Cops Already Know the Sore with The Zimmerman Martin Case.

Now, to cut through the bullsh!t.

There hasn't been a single person come forward that has indicated that Zimmerman was a racist of any kind.... quite the opposite in fact.

There's a very good reason Zimmerman didn't partake in the typical 'Hispanic -Latino' cultural events that are common among Mexicans or Cubans in America because his ancestry is from South America.... aka Peru. Why would he give two sh!ts about Cinco de Mayo, the Spanish Conquistadors or Fidel Castro.... he's half PERUVIAN.

He purchased his Kel Tec 9mm in the Fall of 2009 after the third incident of a neighbors pit bull escaping their yard and was harassing family members. He first bought some pepper spray but on the advice of a Seminole County Animal Control officer, bought the gun. He didn't purchase it with any kind of neighborhood watch program in mind.

Zimmerman was driving towards the front gate of the complex to run an errand when he first noticed Martin walking between the condos on the east side of Twin Lakes Retreat.
He was not on 'duty' or 'patrolling' or out 'looking for someone to shoot'.

Another fallacy is that Zimmerman was told not to follow, not to get out of his car or go back to his car. None of those scenarios are true. What did happen, was the dispatcher noticing the change in the background sounds AFTER Zimmerman had parked his SUV and exited. The dispatcher never mentions a vehicle, only asks, "Are you following him?", to which Zimmerman replies, "Yeah". The dispatcher then says, "OK, we don't need you to do that" and Zimmerman replies "OK". That's it folks,.... no order of any kind is ever given. The dispatcher never says to stop following, stay in your vehicle or return.
What he DOES say, is a standard response which is given for the caller's safety and to cover the PD from any liability because dispatchers and 911 operators are not allowed to give commands. They are there to ask questions and relay info to the proper agencies.

Regardless of why he chose to exit his vehicle and follow to see were Martin had ran to or not, the fact remains that he wasn't stalking, chasing or hunting anyone. He was merely trying to get a visual location on Martin which he mentions on the audio he has lost. While giving his address over the phone he makes the comment that he doesn't want to say it all out loud because he doesn't know where this kid's at.

Besides, where is it written that it's against the law to drive around tyour own complex or walk around three times if you chose to? Where is making a call on a cell phone to police, against the law? What law did Zimmerman break? NONE !!

There's a few things that don't add up about this.... mainly..... over 4 minutes go by from the time that Martin takes off running and the first 911 call is logged in with audible screaming heard in the background.
Where was Martin for that 4 minutes and 31 seconds?
Brandy's condo was only about 100 yards from where Zimmerman lost sight of him.
What could have possibly been the reason that he wasn't at the condo about 20 seconds after taking off running?
High school junior, 6'-3 " that seemed to be in fairly good shape and had played football most of his previous days.... can't run 100 yards fearing for his life in less that 4 minutes?
That's almost enough time to run the entire perimeter of the complex.

Why was he anywhere near 2831 Retreat View Circle?

This is why there is no point in arguing with a partisan moron, such as yourself. You will never admit that you ever get anything wrong, bacause you're afraid the slipshod edifice that is your advocacy will come crashing down if you do.

Firstly, safety advice from a 911 dispatcher is never "merely" anything. It was clearly a suggestion not to continue following. Or do really think a 911 dispatcher is some kind of lawyer for the SPD, and has your interpretation (not one I would depend on) of the liabilities involved for the SPD? And did I not already say there was no "command?" Or must I interpret the "non-command" not to follow in the same way you did?

And who is this "they" that did all these things that you describe? The initial pictures of Martin were provided by the parents; others surfaced in this global entity you stupidly call "the lame stream media" a few days later. The initial photo of Zimmerman, I believe, was from a police mug shot, from an arrest for assaulting an officer. Other pictures emerged later in the same media you condemn. And "lightening up" the photo to look white? Where did you get that? THAT looked "white" to you? He looked a lot "whiter" in ALL the later pics of him that I saw. "They" didn't alter the tapes. Only one network presented a misleadingly edited tape on the air, and the same network fired the "editor." The only other "editing" was done in an attempt to figure out what he was muttering under his breath, and it wasn't actually "editing," in the sense of removing or inserting material. It was voice enhancement. And they did both the enhancement Martin's supporters like, as well as the one you like. Well, maybe they really are the "lame stream media," unable to even prevent the facts from getting in the way of their allegedly "librul" agenda. I wish you could be that "lamestream" yourself. Just imagine, you learned all your "facts" from the "librul lamestream media." In the real world, the elements of any story often emerge slowly. Sorry that confused you.

Thanks for AGAIN proving that this Martin-Zimmerman case is a political Rorshach test, where everyone, black, white, liberal, conservative, etc. see exactly what they want, or expect, to see. I still see a shapeless inkblot.