Quantcast

Chief Justice Roberts Is A Genius

Teri- Oregon 2012/06/28 23:40:22
You!
Add Photos & Videos

Before you look to do harm to Chief Justice Roberts or his family, it’s important that you think carefully about the meaning – the true nature — of his ruling on Obama-care. The Left will shout that they won, that Obama-care was upheld and all the rest. Let them.

It will be a short-lived celebration.

Here’s what really occurred — payback. Yes, payback for Obama’s numerous, ill-advised and childish insults directed toward SCOTUS.

Chief Justice Roberts actually ruled the mandate, relative to the commerce clause, was unconstitutional. That’s how the Democrats got Obama-care going in the first place. This is critical. His ruling means Congress can’t compel American citizens to purchase anything. Ever. The notion is now officially and forever, unconstitutional. As it should be.

Next, he stated that, because Congress doesn’t have the ability to mandate, it must, to fund Obama-care, rely on its power to tax. Therefore, the mechanism that funds Obama-care is a tax. This is also critical. Recall back during the initial Obama-care battles, the Democrats called it a penalty, Republicans called it a tax. Democrats consistently soft sold it as a penalty. It went to vote as a penalty. Obama declared endlessly, that it was not a tax, it was a penalty. But when the Democrats argued in front of the Supreme Court, they said ‘hey, a penalty or a tax, either way’. So, Roberts gave them a tax. It is now the official law of the land — beyond word-play and silly shenanigans. Obama-care is funded by tax dollars. Democrats now must defend a tax increase to justify the Obama-care law.

Finally, he struck down as unconstitutional, the Obama-care idea that the federal government can bully states into complying by yanking their existing medicaid funding. Liberals, through Obama-care, basically said to the states — ‘comply with Obama-care or we will stop existing funding.’ Roberts ruled that is a no-no. If a state takes the money, fine, the Feds can tell the state how to run a program, but if the state refuses money, the federal government can’t penalize the state by yanking other funding. Therefore, a state can decline to participate in Obama-care without penalty. This is obviously a serious problem. Are we going to have 10, 12, 25 states not participating in “national” health-care? Suddenly, it’s not national, is it?

Ultimately, Roberts supported states rights by limiting the federal government’s coercive abilities. He ruled that the government can not force the people to purchase products or services under the commerce clause and he forced liberals to have to come clean and admit that Obama-care is funded by tax increases.

Although he didn’t guarantee Romney a win, he certainly did more than his part and should be applauded.

And he did this without creating a civil war or having bricks thrown through his windshield. Oh, and he’ll be home in time for dinner.

Brilliant.
http://www.imcitizen.net/chief-justice-roberts-is-a-genius/

Read More: http://www.imcitizen.net/chief-justice-roberts-is-...

Add a comment above

Top Opinion

  • Technotrucker_exposingthetruth 2012/06/29 03:58:58
    I think
    Technotrucker_exposingthetruth
    +4
    This is the first clear explanation of his motives I have seen. I have to completely agree, utter genius. Since the use of the Commerce clause is ruled unconstitutional, then it has to be a tax. Therefore, they will now have to explain to the people why they are taking an extra $1,000.00 or more a month out of their paychecks. Even if they have a health care provider, they will inevitably be taxed. To compensate for those that don't or can't afford the law, they will have to tax those that can. That means the rich will be forced to pick up yet another tab to cover the costs.
    Still even craftier, telling the fed they cannot cut funding to the states for opting out, means that there will undoubtedly be only a handful of states that will accept the imposition. There are already 32 that have filed suits to stop it, so they will undoubtedly not be participating. Once the people of the states that are accepting, realize that their paychecks are going to be hit to pay for those on the welfare role of obammiecare, they will, if they are smart, force their state reps to also opt out.
    To add insult to injury, now the obammie clan will have to go back to the people and explain to them why this isn't really a tax, even though to make it remain a law, it has to be called a tax, so they ...

