SodaHead Celebrates Green Week

Question US

Chilling: Government Computers Used to Go After Private Citizen Who Questioned Candidate; Just a Clue of What an Obama Admin Will Look Like. OMG, What ARE People Thinking???

heart... Restore The Republic October 25, 2008 18:35:07

.
Cross posted from: CorrenteWire.com and The Columbus Dispatch

Chilling: Government Computers Used to Go After A Private Citizen who Questioned A Presidential Candidate
Truth Partisan - Sat, 2008-10-25

-----
Government computers used to find information on Joe the Plumber
Investigators trying to determine whether access was illegal
Friday, October 24, 2008 8:57 PM
By Randy Ludlow - The Columbus Dispatch

"State and local officials are investigating if state and law-enforcement computer systems were illegally accessed when they were tapped for personal information about "Joe the Plumber."

Samuel Joseph Wurzelbacher became part of the national political lexicon Oct. 15 when Republican presidential candidate John McCain mentioned him frequently during his final debate with Democrat Barack Obama.

The 34-year-old from the Toledo suburb of Holland is held out by McCain as an example of an American who would be harmed by Obama's tax proposals.

Public records requested by The Dispatch disclose that information on Wurzelbacher's driver's license or his sport-utility vehicle was pulled from the Ohio Bureau of Motor Vehicles database three times shortly after the debate.

Information on Wurzelbacher was accessed by accounts assigned to the office of Ohio Attorney General Nancy H. Rogers, the Cuyahoga County Child Support Enforcement Agency and the Toledo Police Department.

It has not been determined who checked on Wurzelbacher, or why. Direct access to driver's license and vehicle registration information from BMV computers is restricted to legitimate law enforcement and government business.

Paul Lindsay, Ohio spokesman for the McCain campaign, attempted to portray the inquiries as politically motivated. "It's outrageous to see how quickly Barack Obama's allies would abuse government power in an attempt to smear a private citizen who dared to ask a legitimate question," he said.

Isaac Baker, Obama's Ohio spokesman, denounced Lindsay's statement as charges of desperation from a campaign running out of time. "Invasions of privacy should not be tolerated. If these records were accessed inappropriately, it had nothing to do with our campaign and should be investigated fully," he said.

The attorney general's office is investigating if the access of Wuzelbacher's BMV information through the office's Ohio Law Enforcement Gateway computer system was unauthorized, said spokeswoman Jennifer Brindisi.

"We're trying to pinpoint where it came from," she said. The investigation could become "criminal in nature," she said. Brindisi would not identify the account that pulled the information on Oct. 16.

Records show it was a "test account" assigned to the information technology section of the attorney general's office, said Department of Public Safety spokesman Thomas Hunter.

Brindisi later said investigators have confirmed that Wurzelbacher's information was not accessed within the attorney general's office. She declined to provide details. The office's test accounts are shared with and used by other law enforcement-related agencies, she said.

On Oct. 17, BMV information on Wurzelbacher was obtained through an account used by the Cuyahoga County Child Support Enforcement Agency in Cleveland, records show.

Mary Denihan, spokeswoman for the county agency, said the Ohio Department of Job and Family Services contacted the agency today and requested an investigation of the access to Wurzelbacher's information. Cuyahoga County court records do not show any child-support cases involving Wurzelbacher.

The State Highway Patrol, which administers the Law Enforcement Automated Data System in Ohio, asked Toledo police to explain why it pulled BMV information on Wurzelbacher within 48 hours of the debate, Hunter said.

The LEADS system also can be used to check for warrants and criminal histories, but such checks would not be reflected on the records obtained by The Dispatch.

Sgt. Tim Campbell, a Toledo police spokesman, said he could not provide any information because the department only had learned of the State Highway Patrol inquiry today." //
-----

Truth Partisan: Charges of desperation? The info is coming from the state government. Obama allies, including most of the MSM, have researched, released and published all kinds of private information about Joe the Plumber.

