Could the call for legalizing weed be Obama's "October Surprise" ?

In 2004 George W. Bush's re-election campaign worked to put anti-gay marriage ballot initiatives up for vote in several swing states in order to turn out more hard-core conservatives to the polls. This year the question is whether marijuana legalization measures will turn out young voters for Obama.
Bush's plan to use gay marriage bans -- in states that did not actually allow gay marriage -- as a turnout booster led to signs featuring icky public restroom symbols proliferated and liberal panic that the Christian right had taken over. The press obsessed over "values voters." One of Bush's aides, Ken Mehlman, who later came out as gay himself, has apologized for the strategy, two others say it didn't work.
This year there's another incumbent president with modest approval ratings who could turn out his base with controversial ballot measures. But this time, the issue features no biblical or scatological imagery. In 2012, voters in swing states will decide whether they'll allow their fellow citizens to bear joints. Unlike the gay marriage votes, there's no indication that Obama's re-election team is behind any of the pot legalization initiatives, but there are Democrats who are hoping that it will boost turnout among weed's biggest fans: young people.
Getting more young people to vote has long been a Democratic fantasy, since they tend to vote so heavily Democratic. But past attempts to bong the vote have been disappointing, in part because stoners aren't the group anyone would most count on to bother filling out a ballot. Ahead of the 2010 midterms, The Wall Street Journal ran the story, "Democrats Look to Cultivate Pot Vote in 2012," noting that California's pot-legalizing Proposition 19 was being studied to see if similar measures "could energize young, liberal voters in swing states for the 2012 presidential election." But exit polls that year showed no spike in young voter turnout, and marijuana legalization was the top issue for just 1 in 10 voters, the Los Angeles Times reported. (Also: Californians ended up voting down Prop. 19.) Still, there were hopeful signs: 64 percent of voters 18-to-24 supported it, and 52 percent of voters 25-to-29 did. In March, the pro-legalization site Just Say Now suggested that the presidential election will draw more young people to the polls, and they'll vote for pot legalization while they're there.
That being said, several have argued that this could be the year for pro-marijuana turnout. After all, 2011 was the first year more young people smoked pot than cigarettes, the CDC says. There is a marijuana initiative on the ballot in Washington, and there might be one in Nebraska and Massachusetts, but those states are pretty solid for one party or the other. Here's our guide to whether pot politics could make an impact in the swing states considering new marijuana rules:
State: Colorado
Initiative: Amendment 64 would make it legal for adults to possess up to an ounce of marijuana or six plants for cultivating. The state has allowed medical marijuana since 2000. Pro-legalization groups have raised $2 million to campaign for the amendment, the Denver Post reports.
Chances of passage: In December, the left-leaning Public Policy Polling found that 49 percent of voterssupported the amendment. But this month, the right-leaning Rasmussen found that 61 percent of likely Colorado voters support it.
Chances it'll affect Obama's standing in the state: The president is averaging a very slim lead in the state, less than 2 percentage points over Mitt Romney. The Associated Press points out that though a marijuana measure failed in 2006, that year Coloradans elected a Democratic governor after eight years of Republican rule.
State: Ohio
Initiative: Supporters are collecting the 400,000 signatures required to get two amendments on the ballot: the Medical Cannabis Amendment and the Alternative Treatment Amendment. The first would allow medical marijuana, the second would set up a commission to regulate it. They were approved by the state attorney general several months ago, and the signature deadline is July 4.
Chances of passage: The initiatives aren't on the ballot yet. But in 2009 and 2010, separate polls found that 73 percent of Ohioans supported allowing medical marijuana.
Read more: http://www.theatlanticwire.com/politics/2012/06/legalizing-we...
From : The Atlantic Wire
By: ELSPETH REEVE
Top Opinion
-
Red Branch 2012/06/14 04:54:38Obama will do anything to energize his voter base!+9In this case he will need to find a way to energize those he is appealing to, just so they vote.
Amnesty is a bigger fear of mine. 30 million new citizens and we are done for.





















The koolaid must be sour by now eh?
The White House softball team played the pro-marijuana lobbyists' team and lost 25-3. Still no word yet on which side President Obama played for.
Let's remove the income of most of the cons they make off pot and legalize it!!.
And really a SMART PRESIDENT would take this and turn it into jobs and taxes for his country.
So that would probably get him a lot of votes. Add to that the Gay Marriage support, and more freedom for the LGBT community, gets him the perverted vote.
Then the support of Welfare, and forgiveness of debt for all, and you give him more votes from the freeloaders of our society. Add in the illegals he wants toi give amnesty, and I fear you have another 4 years of Obama.
Buying Their Votes with the Prospect of Promising to legalize Pot would insure that...even though HE cannot legalize it...it takes a Vote of Congress to do that..
After reconsidering though, I think this numby may think that would be a really cool, impressive move and he'd think like, "The whole country would know I'm Hip ..... I'm the Hip Pres .... let's git down wit Obi."
He's THAT much of a gumball.
Smoke Shops all over the place that sell this stuff and the pipes, bong's, etc., to go with it...
Many conservatives disagree with me, but I think legalizing marijuana is a good idea. High school kids are already using more pot than alcohol because it's easier to obtain. Nothing would hurt the drug dealers more than the Walmart supply chain. Replacing massive law-enforcement cost with tax revenue is one of the few things Obama can do to reduce the deficit. I'm not sure if legalizing pot will create jobs, but the only jobs we might lose are government jobs -- and they weren't producing economic value anyway.
I'm not interested in using the product myself, but attempts to restrict marijuana have not fared any better than Prohibition. It costs a lot of money to ban marijuana, and we can't afford it. Cigarettes are addictive but somehow legal. Of course, a cigarette ban would be futile. The government is addicted to the tax revenue as much as smokers are to nicotine. Marijuana is not physically addictive, and yet it's banned anyway.
Socialists like to spend "other people's money". This is a potentially a huge pile of money, ...
Many conservatives disagree with me, but I think legalizing marijuana is a good idea. High school kids are already using more pot than alcohol because it's easier to obtain. Nothing would hurt the drug dealers more than the Walmart supply chain. Replacing massive law-enforcement cost with tax revenue is one of the few things Obama can do to reduce the deficit. I'm not sure if legalizing pot will create jobs, but the only jobs we might lose are government jobs -- and they weren't producing economic value anyway.
I'm not interested in using the product myself, but attempts to restrict marijuana have not fared any better than Prohibition. It costs a lot of money to ban marijuana, and we can't afford it. Cigarettes are addictive but somehow legal. Of course, a cigarette ban would be futile. The government is addicted to the tax revenue as much as smokers are to nicotine. Marijuana is not physically addictive, and yet it's banned anyway.
Socialists like to spend "other people's money". This is a potentially a huge pile of money, and for once it's not at my expense. If there is one new tax that most people will agree on, this is the one.
Despite all of this, I think Obama is bluffing. Legalizing marijuana is a nifty campaign promise. But nothing changes the fact he is the INCUMBENT and could move forward with this during his current term if he was truly serious about it. He's not, which is why there will be no mention of it until it becomes a talking point for the campaign. Like so many other campaign promises, when Obama fails to deliver he will find someone to blame.
As with any "new" idea that Obama might promote during the campaign, the question is, "Why do you need a SECOND term to do this when you passed up the opportunity to get it done in your FIRST term?"
“The war on drugs has been an utter failure. (W)e need to rethink and decriminalize our (nation’s) marijuana laws.”-Barack Obama, January 2004
This is a political speculation article.If it's wrong,nobody remembers it.But if they're correct,the website & writer comes off as political geniuses!