    This is the first clear explanation of his motives I have seen. I have to completely agree, utter genius. Since the use of the Commerce clause is ruled unconstitutional, then it has to be a tax. Therefore, they will now have to explain to the people why they are taking an extra $1,000.00 or more a month out of their paychecks. Even if they have a health care provider, they will inevitably be taxed. To compensate for those that don't or can't afford the law, they will have to tax those that can. That means the rich will be forced to pick up yet another tab to cover the costs.
    Still even craftier, telling the fed they cannot cut funding to the states for opting out, means that there will undoubtedly be only a handful of states that will accept the imposition. There are already 32 that have filed suits to stop it, so they will undoubtedly not be participating. Once the people of the states that are accepting, realize that their paychecks are going to be hit to pay for those on the welfare role of obammiecare, they will, if they are smart, force their state reps to also opt out.
    To add insult to injury, now the obammie clan will have to go back to the people and explain to them why this isn't really a tax, even though to make it remain a law, it has to be called a tax, so they will be lying through their teeth. Even this lie should be obvious to the most small minded and delusional of supporters of this fraud and his cronies. If it isn't it will be once they see the tiny bit of income left at the end of the week.
    People that are calling Roberts a sell out and wish him harm, need to read this article again, maybe two or three times. This is as big a slap in the face to the Democrats as the recent election in Wisconsin. This is HUGE by any stretch of the imagination.
    I want to thank you personally for posting this. For I too was tempted to join the lynch mob that would most certainly be growing in the next few days at Roberts' expense.
    (more)

Sort By
  • Most Raves
  • Least Raves
  • Oldest
  • Newest
Opinions

  • Idiot repubs 2012/06/30 18:18:49
    I think
    Idiot repubs
    Roberts only motivation was to keep his supreme court from being the most political and corrupt in history.
  • jubil8 BN-0 PON 2012/06/30 18:12:37 (edited)
    I think
    jubil8 BN-0 PON
    +1
    Yes!

    Whether you agree with Justice Roberts' political positions or not, he's reputed to be an outstanding legal scholar. This decision certainly supports that belief.

    P.S. Great article, Teri, tx.
  • jackolantyrn356 2012/06/29 17:18:25
    I think
    jackolantyrn356
    Comrade Roberts is a Marxist
  • George ... jackola... 2012/06/29 18:36:24
    George Romney
    +1
    How so?
  • JL 2012/06/29 11:43:35
    Well, Maybe
    JL
    +1
    I CAN ONLY HOPE AND PRAY THAT THIS MAN HAS A PURPOSE BEYOND THE SHORT TERM...
  • Jeff Smith 2012/06/29 04:30:26
    I think
    Jeff Smith
    +1
    Obama has allot of explaining to do. I can't wait to hear his spin on this.Tax increases for everyone across the board including the poor. Ha obama just FCKED himself
  • Technotrucker_exposingthetruth 2012/06/29 03:58:58
    I think
    Technotrucker_exposingthetruth
    +4
    This is the first clear explanation of his motives I have seen. I have to completely agree, utter genius. Since the use of the Commerce clause is ruled unconstitutional, then it has to be a tax. Therefore, they will now have to explain to the people why they are taking an extra $1,000.00 or more a month out of their paychecks. Even if they have a health care provider, they will inevitably be taxed. To compensate for those that don't or can't afford the law, they will have to tax those that can. That means the rich will be forced to pick up yet another tab to cover the costs.
    Still even craftier, telling the fed they cannot cut funding to the states for opting out, means that there will undoubtedly be only a handful of states that will accept the imposition. There are already 32 that have filed suits to stop it, so they will undoubtedly not be participating. Once the people of the states that are accepting, realize that their paychecks are going to be hit to pay for those on the welfare role of obammiecare, they will, if they are smart, force their state reps to also opt out.
    To add insult to injury, now the obammie clan will have to go back to the people and explain to them why this isn't really a tax, even though to make it remain a law, it has to be called a tax, so they ...