Both Obama and Biden have spoken about Joe the Plumber since Obama bungled the answer to Joe’s question, Biden in particular casting doubt on Joe’s ability to earn $250,000 as a plumber.

Have some Obama allies learned the privacy invasion lessons of some of the Bush Administration and its allies too well?

Whether we agree with the politics of the questioner or not, we need to support the ability and the right of all kinds of private citizens to question public officials and candidates for these offices. It used to be a point of honor amongst some liberals—and some conservatives—to make sure that those with whom they disagreed were heard. Whether the new Administration agrees with our views, or not, we need to preserve the rights of all citizens to question the powerful people who represent us—without risking their own personal and public destruction.

http://www.correntewire.com/chilling_government_computers_use...
http://www.dispatch.com/live/content/local_news/stories/2008/...
.
They're not thinking. Misleading rhetoric and empty promises of 'free money' drowns out the reality, the truth, about socialism.
Thinking? That would require draining the hopey-changey mantra from their saturated brains.
So? The rights of private citizens must give way to the needs of the collective community. 'Private citizen' is an archaic concept.
Barack knows what is best for all of us. He's just awesomely awsome and audacious!
You!
Add Photos & Videos

Top Comment
  • +11 raves Bill - Buffalo Soldier October 25, 2008 19:27:52
    Bill - Buffalo Soldier

    They're not thinking. Misleading rhetoric and empty promises of 'free money' drowns out the reality, the truth, about socialism.

    This is what we have in store - now add in the private federal army (for our security) "with the same resources as the military" that he wants to start; I see one of the worst eras of history repeated.

    I will join the revolution.
    View thread
Sort By
  • Most Raves
  • Least Raves
  • Oldest
  • Newest
Comments
  • +1 raves
    Against Obama November 05, 2008 17:44:18
    Against Obama

    None of the above

    Welcome to socialism in America. Cuba had their chance too in the 50's, and what have they seen ever since?
  • +2 raves
    KARA~American Patriot October 27, 2008 00:46:22 (edited)
    KARA~American Patriot

    They're not thinking. Misleading rhetoric and empty promises of 'free money' drowns out the reality, the truth, about socialism.

    Maybe I am being overly paranoid but yesterday my computer detected spy ware and then when I clicked to see the details, someone tried to download something onto my computer. The down loader would not let me cancel it. So I had to turn off my computer manually, twice to keep that download from happening. It was all so weird.

    I hate to think about what will happen if Obama becomes President.
  • +2 raves
    Toni No Bologny READ b4 VOTING October 26, 2008 16:53:00
    Toni No Bologny READ b4 VOTING

    They're not thinking. Misleading rhetoric and empty promises of 'free money' drowns out the reality, the truth, about socialism.

    They should protect the rights for the non liberals and non Obama fans as WELL. HYPOCRITES!
  • +2 raves
    hmjtrj-11/02/10 "JUDGEMENT ... October 26, 2008 16:08:12 (edited)
    hmjtrj-11/02/10

    They're not thinking. Misleading rhetoric and empty promises of 'free money' drowns out the reality, the truth, about socialism.

    Have you heard the latest? Whats next? Shut them down like ? That's what hugo chavez did/

    October 25th, 2008 9:57 PM Eastern
    YOU DECIDE: Biden Interviewer Fair or Over the Line?
    Joe Biden fielded some pointed questions recently in a five-minute satellite interview with Barbara West of WFTV, a Florida TV station.

    West asked whether Barack Obama’s connection to ACORN was a concern, whether his “spread the wealth” quote was Marxist and whether Biden’s comments about a “generated crisis” suggested America had lost its standing in the world.
    View the interview on youtube. It’s been removed from the WFTV website.
    http://www.youtube.com/watch?...


    The Obama-Biden campaign later told the station it was cutting off access because of the questioning. Did the campaign overreact? Were the interviewer’s questions fair?
  • +1 raves
    KARA~Am... hmjtrj-... October 27, 2008 00:54:41
    KARA~American Patriot
    The interviewer's question was fair. Obama acting the way he did over the questions is problematic considering normal people would just answer the question that Joe Biden was asked.

