Cities crackdown on homeless with new bans on eating and camping in public. What is your opinion?
carl
2012/06/11 14:30:02
|
|
|||||
|
6 votes
|
|
13% | ||
|
28 votes
|
|
61% | ||
|
12 votes
|
|
26% | ||
Read More: http://www.usatoday.com/news/nation/story/2012-06-...
Top Opinion
-
None of the above
+7It is Ok to ban these things as long as they have other reasonable options for the homeless. There is no reason that there should be homeless people in America.
More polls by carl
Sort By
- bob h. Karen E 2012/06/11 16:23:01
did that 12% include the Cayman and Swiss accounts?reply - Sport_G... bob h. 2012/06/11 15:59:50+2Romney paid nearly 3 1/2 million in taxes.................but in your mind thats not paying taxes?.....go figure.reply
- bob h. Sport_G... 2012/06/11 16:25:17Out of $225,000,000; Plus Swiss and Cayman accounts? You're right, in my mind that's NOT paying taxes. Where's the other returns?reply
- Dagon bob h. 2012/06/11 16:45:49
- bob h. Dagon 2012/06/12 02:49:45Especially when you throw it into a flake church who sends it out of the country. What can possibly go wrong.reply
- Dagon bob h. 2012/06/12 03:55:57
- Sport_G... bob h. 2012/06/11 20:21:40+1Your mind is warped. He played by the legal tax laws and paid what was required under tax law........how much extra did you send in this past April?reply
- U-Dog bob h. 2012/06/11 16:23:52+2If you had any class you would fact check instead of just trying to deflect and parrot the party-line BS. Many, if not most, of the cities enacting these bans are run by your beloved Compassionate Do Gooding Democrats.reply
- bob h. U-Dog 2012/07/18 22:43:29Where do you get that?reply
- JanHopkins 2012/06/11 15:04:47None of the above+3I think the real problem is that there is no safety net in place for poor single adults with no children. A plan needs to be formulated to assist these people because with higher and higher unemployment the cities are going to be unindated with homeless people. Just feeding them is not enough. They need real shelter. They need some kind of jobs. How about some kind of co-op providing food and shelter in exchange for jobs that keep the city clean. That would at least give them a starting point to begin rebuilding their lives as well as assist in rebuilding the city.reply
-
+1Good ideas.reply
- Reichstolz 2012/06/11 14:55:02I support the new bans.Time to quit coddling the filth residing on the streets.reply
- bob h. Reichstolz 2012/06/11 16:27:10What are you, some kind of a Christian? Let them die in the streets; they're an annoyance.reply
- Reichstolz bob h. 2012/06/11 16:53:46The vast majority need to be institutionalized, but no one is looking for a proper solution, so why waste resources when not trying to solve a problem.reply
- bob h. Reichstolz 2012/06/12 02:51:52Unemployment calls for arrest? What system are you recommending?reply
- Reichstolz bob h. 2012/06/12 06:48:40Arrest for unemployment, interesting idea, but that is not what I am referring to. I am refering to the majority of homeless who are there under their own will. We have built housing developments and they do not stay in them, we have a continual problem with the cronic homeless who are homeless by choice. Usually it is a function of psychosis, which the only remedy is institutionalization. Unfortunately Reagan did away with a necessary entity.reply
- ray 2012/06/11 14:45:35None of the above+2What alternatives are the cities providing ?reply
-
None of the above+7It is Ok to ban these things as long as they have other reasonable options for the homeless. There is no reason that there should be homeless people in America.reply
«« First « Prev
1
2
