Quantcast

Co-Founder of Paypal donates $2.5 million to Ron Paul SuperPAC. Still think Ron Paul is off base?

Tully 2012/05/21 17:11:41
No, He's the only one who can lead America to financial security.
Yes, ABO is the only vote I'll cast, even if Romney will send jobs overseas on day 1.
Undecided
None of the above
You!
Add Photos & Videos
With Eye On Future, Billionaire Investor Bets On Paul


by

May 19, 2012

In the race for the Republican presidential
nomination, only one candidate remains to challenge presumptive nominee
Mitt Romney: Texas Rep. Ron Paul.

Even Paul has said
he will no longer campaign in states that have yet to hold their
primaries. And Paul has always been considered a long shot to win. But
that hasn't deterred many of his hard-core supporters, including the
Silicon Valley billionaire who has bankrolled the superPAC backing Paul.

Peter
Thiel is a venture capitalist, entrepreneur and co-founder of PayPal.
He hit the jackpot again when he gave Mark Zuckerberg the money to
launch Facebook.

Thiel's half-million dollar
Facebook investment is now worth more than $1 billion. His success and
his smarts have made him a virtual rock star in Silicon Valley.



More than two dozen people or groups have donated at least $1 million each to the new superPACs.











A Contrarian View

On
a recent day at Stanford University, the lecture hall is full long
before Thiel saunters in — light blue business suit, open collar, a Diet
Coke in his hand, his eyes shifting nervously as he scans the crowd of
mostly adoring undergraduates. He's come to argue a contrarian view:
that technological progress is decelerating.

"Whether
we look at transportation, energy, commodity production, food
production, agro-tech, nanotechnology — that with the exception of
computers, we've had tremendous slowdown," he says.

Thiel
acknowledges that computers are getting faster, cheaper and better. But
he says that's the virtual world of bits and bytes. In the real world
of stuff, Thiel insists, there's been a slowdown.

"I
believe we are in a world where innovation in stuff was outlawed. It
was basically outlawed in the last 40 years — part of it was
environmentalism, part of it was risk aversion," he says. "And all the
engineering disciplines that had to do with stuff have basically been
outlawed one by one."

In other words, he says government regulation stifles innovation and, without innovation, there is no economic growth.

Encouraging Entrepreneurs

In technology circles, Thiel's libertarian views are well known.

As a law student in the 1980s, Thiel co-founded the conservative Stanford Review, and he co-wrote a book critical of political correctness and multiculturalism on that campus.

In
more recent years, he's argued that higher education is failing America
and that some of the brightest students are probably better off not
going to college at all.

That's why he
created the 20 Under 20 Thiel Fellowships — a program that gives
promising young entrepreneurs $100,000 to skip college for two years and
create their own business, as he explained on All Things Considered last year.

"I
think anything that requires real global breakthroughs requires a
degree of intensity and sustained effort that cannot be done part time,
so it's something you have to do around the clock, and that doesn't
compute with our existing educational system," Thiel said. "Had the
people who started Facebook decided to stay at Harvard, they would not
have been able to build the company, and by the time they graduated in
2006, that window probably would have come and gone."

Betting On The Future

As
a conservative, Thiel has donated money to a variety of Republican
lawmakers. He's also Christian and gay, and he's a major donor to
GOProud, a gay conservative group based in Washington, D.C.

Thiel's
contribution of more than $2.5 million to the Endorse Liberty superPAC,
which supports Paul, makes him the fund's largest donor — in spite of
the fact that the two men have never met or communicated in any way.

Thiel
declined to comment for this report. But his spokesman, Jim O'Neill,
says Thiel believes Paul is the best candidate to beat President Obama.

"There's
a great opportunity to reach out to people who are concerned about
civil liberties on the left, people who are concerned about deficits in
the middle, people who are concerned about taxation on the right, people
who are opposed to bailouts and bubbles," O'Neill says. "And so I think
Paul would do really well against Obama."

If
that sounds like a long shot, keep this in mind: That's exactly what
Thiel invests in. He's given money to a variety of long-term projects,
from anti-aging research to "seasteading" — an effort to build
communities on platforms in international waters. And he has said his
support for Paul is the best bet for now to encourage a libertarian
movement.