    Obama wants to be in CONTROL of every move and every person. acting questions problematic normal people answer joe biden obama person
  • +3 raves
    Feline Lover ~ American Pat... October 26, 2008 15:26:15
    Feline Lover ~ American Patriot

    They're not thinking. Misleading rhetoric and empty promises of 'free money' drowns out the reality, the truth, about socialism.

    This is really, really scary. The lengths to which someone would go to find out if there is any "dirt" on a ordinary citizen is horrendous! What next??
  • +2 raves
    Ginnypoo Feline ... October 26, 2008 17:17:59
    Ginnypoo
    There are still those 50 unused FEMA camps all over the country....just waiting to hold people that speak up too loudly or too often. I have no doubts Obam would use them if he got the chance. Where is Reverend Wright, anyway?
  • +1 raves
    heart..... Ginnypoo October 27, 2008 05:49:57
    heart... Restore The Republic
  • +3 raves
    Ruel October 26, 2008 15:05:39
    Ruel

    They're not thinking. Misleading rhetoric and empty promises of 'free money' drowns out the reality, the truth, about socialism.

    The idea that the government will give "free" money to people is a way for Obama to buy votes. Who pays? We all do when Obama says there isn't enough revenue to meet the budget and raises taxes on all wage earners.
  • +3 raves
    Informed Voter October 26, 2008 14:10:45
    Informed Voter

    They're not thinking. Misleading rhetoric and empty promises of 'free money' drowns out the reality, the truth, about socialism.

    Well, at least half the Country ISN'T! That's scary!
    rhetoric promises free money drowns reality truth socialism country scary
  • +3 raves
    upthecreek October 26, 2008 09:43:11 (edited)
    upthecreek

    They're not thinking. Misleading rhetoric and empty promises of 'free money' drowns out the reality, the truth, about socialism.

    Its Scarry to see this happening to one comon guy that asked a simple question

    wake up this one example of whats coming when the dems. have total power over executive/legislative and soon to be Judicial branches. no check and balance
  • +2 raves
    Ginnypoo October 26, 2008 04:27:30
    Ginnypoo

    They're not thinking. Misleading rhetoric and empty promises of 'free money' drowns out the reality, the truth, about socialism.

    They are working double time to ruin this country...it scares me s(*^&tless that so many stand idly by while this great country is being dismantled piece by precious piece. They do not even realize this is the only country where freedom of speech exists, this is the only country where literally anyone can be anything they want, where freedom is practiced and not just a dream. I cannot ever imagine taking this kind of thing lightly....but apparently koolaid ruins not only your thinking but your judgement and your will to survive.
  • +2 raves
    heart..... Ginnypoo October 26, 2008 14:50:06
    heart... Restore The Republic
    Very well said and, sadly, too true.
  • gardengod Ginnypoo October 26, 2008 16:54:15
    gardengod
    Freedom of speech, it was the Bush administration who gave up a CIA operative because her husband spoke out against the war in Iraq. The Dixie Chicks were labeled terrorists because they sang against the war. You spoke out against the war you were unpatriotic, there's freedom of speech allright if you believe what Bush is doing.
  • +2 raves
    heart..... gardengod October 26, 2008 17:10:36
    heart... Restore The Republic
    The loss of our rights and freedoms is NOT A partisan issue nor is it confined to Republicans. No offense intended but to believe that Democrats/Liberals will protect one single American citizen, one single right or one single freedom is either naive or willfully blind to the facts. Far left and far right are *both* very much the same in the denial of the rights of 'we the people'.
  • +1 raves
    Ginnypoo gardengod October 26, 2008 17:13:49 (edited)
    Ginnypoo
    There is a difference....whether you choose to see it or not. Joe is a private citizen, was at his own home, and Obama went there and spoke to him. How would you feel if you were in your yard and McCain walked up the block? Would you ask a question? If so, would you then become meat for the MSM to chew up and spit out? If so how would you feel?

