, such as the “magical negro ” an African-American man who helps a white man throughout a story. The Jewish mother stereotype is used widely in comedies such as The Nanny, Will & Grace, South Park and to a lesser extent (surprisingly) in Seinfeld. The question we need to ask ourselves, individually and collectively, as the media exploits stereotyping in the name of humor, is whether the negative consequences of stereotypes is disproportionately greater than the laughs they generate.
Another example more familiar to people in the US is the crime of Matthew Sheppard, or that of Brandon Teena, in which both were victims of the stereotypes that surround the gay community. These two people were victims of fear and bigotry from others who did not want them in their communities. What is worse, religion was used to sustain the moral values of the communities in which these crimes took place. While religion is a powerful unifying and spiritual force, these are examples of how it can be used almost as a murder weapon, generating or justifying fear and hatred, or as an accessory after the fact to assuage guilty consciences in the communities where these crimes took place.
There are several useful Websites that deal with understanding prejudice , stereotyping, stereotype and society , ormental health . They can help people understand how hurtful a joke be to a person, possibly even one you love. Imagine being the parent of a child who has heard words that cause him or her to feel devalued and you will begin to understand why even a "harmless joke" can be harmful.
The Best Antidote is the Truth
The best antidote to stereotypes is the truth. Wounds to the body can heal but the harm that words can cause can last forever, damaging someone emotionally for life. That is why it is important to measure your words and learn from the experiences of others and avoid saying things that distance people and find ways to lift up their common humanity.
Finally, my parents were certainly unconscious of what they were doing. They might not have believed it if someone had pointed it out to them--after all, most people see themselves as good and right. With effort, we can change ourselves and in so doing, change society. It is important to see the diversity that surrounds us as a good thing, something wonderful about the world. Isn't that better than living in our own cultural bubbles?
http://www.brighthubeducation.com/middle-school-social-studie...





I am not a greedy Jew.

Top Opinion
-
Feria~THEZombieSlayingB!tch... 2012/08/17 20:52:06I Agree






















They all emphasized the differences between people through exageration and humor about races. Even though there sometimes was a sound moral to the story, it was still ethnic humor.
I guess if I have the choice of looking at all of our differences with fear, or with humor, I'll take the humor. I'm not saying that is the answer, but I really don't know what the answer is.
Perfect- post. Everyone on Sodahead should read this. I love that Naked Black Justice poster- wherever did you find it?
Thank you Bib; it was one of my friends blog I follow and she told me the name of the person who orchestrated it. (James C Lewis)
http://loveblackproject.com/t...
Well, sports fans, we're all friggin' different. Knowing this you'd think each one of us would know better than to treat each other according to the rigid dictates of an erroneous set of cognitive maps, peer pressure, etc.--and yet each of us form a part of that same entity which inflicts its cruelty on people just like us day in and day out.
This is why I've come to the point in my life where, while I eagerly embrace the individual, I detest 'society.' Am I 'anti-social'? You bet your ass!! Something truly nasty happens when we get together in groups. Sociologists call it by a hundred different names--groupthink, risky-shift, etc.--but these are only manifestations. Clinical cryptolinguistics we use in the attempt to understand that ineffable evil which sprouts when any two...
Well, sports fans, we're all friggin' different. Knowing this you'd think each one of us would know better than to treat each other according to the rigid dictates of an erroneous set of cognitive maps, peer pressure, etc.--and yet each of us form a part of that same entity which inflicts its cruelty on people just like us day in and day out.
This is why I've come to the point in my life where, while I eagerly embrace the individual, I detest 'society.' Am I 'anti-social'? You bet your ass!! Something truly nasty happens when we get together in groups. Sociologists call it by a hundred different names--groupthink, risky-shift, etc.--but these are only manifestations. Clinical cryptolinguistics we use in the attempt to understand that ineffable evil which sprouts when any two or more of us act as a mob. By themselves, grasshoppers are relatively benign creatures. Together they form swarms of locusts. So it is with human beings.
Embrace the individual. Detest society. Treat every human being as if you know absolutely nothing about them in advance. Everybody gets the same 'tabla rosa.' Form your opinions of what you learn about people AFTER engaging them in dialogue, not before.
Here endeth this rant. :-)
"blacks are [insert stereotypes here] and Mr. X is black, so i can assume that i already know what Mr. X is like, what he thinks, and what he does ..."
"democrats are [insert stereotypes here] and Mr. Y is a democrat, so i can assume that i already know what Mr. Y is like, what he thinks, and what he does ..."
"mexicans are [insert stereotypes here] and Mr. Z is a mexican, so i can assume that i already know what Mr. Y is like, what he thinks, and what he does ..."
"asians are [insert stereotypes here] and Ms. K is an asian, so i can assume that i already know what Ms. K is like, what she thinks, and what she does ..."
"gays are [insert stereotypes here] and Ms. B is an lesbian, so i can assume that i already know what Ms. B is like, what she thinks, and what she does ..."
by relying on stereotypes, we reduce the "other" to a two-dimensional character and we ignore the real person ... which we would not like if someone treated us in the same way ...
To note: I do treat people with respect, regardless. That's how I am. I just understand that stereotypes play an important role.
You cant just look at these pictures and not have an image ingrained. Stereotypes exist even when we try not to accept them.