    This is the first clear explanation of his motives I have seen. I have to completely agree, utter genius. Since the use of the Commerce clause is ruled unconstitutional, then it has to be a tax. Therefore, they will now have to explain to the people why they are taking an extra $1,000.00 or more a month out of their paychecks. Even if they have a health care provider, they will inevitably be taxed. To compensate for those that don't or can't afford the law, they will have to tax those that can. That means the rich will be forced to pick up yet another tab to cover the costs.
    Still even craftier, telling the fed they cannot cut funding to the states for opting out, means that there will undoubtedly be only a handful of states that will accept the imposition. There are already 32 that have filed suits to stop it, so they will undoubtedly not be participating. Once the people of the states that are accepting, realize that their paychecks are going to be hit to pay for those on the welfare role of obammiecare, they will, if they are smart, force their state reps to also opt out.
    To add insult to injury, now the obammie clan will have to go back to the people and explain to them why this isn't really a tax, even though to make it remain a law, it has to be called a tax, so they will be lying through their teeth. Even this lie should be obvious to the most small minded and delusional of supporters of this fraud and his cronies. If it isn't it will be once they see the tiny bit of income left at the end of the week.
    People that are calling Roberts a sell out and wish him harm, need to read this article again, maybe two or three times. This is as big a slap in the face to the Democrats as the recent election in Wisconsin. This is HUGE by any stretch of the imagination.
    I want to thank you personally for posting this. For I too was tempted to join the lynch mob that would most certainly be growing in the next few days at Roberts' expense.
    (more)
  • wtw 2012/06/29 03:48:22
    I think
    wtw
    +1
    Obama intimidated and threatened him or his family.
  • Technot... wtw 2012/06/29 04:01:49
    Technotrucker_exposingthetruth
    +2
    You need to re-read this article. This was a slap in the face to BO. You have to see the real meaning behind the decision.
  • wtw Technot... 2012/06/29 13:20:46
    wtw
    +1
    I will thanks!
  • WhereIsAmerica? ~PWCM~JLA 2012/06/29 03:27:41
    I think
    WhereIsAmerica? ~PWCM~JLA
    +1
    I hope it helps Romney win...but I still think Roberts was wrong.
  • Technot... WhereIs... 2012/06/29 04:02:38
    Technotrucker_exposingthetruth
    +5
    If you go back and really understand what he did, it was exactly what had to be done. He has actually given states a way out. They can opt out without penalty.
  • Soup Man 2012/06/29 02:53:02 (edited)
    I think
    Soup Man
    +2
    For all the Obama-lovers out there, many of whom are my family and friends, how do you like him now? Actually, I’m sure you haven’t changed your perspective and are reveling today but I hope you, no I know you will, eventually come to understand what happened today. The World’s Largest Tax Increase ever will be imposed on the U.S. citizenry.

    The only way Obamacare was ruled legal by the SCOTUS was that it be recognized as a TAX! Obama ran as an anti-tax candidate and you believed him and now he will forever be known as the one who brought the largest tax ever imposed on a people of any country and sadly it’s ours. You will pay for this one route or another. You want to buy the Federal Health Insurance go ahead…spend the money (oh and if you don’t know it may cost a little at first but costs increase steadily thereafter, per the Congressional Business Office (CBO) report on the program) and buy the coverage. Don’t want the coverage, don’t think you need insurance right now (and many don’t want insurance right now because they believe they are in good health) you will pay a penalty though a very high tax on your tax return. You will pay if you do and you will pay if you don’t.

    Also, according to the Congressional Budget Office report, the imposition of this law will result i...





    For all the Obama-lovers out there, many of whom are my family and friends, how do you like him now? Actually, I’m sure you haven’t changed your perspective and are reveling today but I hope you, no I know you will, eventually come to understand what happened today. The World’s Largest Tax Increase ever will be imposed on the U.S. citizenry.

    The only way Obamacare was ruled legal by the SCOTUS was that it be recognized as a TAX! Obama ran as an anti-tax candidate and you believed him and now he will forever be known as the one who brought the largest tax ever imposed on a people of any country and sadly it’s ours. You will pay for this one route or another. You want to buy the Federal Health Insurance go ahead…spend the money (oh and if you don’t know it may cost a little at first but costs increase steadily thereafter, per the Congressional Business Office (CBO) report on the program) and buy the coverage. Don’t want the coverage, don’t think you need insurance right now (and many don’t want insurance right now because they believe they are in good health) you will pay a penalty though a very high tax on your tax return. You will pay if you do and you will pay if you don’t.

    Also, according to the Congressional Budget Office report, the imposition of this law will result in the loss of more than 700,000 American jobs and that will be a very quick result to this program. Now considering that the Constitution was violated by Obama to make hundred’s of thousands of illegal immigrants now legal immigrants and can work in American jobs, where are the 700, 000 legal Americans going to replace their jobs. And, this in an absolutely awful national economy. Again, this is the Congressional Budget Office (CBO) stating this job loss, it’s not rhetoric.

