NOT ANOTHER CONSPIRACY THEORY
WORD IN YR EAR: THEY'RE ALL PROVEN WRONG EVENTUALLY
Coup d’état in America – evidence mounts
Temlakos~POTL~PWCM~JLA~☆
2013/01/31 01:18:42
|
|
|||||
|
35 votes
|
|
13% | ||
|
73 votes
|
|
28% | ||
|
90 votes
|
|
35% | ||
|
62 votes
|
|
24% | ||
And here is the evidence:
The Newtown Incident: lots of questions there, about how the mainstream media changed its story--and why did the police dispatchers speak of more than one shooter?
Diane Feinstein's massive gun list probably includes some of the weapons you yourself own. (Follow the link and check out her list. Don't assume that it includes only AR-15s and such.)
DHS is buying billions of rounds of ammunition, far more than proficiency training would require.
We now hear loose talk about abolishing the Constitution.
And someone is deliberately fomenting trouble, in the inner cities and maybe having to do with this raft of gun incidents we keep hearing about. We don't normally hear of one gun incident a week! Why now? Coincidence? Ian Fleming said this about coincidence:
And what stands in the way? Two hundred twenty-five sheriffs, and millions of people who, if they're sensible, will NOT turn in their guns.
Read the report. Check out the embeds in it. Then ask yourself:
Is someone, maybe Obama, planning a coup d'état against the Constitution?
And if he is, will he succeed? Fail? Will the sheriffs stop him?
The Newtown Incident: lots of questions there, about how the mainstream media changed its story--and why did the police dispatchers speak of more than one shooter?
Diane Feinstein's massive gun list probably includes some of the weapons you yourself own. (Follow the link and check out her list. Don't assume that it includes only AR-15s and such.)
DHS is buying billions of rounds of ammunition, far more than proficiency training would require.
We now hear loose talk about abolishing the Constitution.
And someone is deliberately fomenting trouble, in the inner cities and maybe having to do with this raft of gun incidents we keep hearing about. We don't normally hear of one gun incident a week! Why now? Coincidence? Ian Fleming said this about coincidence:
Once is happenstance, twice is coincidence, and the third time it’s enemy action.
And what stands in the way? Two hundred twenty-five sheriffs, and millions of people who, if they're sensible, will NOT turn in their guns.
Read the report. Check out the embeds in it. Then ask yourself:
Is someone, maybe Obama, planning a coup d'état against the Constitution?
And if he is, will he succeed? Fail? Will the sheriffs stop him?
Read More: http://www.conservativenewsandviews.com/2013/01/30...
Top Opinion
-
flaca BN-0 2013/01/31 01:45:22Here's what's really going on...
He may attempt a coup, but he won't win. We have his armed forces on our side!
Conspiracy theories don't discredit Obama, they made him look sane in comparison.
The crazier the right gets, the better 2016 looks for us!
As the Grandson of a man who fought against those soldiers in one of the most decorated fleets of the USA Navy and grew up listening to weeks worth of stories about the war, the fighters, the South Pacific theatre and the European theaters and the hundreds upon thousands of people who were rescued, saved, freed and liberated that would have otherwise been executed without exception and the depravity of the soldiers who held them captive in conditions not suitable for even animals....WWII was absolutely about crushing the rise of Hitler and his abhorrent disregard and condescension for human life. If you really are convinced of what you have just said, please do yourself a favor and go visit Dachau, Auschwitz or Treblinka. It takes a sick mind to imagine even a fraction of what occurred to human lives in those locations but to deny such a thing ever occurred is as disturbing and perpetuating as the events themselves.
Grace to you, Glory to God!
The war crimes tribunals were for revenge. Go and read what Robert Taft and even President John Kennedy had to say about them. I'd suggest you to read what one of the judges had to say about the trials but I can't recall his name, so I wont. Brutality leads to brutality and my comments pertain to before the war started. And at that time what I said is true. To appease you yes, at that time the Nazi's where putting "enemies of the state" in internment camps. Hitler did order the liquidation of the mentally insane. And something you will deny but is true, is that Hitler was extending his hands at that time to the Jewish community to stop crimes against them. Yes they were being deported to Palestine or Madagascar, but, they were also being trained in skills that would allow them to...
The war crimes tribunals were for revenge. Go and read what Robert Taft and even President John Kennedy had to say about them. I'd suggest you to read what one of the judges had to say about the trials but I can't recall his name, so I wont. Brutality leads to brutality and my comments pertain to before the war started. And at that time what I said is true. To appease you yes, at that time the Nazi's where putting "enemies of the state" in internment camps. Hitler did order the liquidation of the mentally insane. And something you will deny but is true, is that Hitler was extending his hands at that time to the Jewish community to stop crimes against them. Yes they were being deported to Palestine or Madagascar, but, they were also being trained in skills that would allow them to sustain themselves as their own country. They were being shipped out of the country WITH their fortunes at that time. What is also true is that Winston Churchill, because of the group he answered to, had set his guns on Germany and was supposed to destroy it, because of reasons I don't understand because this was decided before anything bad happened, when at that time heads of states all over the world, including England and the US, were praising Hitler for how he was able to turn Germany around. For example England declared war on Germany because Germany invaded Poland... Yet Russia invaded Poland as well, and other countries too. But no war was declared on Russia. Why not? If it was to defend Poland, why didn't the English declare war against Russia? Because it was decided that Germany must be destroyed. By late 1940 England had no reason what so ever to continue fighting. the whole reason, Poland, was no longer there as Poland when up the spout, or down the tubes, which ever way you want to look at it. I believe the reason they wanted to destroy Germany at a time before any atrocities took place is the reasons I mentioned in my post. That is where my comments end and I'm not talking about anything after 1940.