Add a comment above

Sort By
  • Most Raves
  • Least Raves
  • Oldest
  • Newest
Opinions

  • DoxieDad 2012/05/22 02:45:24
    None of the above
    DoxieDad
    Ron Paul is not off base he is just unelectable.
  • S and S 2012/05/22 02:27:53
    No, He's the only one who can lead America to financial security.
    S and S
    I agree with what's in this report. The government stalls innovation and growth!!!
  • Met 2012/05/22 01:30:38
    None of the above
    Met
    +1
    You do realize the guy you're talking about, the one that donated 75% of Ron Paul's campaign funds, is a Bilderberger right?

    You know, that group of international meddlers the Tea Party, and Ron Paul supporters love to hate...

    I'm sure there's nothing going on behind the scenes here...(sarcasm)
  • Alien R... Met 2012/05/22 01:56:38
    Alien Ramone
    The candidates who support the NDAA, Patriot Act, the TSA, assassination of citizens by the government, and the wars/occupations seem to be advancing the Bilderberg agenda.

    From what I've read about Thiel, he has advanced Libertarian causes, and I understand Ron Paul having connections with him, but never supporting the globalist agenda of the Bilderberg group.

    I could also picture the Bilderberg group having members trying to infiltrate into all organizations.
  • Jackie G - Poker Playing Pa... 2012/05/21 23:45:09
    None of the above
    Jackie G - Poker Playing Patriot
    This man may give his money to whomever he chooses - it is his right
  • Hula girl - Friends not Fol... 2012/05/21 23:32:43
    None of the above
    Hula girl - Friends not Followers
    Oh, so they are giving the money to Obama via Paul. Good job.....NOT!
  • Tully Hula gi... 2012/05/22 04:42:57
    Tully
    He gave money to Paul because he supports freedom!
  • Hula gi... Tully 2012/05/22 05:38:17
    Hula girl - Friends not Followers
    Yet those that vote for Paul will be giving votes to Obama just like Ross Perot. That's not supporting freedom. He can't win.
  • Tully Hula gi... 2012/05/22 12:32:28
    Tully
    "That's not supporting freedom."

    So supporting the candidate that you believe in and voting for the candidate you believe in is not freedom? You need to redefine freedom. ABO isn't going to change much and ABO isn't going to win.
  • Hula gi... Tully 2012/05/22 19:16:00
    Hula girl - Friends not Followers
    Sure but when that candidate is dropping out, not a chance of winning you are not supporting Obama and that's not supporting freedom but the thug in charge.
  • Tully Hula gi... 2012/05/22 19:23:39
    Tully
    +1
    Ron Paul's not dropping out. If you read past the MSM headlines, you'll see, he's not spending money in primary states and focusing on state conventions. I don't know if you noticed, but Paul's received a majority of delegates in the last four state conventions.
  • safari 2012/05/21 22:03:44
    None of the above
    safari
    I never thought Ron was that off base to start with. I don't agree with him about everything he has stated he stands for - but that is just normal. There will never be a politician that is perfect.

    Is he the only person I would vote for? No
  • Katfish 2012/05/21 21:52:08
    No, He's the only one who can lead America to financial security.
    Katfish
    +1
    I would not say he is the only one, but is the only member of one of the two major parties currently running for POTUS that could.
    Gary Johnson or Virgil Goode would also suffice.
  • mrdog 2012/05/21 18:30:27
    None of the above
    mrdog
    Paypal bubba is nuts...bark
  • NPC 2012/05/21 17:18:22
    None of the above
    NPC
    +1
    Ron Paul has no chance of ever being elected POTUS.
  • Tully NPC 2012/05/21 19:01:06
    Tully
    +4
    He's got a better chance than Romney, if nominated. Ron Paul's message resonates more with the general public.
  • Reichstolz 2012/05/21 17:16:36
    None of the above
    Reichstolz
    +1
    Raising money does not make him a worthy candidate. If that were the case Obama would be the only option.

See Votes by State

The map above displays the winning answer by region.

News & Politics

2013/05/25 20:53:18

Hot Questions on SodaHead
More Hot Questions

More Community More Originals