Quantcast

Conservatives: Why do you want to force gay people back into the closet?

Ian Mossner 2012/06/14 14:26:24
+1
You!
Add Photos & Videos

Top Opinion

  • Reichstolz 2012/06/14 14:53:53
    Reichstolz
    +3
    I don't want to force anyone to do anything. I also don't want to be forced to accept their sexual choices as something equivalent to mine. The gay agenda doesn't seek equality they seek acceptance for deviance. There is no need to change definitions of accepted terms for a deviant 2% of the population.
    >> See Replies

Sort By
  • Most Raves
  • Least Raves
  • Oldest
  • Newest
Opinions

  • Simi Dave 2012/06/28 18:49:54
    Simi Dave
    We don’t want to force gays back into the closet. Just be normal.
    reply
  • MorbidCynic 2012/06/23 11:56:07 (edited)
    MorbidCynic
    +1
    A lot of us actually have more important things to worry about, sorry to disappoint you.
    reply
  • Bibliophilic 2012/06/22 21:45:54 (edited)
    Bibliophilic
    +1
    They fail to recognize the humanity of people who happen to be gay. Being gay isn't a lifestyle choice- it's one's sexual orientation. It should not be an issue in 2012. Fortunately, change is around the corner. There are already a few conservatives that believe that gays are equal to straights and deserve the benefits of legal marriage.
    reply
  • American☆Atheist 2012/06/16 19:47:11
    American☆Atheist
    +1
    Conservatives want company.
    reply
  • Superman 2012/06/14 15:31:34
    Superman
    +2
    I'm a conservative and I don't want gays back in the closet. I support gay marriage. I'm mildly annoyed by the assumption that all conservatives are like that actually.
    reply
  • Sparky 2012/06/14 15:15:51 (edited)
  • Ian Mos... Sparky 2012/06/14 19:47:06
    Ian Mossner
    +2
    Being gay is ok.
    reply
  • Sparky Ian Mos... 2012/06/14 20:19:57
  • Ian Mos... Sparky 2012/06/14 20:53:42
    Ian Mossner
    +2
    It is ok.

    There is no other "opinion" to have.
    reply
  • Sparky Ian Mos... 2012/06/14 21:11:14
  • Ian Mos... Sparky 2012/06/15 11:37:31
    Ian Mossner
    +2
    Just like marriage.
    reply
  • Sparky Ian Mos... 2012/06/15 11:53:13
  • Ian Mos... Sparky 2012/06/15 17:52:54
    Ian Mossner
    I don't want you to be on the wrong side of history.
    reply
  • Sparky Ian Mos... 2012/06/15 17:59:04
  • Ian Mos... Sparky 2012/06/15 20:53:08
    Ian Mossner
    +1
    History books will not be kind to you.
    reply
  • Sparky Ian Mos... 2012/06/15 22:49:33
  • Ian Mos... Sparky 2012/06/15 23:38:44
    Ian Mossner
    +2
    Equality!
    reply
  • Sparky Ian Mos... 2012/06/18 14:58:26
  • Bibliop... Sparky 2012/06/22 21:47:30 (edited)
    Bibliophilic
    Gays are not related- your point is moot. Also, polygamy is none of my business or yours as long as all parties are consenting adults.
    reply
  • Sparky Bibliop... 2012/06/25 12:44:46
  • Waldorf 2012/06/14 14:54:00
    Waldorf
    +2
    I believe many would say it's where they belong, not parading down the street half naked holding hands and demanding attention.
    reply
  • Reichstolz 2012/06/14 14:53:53
    Reichstolz
    +3
    I don't want to force anyone to do anything. I also don't want to be forced to accept their sexual choices as something equivalent to mine. The gay agenda doesn't seek equality they seek acceptance for deviance. There is no need to change definitions of accepted terms for a deviant 2% of the population.
    reply
  • Ian Mos... Reichstolz 2012/06/14 19:47:28
    Ian Mossner
    +2
    Yes there is.
    reply
  • Reichstolz Ian Mos... 2012/06/15 02:08:55
    Reichstolz
    +1
    No, every time when put to a vote of the people it is confirmed there is no need to bastardize accepted definitions to accept deviance.
    reply
  • Ian Mos... Reichstolz 2012/06/15 11:37:50
    Ian Mossner
    +3
    One day, gay equality will win.
    reply
  • Reichstolz Ian Mos... 2012/06/15 13:16:38
    Reichstolz
    +2
    If you seek equality, then there would be no distinction between individuals and government would be removed from sanctioning any relationship. But again, the gay agenda doesn't seek equality it seeks acceptance for deviance.
    reply
  • Ian Mos... Reichstolz 2012/06/15 17:53:21
    Ian Mossner
    +3
    We want equality. Period.
    reply
  • Reichstolz Ian Mos... 2012/06/15 23:26:08
    Reichstolz
    +1
    Then you should be lobbying for government to sanction no relationship. When you want acceptance for your deviance, you are not seeking equality.
    reply
  • Blunder... Reichstolz 2012/06/16 23:51:25
    BlunderWoman ~ FTGOP~ BN 0
    +2
    LOL! I guess that women and black men who couldn't vote should have just lobbied to remove everyone's right to vote then, instead of trying to change laws to include them? What a ridiculous argument.
    reply
  • Reichstolz Blunder... 2012/06/16 23:55:04
    Reichstolz
    +1
    You are comparing apples and oranges, which I don't expect you to understand there is no similarity among sexual preference, race, or gender. A woman can choose to not exhibit her gender, a black person cannot, a homosexual needs not be recognized for their deviant choice.
    reply
  • Blunder... Reichstolz 2012/06/17 07:01:08
    BlunderWoman ~ FTGOP~ BN 0
    +2
    It's not apples to oranges, because sexuality isn't a choice.
    reply
  • Reichstolz Blunder... 2012/06/17 13:20:59
    Reichstolz
    +1
    Mammals are sexual opportunists, sexuality without environment, for them is any port in a storm. Exhibited behavior is a choice.
    reply
  • Blunder... Reichstolz 2012/06/17 13:53:14
    BlunderWoman ~ FTGOP~ BN 0
    +2
    Okay, then. If that's true, then today you could "choose" to be attracted to men only. It goes without saying that you don't have to engage in any sexual behaviors, just be an opportunist and look at men and be attracted to them. Let me know how it works out for you.
    reply
  • Reichstolz Blunder... 2012/06/17 16:49:34
    Reichstolz
    +1
    You are correct, I could choose to be deviant from the norm of society in many behavioral actions, I could choose to , rob, murder, rape, molest, etc. All choices mammals make regarding behavior. While I understand you find it easier to believe that we have no choice in our actions, a murderer just murders, a rapist just rapes, etc. it does not make it true.
    reply
  • Blunder... Reichstolz 2012/06/17 18:51:28 (edited)
    BlunderWoman ~ FTGOP~ BN 0
    +2
    Don't put words in my mouth. I certainly do not condone those actions because both rape and murder cause serious harm and death.

