When Jesus comes down to clean house and rule the earth.
Could world peace and freedom coexist?
Lily
2010/09/01 20:49:42
|
|
|||||
|
11 votes
|
|
32% | |||
|
5 votes
|
|
15% | |||
|
8 votes
|
|
24% | |||
|
10 votes
|
|
29% | |||
After reading Aldous Huxley's Brave New World, I began to wonder, could world peace and freedom coexist? What are your thoughts on the matter?
Top Opinion
-
Dano 2010/09/01 22:30:54Yes! It will happen one day!
Our world History is full of it. In every Utopian grouping where people lived in peace, someone from the outside shows up and destroys it because of difference, religion, political leanings, or conquest.
Peace.
It's sad that humanity has allowed itself to be controlled by a bunch of has-been losers looking for a shot at something better.
The brave new world didn't have peace, they had one better - Harmony, the real thing, a society that just works...unlike ours.
And the cost? Humanity's heart and soul? The value of those things are on par with soiled toilet tissue...unless you are a LOSER, who gives a frack about them.
Can you define 'something better' for pro-Americans with Americanism values who are under attack?
If Atheism rules, there is no basis for human rights, reliable moral truth, significance of man, ultimate accountability etc. Tyranny will always result as man pursues his appetites without concern for moral truth, ultimate accountability or recognizing any ultimate signifigance of human life.
If Islam were to conquer the world, there could be outward 'peace' (absence of war) but under tyranny without freedom or inner peace. Muhammed's Islam does not teach freedom, but forceful submission and tyrannical domination of infidels to Islam. Muhammed's teachings are the source of Islam's violence. Muslims behave violently because of Muhammed's teachings - not depite Muhammed's teachings
If the world accepted the teachings of Christ could peace and freedom be actualized. Of course, some men would still do man's evil 'in the name of' Christ - despite the clear teachings of Christ - but an informed, literate Christian population would not widely follow.
Of course people will point to the Inquisitions, Crusades and Witchburnings because these anomolies are all they are taught of Christian history. These anomolies happened despite the clear teac...
If Atheism rules, there is no basis for human rights, reliable moral truth, significance of man, ultimate accountability etc. Tyranny will always result as man pursues his appetites without concern for moral truth, ultimate accountability or recognizing any ultimate signifigance of human life.
If Islam were to conquer the world, there could be outward 'peace' (absence of war) but under tyranny without freedom or inner peace. Muhammed's Islam does not teach freedom, but forceful submission and tyrannical domination of infidels to Islam. Muhammed's teachings are the source of Islam's violence. Muslims behave violently because of Muhammed's teachings - not depite Muhammed's teachings
If the world accepted the teachings of Christ could peace and freedom be actualized. Of course, some men would still do man's evil 'in the name of' Christ - despite the clear teachings of Christ - but an informed, literate Christian population would not widely follow.
Of course people will point to the Inquisitions, Crusades and Witchburnings because these anomolies are all they are taught of Christian history. These anomolies happened despite the clear teachings of Christ, not because of Christ. Some men will always wrap their evil 'in the name of Christ' but not Christ's actual teachings.
The Bible indicates the world will not know peace until Christ returns. This certainly seems consistent with historic reality.
Lol. Sky wizards aren't a prerequisite for humanism and acknowledgement of human rights.
That is the whole reason Jesus instructed his followers to pray, "Thy Kingdom come..Thy will be done..On earth as it is in heaven." Dan 2:44 proves that this Kingdoms purpose is to destroy all of mans imperfect forms of government.
Anyone trusting in any human leader or political party to usher in peace is a fool.
...Well there may be some analogy there.
Thanks for your intelligent reply and waking me up. I missed that important point.
You talk about supporting the attack on freedom? Where do you stand on the issue of the Islamic community center in Manhattan? I hope you know what freedom means.
I take it you're not familiar with freedom.
Wow! You have too much time on your hands if you are going to be Photoshopping your images.
Everyone is free to worship in America. I am not only in favor of freedom, I encourage free speech because it is easier to tell the good guys from the Commies and other anti-Americans.
Further, I do not have to use Photoshop to show how Mohammedans promote marrying children to grown men. Sharia Law is anti-American and is what the Imam promotes for America.
Look it up yourself.
I don't verify your claims. That's your job if you want someone to believe you.
I am able to back up my claims and that is what I am responsible for.
There was nothing humorous said and I am unable to verify the claim regardless what you hope for.
I have never gone on wild goose chases for someone who makes unsubstantiated claims and I am not about to begin today.
"That's why I'm laughing."
As I said, there is no way to verify your laughing and nothing humorous was said. That is why I suspect you are being untruthful.
http://www.globalsecurity.org...
There is the website, and here is the picture on the homepage of said website.
Any questions?
I studied the image. It does not include the supposed building you offered as some ridiculous 'evidence' of something.
You are not spoon feeding me with anything. I have two eyes and the link proves nothing.
You seriously missed that obvious building on that AMERICAN Naval Base? It's right there. I can't move your eyes for you, they're gonna have to do this themselves.
Edit: Click on the picture for a larger size if you have vision trouble.
Even if that were true, and I am still unable to verify it, it proves nothing whatsoever except that a contractor or architect had some devious plan to do this intentionally.
"You seriously missed that obvious building on that AMERICAN Naval Base? It's right there. I can't move your eyes for you, they're gonna have to do this themselves. "
I was in the US Navy. There is nothing Nazi about my service to the US, nothing at all remotely similar and it was the US who defeated the National Socialists in WWII.
Why you have a fixation on some building that proves nothing at all is beyond my comprehension.
I am only debunking your BS hypothesis that I photoshopped that picture. I did exactly that, and yet you still won't accept the truth. I can tell you're a Republican.