    The Dixie chicks said they felt ashamed of Bush but they were public people, and the media did what it did to them. The Plame case was political and once again the media ran with it as fast and as far as they could. Do you see any commonality in these cases....I sure do. The MSM did a hatchet job in all these cases. They tore into the "fresh meat" as if they were starved. Does the media have any responsibility to show common sense or any intelligent discrimination in what they report on and how they handle stories? Is there an underlying factor of putting the good of their own country ahead of sensationalizing every scrap they get? Do they feel any patriotism or responsibility to protect agents under cover? Do they feel any gratitude for their own freedoms? Do they have any respect for the rule of law or the people of this land? Or do they have some mentality of "who gives a crap who or what is ruined" just to get a byline? I wonder if ...
    There is a difference....whether you choose to see it or not. Joe is a private citizen, was at his own home, and Obama went there and spoke to him. How would you feel if you were in your yard and McCain walked up the block? Would you ask a question? If so, would you then become meat for the MSM to chew up and spit out? If so how would you feel?

    The Dixie chicks said they felt ashamed of Bush but they were public people, and the media did what it did to them. The Plame case was political and once again the media ran with it as fast and as far as they could. Do you see any commonality in these cases....I sure do. The MSM did a hatchet job in all these cases. They tore into the "fresh meat" as if they were starved. Does the media have any responsibility to show common sense or any intelligent discrimination in what they report on and how they handle stories? Is there an underlying factor of putting the good of their own country ahead of sensationalizing every scrap they get? Do they feel any patriotism or responsibility to protect agents under cover? Do they feel any gratitude for their own freedoms? Do they have any respect for the rule of law or the people of this land? Or do they have some mentality of "who gives a crap who or what is ruined" just to get a byline? I wonder if they even think about the fact that in any other country they would not be allowed the freedom they abuse in this country. In the Plame case the media was used because Bush et al understood that media people hold no respect for life or country that would hold them back from endangering an agent. They saw that MSM reporters do not even care about their own freedom enough to ever question why someone would reveal that kind of info. They have no common sense about when or what to reveal. It is very alarming that if given the chance they might reveal state secrets that would topple our government and cause the deaths of many innocent people. Take as an example the stupidity Geraldo displayed during the Iraq invasion when he drew in the dirt information of his units location in such detail he could have caused his own death by counter attack. They seem to be brilliantly stupid, or stupidly ignorant and it makes me wonder sometimes exactly who's side they are on.
    (more)
  • +1 raves
    Saintsfan - Right Wing Extr... October 25, 2008 23:10:38
    Saintsfan - Right Wing Extremist

    Barack knows what is best for all of us. He's just awesomely awsome and audacious!

    I picked the funny one, because it's hilarious!
  • +3 raves
    hdsporty October 25, 2008 22:09:39
    hdsporty

    Thinking? That would require draining the hopey-changey mantra from their saturated brains.

    and people fail to recognize rights are being compromised by the dems. As a citizen, I'm outraged that anyone would do this, led by the campaign or by misguided individuals.
  • +3 raves
    No Name October 25, 2008 21:47:38
    No Name

    None of the above

    moderated...
  • +2 raves
    heart..... No Name October 26, 2008 15:48:09 (edited)
    heart... Restore The Republic
    I was thinking this morning about just that... but my mind automatically swung to the belief that as Americans, who we fundamentally ARE, surely the majority of us cannot -will not- allow the very foundation, and fundamental beliefs, of our country to be rewritten.

    We are a relatively young country and unique in that we were founded on and for the establishment and preservation of democratic rights; that, where there would be government, citizens would play a very strong role in exactly *what* that government was. Now many seem to have forgotten that and want to hand those rights off to the government as if any group of people, with their own agendas, know better that any citizen what is best for us.

    I agree with much you said in a comment on one of my blogs in reference to... "it is the Right of the People to alter or to abolish it, and to institute new Government, [laying its foundation on such principles and organizing its powers in such form, as to them shall seem most likely to effect their Safety and Happiness.]" In a perfect world we would be able to rise up and sweep clean, not the government, but the people that have tried to harness it for their own ends.