    Same-sex attraction between two consenting adults causes no more harm than opposite-sex attraction between consenting adults. Your comparisons are way off base.

    I doubt that you could be attracted to men but you just "choose" not to...then again, if it is true, you might just be a bisexual, in which case you do have a choice between being attracted to men or women.
    reply
  • Reichstolz Blunder... 2012/06/18 13:54:38
    Reichstolz
    +1
    Every action in life is a choice, especially when it comes to exhibited behavior. You are correct homosexual choice causes no harm, it is just deviant and should never be considered equal to heterosexual choice. There is no equivalence between the two, regardless how hard the gay agenda tries to make some sort of similarity.
    reply
  • Blunder... Reichstolz 2012/06/19 17:22:44
    BlunderWoman ~ FTGOP~ BN 0
    +2
    Do you know any gay people? If so, other than gender, exactly how are their relationships so different from yours?
    reply
  • Reichstolz Blunder... 2012/06/19 21:49:29
    Reichstolz
    +1
    Yes, as a matter of fact, my nephew is gay. And also agrees with me there is no equality among any relationships. There is uniqueness to every human interaction none should ever be classified as equal.
    reply
  • Blunder... Reichstolz 2012/06/19 22:45:05
    BlunderWoman ~ FTGOP~ BN 0
    +2
    "There is uniqueness to every human interaction none should ever be classified as equal". You might as well say that about people, yet in this country, we are all considered to be equal, and we all have the same rights.

    Marriage is a right, and therefore no one (we're discussing consenting adults here, not animals or kids) should be excluded. No one can force you to accept what you find to be deviant, but neither should you have any say over whom a person marries, especially when their relationships do not cause harm.
    reply
  • Reichstolz Blunder... 2012/06/19 23:50:43
    Reichstolz
    +1
    No we are not all equal, we are afforded equal protection of our rights granted by God, not government. Marriage is not a right. It is a social construct which government uses to influence society. I am speaking statistically when I use the term deviant, their sexual preference lies outside societal norms. And those societal norms, every time they are put to the vote of society, are upheld.
    reply
1 2 3 Next » Last »

News & Politics

2013/05/19 03:52:22

Hot Questions on SodaHead
More Hot Questions

More Community More Originals