THE TIME IS NOW!
Who could be worse than an illegal alien occupying our White House?
What could be worse than someone who steps on our constitution?
Where can we turn when America is being held hostage by an illegal alien?
When will our country be vindicated in this fraudulent matter?
Why should Americans continue to give this Usurper more time to destroy our country.
Congressmen Walter Jones Starts Impeachment Process on Barack Obama. Will You Personally Contact Your Representative and Urge Them to Join In?
safari
2012/03/10 01:24:49
|
|
|||||
|
129 votes
|
|
60% | ||
|
64 votes
|
|
30% | ||
|
21 votes
|
|
10% | ||
Watch the Video for an explanation.
LINK TO BILL RESOLUTION
Which begins with:
"HCON 107 IH
112th CONGRESS
2d Session
H. CON. RES. 107
People are constantly complaining about nothing being done. It is up to US! So lets get busy!
LINK TO BILL RESOLUTION
Which begins with:
"HCON 107 IH
112th CONGRESS
2d Session
H. CON. RES. 107
Expressing the sense of Congress that the use of offensive
military force by a President without prior and clear authorization of
an Act of Congress constitutes an impeachable high crime and misdemeanor
under article II, section 4 of the Constitution.
March 7, 2012
Mr. JONES submitted the following concurrent resolution; which was referred to the Committee on the Judiciary"
People are constantly complaining about nothing being done. It is up to US! So lets get busy!
Read More: http://www.youtube.com/watch?feature=player_embedd...
Top Opinion
-
RG 2012/03/10 02:26:53
i plan to make a list of the traitor republicans who back obama in any way
the TRAITOR and Anti Semite snow has retired good riddance to the democrat
first off where was this idiot when took us into 2 wars both not declared. sorry but the president
is the commnander in cheif. now i understand that some people will say that he misued the constitution but truth be told he much leeway anny other president has had. yes should he consult congress, in most cases i agree but there are times especially now that the other party will vote no only becuase they smell a political victory instead of what is good for the country.
this has become sport in this country will admins, this does not mean that it is right simply
conveniant. this will fail because his own party will not and cannot go along.
so again the other political party has done waht they always do, culture war over jobs.
Sad, huh?
about contraception and not having a single female on the panel.
any more you can think of
the constitution does say the president is commander in chief. that in itself gives the president
a wide range of latitude. the real problem here is somewhat difference. the problem in libya
had to be done quickly very quckly. point two the republicans in the house were completely
unconcerned about libya, they only wanted to embarass the president, most especially in the face of nato.
back to the war powers act, the only reason that past presidents have not challenged the law
is to keep some sort of relationship with congress. the war powers act itself was a product
of over reaching in the aftermath of the vietnam war. to this end virtually every president has ignored it. this one is no different.
on all the places on the planet. we have to pick and choose carefully.
to your second point the law has never been challenged in court. the founders
in the framing of constitution left the president with the title of commander in chief.
they did this for a reason, they clearly understood in a hostile situation the country would have to move fast with one voice, there for in my opinion they wrote
it vague but still gave the president powers of commander in chief.
the war powers act in itself seems to restrict the preisdent from being commander in chief. to your last point no, in my opinion again presidents since the 1970's
have never challenged the law in court because they simply ignore it, and the congress will complain like they always do and do nothing.
why ?, because they fully understand that it would probably not with stand a court
challenge. and it a...
on all the places on the planet. we have to pick and choose carefully.
to your second point the law has never been challenged in court. the founders
in the framing of constitution left the president with the title of commander in chief.
they did this for a reason, they clearly understood in a hostile situation the country would have to move fast with one voice, there for in my opinion they wrote
it vague but still gave the president powers of commander in chief.
the war powers act in itself seems to restrict the preisdent from being commander in chief. to your last point no, in my opinion again presidents since the 1970's
have never challenged the law in court because they simply ignore it, and the congress will complain like they always do and do nothing.
why ?, because they fully understand that it would probably not with stand a court
challenge. and it also keeps the execuive and legislative branches from going to
war among themselves. there are deep and contentious issues issues among both branches of government. our system like all others is far from perfect, even though some people seem to think differently.
at times we pick our spots and pass on others. after our failure in rawanda
back in the early 90's i think that a lot of people in the west thought that the
west could have done more to prevent a human disaster. i always thought that way, we need to pick our spots.
we need to pick our spots, and there are exceptions to every rule.
we cannot just simply put our heads into the sand and let other people
be killed of by the thousands. we need to pick and choose our battles.
isolationism will not do us any good, we tried that and it failed.
back in the mid 1990's we intervened in bosnia and forced the sebs to back off. we did the same thing in kosovo. if we had not intervened. there would have been a good chance that europe would have fallen into war. most people do not know how close we came to that ugly conclusion. that is as close as i would like to see in any lifetime.
most people do not understand the animosities that lay below the surface in europe.
perish. remember being the only super power left on this world does give us certain responsibilties.
i to feel like you do to a certain extent. but there are times when
military force is needed. i agree we use much to often and do not pick our spots wisely. humanitarian aid would do so much better
in most areas, however then we could not do what we do best.
sell arms to everyone to start wars that can continue to fuel.
one has to admit, it is clever.