    Don't get me wrong... I abhor the rights being covertly and overtly stripped from Americans; I abhor the way the r...







    I was thinking this morning about just that... but my mind automatically swung to the belief that as Americans, who we fundamentally ARE, surely the majority of us cannot -will not- allow the very foundation, and fundamental beliefs, of our country to be rewritten.

    We are a relatively young country and unique in that we were founded on and for the establishment and preservation of democratic rights; that, where there would be government, citizens would play a very strong role in exactly *what* that government was. Now many seem to have forgotten that and want to hand those rights off to the government as if any group of people, with their own agendas, know better that any citizen what is best for us.

    I agree with much you said in a comment on one of my blogs in reference to... "it is the Right of the People to alter or to abolish it, and to institute new Government, [laying its foundation on such principles and organizing its powers in such form, as to them shall seem most likely to effect their Safety and Happiness.]" In a perfect world we would be able to rise up and sweep clean, not the government, but the people that have tried to harness it for their own ends.

    Don't get me wrong... I abhor the rights being covertly and overtly stripped from Americans; I abhor the way the reins have been taken from 'we the people' and are now firmly held by elected officials of both parties. And I do not believe it is something that has been limited to the last administration but rather something that goes back a lot further.

    Having said that I have to acknowledge that, at this time, we have few choices. With all my heart, and love for this country, I do not believe becoming a collectivist society is the answer. It may sound all 'new world' and kumbaya to imagine a brighter world where we can all hold hands and help one another by sacrificing. But we would simply be sacrificing MORE rights and freedoms and giving more power to a government that cares for nothing more than gaining more power and silencing dissent. That is exactly what that kind of society would mean.

    I am not a hard core fan of John McCain... I disagree with him on some issues important to me... but in looking at the bigger picture of what America fundamentally IS I see him as the only currently available genuine solution -because he falls more in line with what is intrinsically and historically American... less government, reduced spending, controlled taxation- and I have to be honest enough to admit that while he may not be *the* solution he is at least standing in the center. It's not a matter of voting against Obama but rather the choice of voting what I think is 'in defense' of historic America.

    We can look at history, recent and ancient, at societies that have failed... and collectivist societies fail every time and fail dramatically. As I said, America was and is an experiment in Democracy and to end that in some rash hope for change is, in my opinion, a big mistake.

    [morning rant over... time for breakfast!]
    (more)
  • +2 raves
    Ginnypoo heart..... October 26, 2008 17:28:40 (edited)
    Ginnypoo
    Very well put...I agree that to adopt a socialist mindset of "share the wealth" sounds good if you have no wealth to lose, which I don't, but it is fundamentally unAmerican and makes me afraid that too many will buy into the wanting of money and not look at the larger picture of "then where will we be" and will our basic beliefs in who and what America is still be intact. I question anyone willing to gamble away their own freedom for cash. I question their morals, their mentality and their patriotism. I understand being poor and the desperation you can have, but to not look at the whole of it throws the entire country in the garbage for a small amount of money that in the grand scheme will not really change their lives at all, it would at best give them a month or two of having followed by an even bigger drop of not having, after the taste of it will they even see what they threw away.
  • +1 raves
    No Name Ginnypoo October 26, 2008 18:26:22
    No Name
    moderated...
  • +1 raves
    No Name heart..... October 26, 2008 18:22:44
    No Name
    moderated...
  • +1 raves
    heart..... No Name October 27, 2008 05:53:18
    heart... Restore The Republic
    Thanks for the inspiration and for making me think some things through... 'out loud'!
  • +1 raves
    No Name heart..... October 27, 2008 15:58:18
    No Name
    moderated...
  • +2 raves
    Marty9957 October 25, 2008 20:46:35
    Marty9957

    Thinking? That would require draining the hopey-changey mantra from their saturated brains.

