Quantcast

Christie Blocks Tax Credit for ‘Jersey Shore’

BrianD3 2011/09/27 12:59:44
Good call!!!
Poor choice
You!
Add Photos & Videos


Gov. Chris Christie of New Jersey on Monday blocked a $420,000 tax credit that the state’s Economic Development Authority had approved last week.


Was the loser a high-tech startup? An alternative energy company, perhaps?


No. It was Snooki and the Situation.


The production company behind the reality series “Jersey Shore” had applied for the credit, intended to expand film and television shooting in the state, to help cover costs for its inaugural season in 2009.


Mr. Christie said he was “duty-bound” to see that taxpayers were “not footing a $420,000 bill for a project which does nothing more than perpetuate misconceptions about the state and its citizens.”


“In this difficult fiscal climate,” he wrote to Caren S. Franzini, the chief executive of the Economic Development Authority, “the taxpayers of New Jersey should not be forced to subsidize projects such as ‘Jersey Shore.’ ”


“Jersey Shore,” shown on MTV, is hardly the only reality program to get economic help from the state in which it sets up its cameras. One show, “Sarah Palin’s Alaska,” generated a small tempest on blogs by claiming $1.2 million in Alaska tax credits under a plan that Ms. Palin had signed into law in 2008, when she was governor.


Mr. Christie told Ms. Franzini that he was not stopping other applications that had gotten the green light from the authority. Among them were tax credits totaling $9 million for a production company behind “Law & Order: Special Victims Unit,” the long-running television drama about detectives on the New York side of the Hudson River, and $176,900 for three films.


Jeannie Kedas, a spokeswoman for MTV, said Mr. Christie’s veto of the credit “does not affect the show.”


State Senator Joseph F. Vitale, a Democrat from Middlesex County who had opposed the tax credit for “Jersey Shore,” applauded Mr. Christie’s action.


“It’s about the words, and words matter,” Mr. Vitale, a Democrat from Middlesex County, said. “The words the cast members use to describe Italian-Americans, ‘Guido’ and others, are no different to me than words used to disparage other ethnic groups or races. It wouldn’t be an appropriate use of taxpayer dollars to support that kind of language. That’s my beef with the show.”


But it is not his only beef. “It’s just a bunch of deadwoods getting drunk and getting arrested,” he said. “I’m a big fan of turning the channel.”

Read More: http://www.nytimes.com/2011/09/27/nyregion/christi...

Add a comment above

Top Opinion

  • wtf 2011/09/27 13:20:58
    Good call!!!
    wtf
    +4
    Taxpayers should not have to subsidized "crap TV" when these people collectively are making millions.

Sort By
  • Most Raves
  • Least Raves
  • Oldest
  • Newest
Opinions

  • TruBluTopaz 2011/10/08 02:05:23
    Good call!!!
    TruBluTopaz
    +1
    Frankly I would love to see him enact a Snookie tax just for her being in New Jersey. What a stupid offensive bunch of people are glorified on that silly show......
  • Soundstorm 2011/10/07 02:02:25
    Good call!!!
    Soundstorm
    +1
    Does MTV really need the hard pressed New Jersey taxpayers to subsidise their minstrel entertainment? And liberals in the media like to lecture everybody about how the rich can afford to make do with less. Who feels as rich as MTV?
  • WhereIsAmerica? ~PWCM~JLA 2011/09/27 23:47:59
    Good call!!!
    WhereIsAmerica? ~PWCM~JLA
    +2
    Go Chris!
  • Dee 2011/09/27 15:53:34
    Good call!!!
    Dee
    +3
    The Jersey Shore Production Company should be paying us.
  • davidl 2011/09/27 15:04:02
    Good call!!!
    davidl
    +2
    Who in the hell, specifically, authorized the $ in the first place? Fire him or her.
  • All American 2011/09/27 14:32:26
    Good call!!!
    All American
    +2
    It worries me about America's future that programs like this are so popular.
  • TheTailor 2011/09/27 14:03:19
    Good call!!!
    TheTailor
    +3
    What were they thinking to give taxpayer dollars to any show? I think the concept is fundamentally flawed.
  • BrianD3 TheTailor 2011/09/27 14:08:54
    BrianD3
    +2
    probably tried to justify it as creating jobs and also a way to promote local businesses and clubs
  • TheTailor BrianD3 2011/09/27 14:11:38
    TheTailor
    +2
    Probably, but that's what I consider flawed thinking, the market doesn't need to be subsidized. Good observation though, noted.
  • BrianD3 2011/09/27 13:36:05
    Good call!!!
    BrianD3
    +3
    good call!!! the show glorifed drunk, obnoxious losers and perpetuated a sterotype that should not be given new life
  • Soundstorm BrianD3 2011/10/07 02:10:01
    Soundstorm
    Call me cynical but I have a sneaking suspicion the behavior and incidents on this show are mostly staged in a manner similar to professional wrestling. That's how you chase ratings.
  • wtf 2011/09/27 13:20:58
    Good call!!!
    wtf
    +4
    Taxpayers should not have to subsidized "crap TV" when these people collectively are making millions.
  • Dale 2011/09/27 13:05:49
    Good call!!!
    Dale
    +3
    "But it is not his only beef. “It’s just a bunch of deadwoods getting drunk and getting arrested,” he said. “I’m a big fan of turning the channel.”

    And that just about sez' it all.
  • TheTailor Dale 2011/09/27 14:05:19
    TheTailor
    +3
    Heh, I wouldn't allow the channel to be set for that show in the first place.
  • Dale TheTailor 2011/09/27 14:15:10
    Dale
    +2
    I have never seen it except for excerpts.
  • TheTailor Dale 2011/09/27 14:16:25
    TheTailor
    +2
    I wouldn't waste my time with excerpts :-)

See Votes by State

The map above displays the winning answer by region.

News & Politics

2013/05/22 02:55:45

Hot Questions on SodaHead
More Hot Questions

More Community More Originals