    Here we go again - those government types thinking they are above the law. Doggone it, I just wish there was someone up there who would hold their feet to the fire or is it make an example out of their collective a**es. (Oh that's right, John McCain and Sarah Palin want to name names).
  • +4 raves
    MS October 25, 2008 20:32:10
    MS

    None of the above

    Government has much more sophisticated IT than I do, but on my network you have to have a PW to access anything and if I want to track who accessed anything, I can tell exactly who, from what device and when, then scan that person's activity over any time period I choose. I have a HARD time imagining that government can't do the same thing. If they can't a lot of IT people should be unemployeed IMMEDIATELY.
  • +4 raves
    Sammy the Hatchet October 25, 2008 20:27:37
    Sammy the Hatchet

    So? The rights of private citizens must give way to the needs of the collective community. 'Private citizen' is an archaic concept.

    1984 all over again. We'd better start speaking and thinking right otherwise............... oh never mind...... hand me another can of gun oil I need to get ready.
  • +5 raves
    Gwama- Patriot † In God We... October 25, 2008 19:45:59 (edited)
    Gwama- Patriot  † In God We Trust †

    Thinking? That would require draining the hopey-changey mantra from their saturated brains.

    I call them Obamanites! my girlfriend that is voting for him is so out in lala land that it is ridiculOs.!. be very afraid this is her quote: "Barrack is going to be tested and we have to stick with him because he will do something SCARY and we wont agree with him but its for our own good" AM I IN THE TWIGHLIGHT ZONE.? DO THEY HAVE SOME TYPE OF CULT MEETINGS THE REST OF US DON'T KNOW ABOUT? barrack tested stick scary twighlight zone type cult meetings rest
  • +6 raves
    no Kidding October 25, 2008 19:29:21
    no Kidding

    Thinking? That would require draining the hopey-changey mantra from their saturated brains.

    But Wait, It is Senator Obama of whom you speak, how durst you challenge his highness. He can do no wrong, it's all OK.
  • +6 raves
    Bewildered~Proud Republican October 25, 2008 19:29:05
    Bewildered~Proud Republican

    They're not thinking. Misleading rhetoric and empty promises of 'free money' drowns out the reality, the truth, about socialism.

    Just a taste of what will become of America if obama is elected. There will be so much more to come. For the worse. We will not have the Great Country we once had if he's elected.
  • +2 raves
    Ginnypoo Bewilde... October 26, 2008 17:29:49
    Ginnypoo
    And many will not even have their pride when they realize it was they that caused it.
  • +11 raves
    Bill - Buffalo Soldier October 25, 2008 19:27:52
    Bill - Buffalo Soldier

    They're not thinking. Misleading rhetoric and empty promises of 'free money' drowns out the reality, the truth, about socialism.

    This is what we have in store - now add in the private federal army (for our security) "with the same resources as the military" that he wants to start; I see one of the worst eras of history repeated.

    I will join the revolution.
  • +7 raves
    OhioCri... Bill - ... October 25, 2008 19:37:33
    OhioCritter-Adopt a Homeless Pet
    BBill- I will stand beside you in the revolution.
  • +7 raves
    heart..... OhioCri... October 25, 2008 19:53:01
    heart... Restore The Republic
    And I, along with my entire family and all of my friends.
  • +1 raves
    Yoda heart..... October 31, 2008 20:57:13
    Yoda
    I am still waiting for my alarm to go off and to wake up and realize, this was just a horrible nightmare after all!
  • +5 raves
    Marty9957 Bill - ... October 25, 2008 20:40:55
    Marty9957
    We'll join you and create our own 24th or 25th Inf. (This time we can make it an integrated regiment)
  • +4 raves
    hdsporty Marty9957 October 25, 2008 22:05:26
    hdsporty
    I'll stand with you too. I'm pretty good with a rifle.
  • +2 raves
    Ginnypoo hdsporty October 26, 2008 17:30:48
    Ginnypoo
    I'm just a floral designer but am pretty good with my little knife......
  • +1 raves
    hdsporty Ginnypoo October 26, 2008 18:09:19
    hdsporty
    Is it like a bird beak knife? Those look pretty wicked. lol
or
Cancel