    Also, in the CBO report, the poor are going to have less access to health care, in fact they won’t have health care they will only have emergency room treatment. Those who will have health insurance will now be able to get health care that includes preventative measures and so much more. The “great divide” between the two tiers has been widened by this ruling. How does that make you feel Obama supporters? Read the CBO report and educate your mind rather than working from your emotions.

    Now how is this opportunity for future regulations in this country going to sit with my Obama-lover friends? This decision now allows Congress, or any other government entity (can you say New York Mayor Gov. Michael Bloomberg) to issue mandates for anything they want to impose because legal precedence has been set that will apply to future legal interpretations. So what will you think when a Congressional majority mandates that everyone must own a gun or pay a tax if you don’t? How about everyone must eat seafood at least once a week and if you don’t or can’t because of allergies you will be taxed for your non-compliance. Don’t like diesel pickups? Hmmm… you could be forced to own one if it is mandated. Don’t like tiny two-person electric cars the size of a golf cart? Then get ready to pay a tax if such vehicles become mandated. Like air conditioning? Maybe not for too much longer. So I know you think this is a stretch but again the legal precedence has been set. Give it time.

    Good luck with the future my dear friends of Obama if this never changes from the legislative actions of a future administration. America as we have known it will be no more…and yes there are a lot of people who can’t wait for that change and to become Government Sheepeople. Not me however, and not a lot of other people either.
    (more)
  • Teri- O... Soup Man 2012/06/29 03:22:50
    Teri- Oregon
    +4
    Welcome to the revolution!
  • DizziNY 2012/06/29 02:28:10 (edited)
    I think
    DizziNY
    +2
    This guy sucks, he is NO genius. He made the health mandate a tax.I hope your enjoy your RFID chips.
  • Teri- O... DizziNY 2012/06/29 02:54:10
    Teri- Oregon
    +3
    Dizzy did you read the article, in order for the congress to implement the health mandate they have to tax it. they can't lie and say its not a tax anymore. and they can't make people follow the mandate.
  • Technot... DizziNY 2012/06/29 04:03:44
    Technotrucker_exposingthetruth
    +3
    You really do need to re-read it. It is utter genius. He gave the states an out, and people are going to raise hell before paying another tax to cover those without health care.
  • I think
    ☆The Rock☆ * AFCL* The Sheriff!!
    +2
    I think Roberts is a FN sellout!!!
  • Teri- O... ☆The Ro... 2012/06/29 02:54:28
    Teri- Oregon
    +3
    did you read the article, in order for the congress to implement the health mandate they have to tax it. they can't lie and say its not a tax anymore. and they can't make people follow the mandate.
  • Technot... ☆The Ro... 2012/06/29 04:04:16
    Technotrucker_exposingthetruth
    +2
    Read it again Rock. He did exactly what he had to do. Read my post above.
  • Temlakos~POTL~PWCM~JLA~☆ 2012/06/29 00:48:06
    I think
    Temlakos~POTL~PWCM~JLA~☆
    +1
    You are too kind to CJ Roberts. By calling it a tax he essentially gave Congress a blank check to tax anyone at all, in any amount, for any reason or no reason. Not in this Republic!

    Now if you mean that, as a result, we'll get a debate on what taxation should be all about, I'll accept that result. *If* we get a Constitutional amendment that clarifies that you may not tax a man to collect the fine that the Constitution otherwise forbids!
  • Teri- O... Temlako... 2012/06/29 02:55:36
    Teri- Oregon
    +4
    he effectively woke up more american's from the lie, and started the act of a revolution that time has come
  • Temlako... Teri- O... 2012/06/29 03:17:12
    Temlakos~POTL~PWCM~JLA~☆
    We can both agree, can we not, that this was not his intent.

    I have a friend who made three specific suggestions:

    http://www.sodahead.com/unite...

    What sort of revolution had you in mind? Or should I ask in a forum like this?
  • Teri- O... Temlako... 2012/06/29 03:24:34
    Teri- Oregon
    +3
    One similar to France when the people beheaded their king! :) And honestly I think it was his way of insuring that Romney would get the majority of the votes because he wasn't doing so well in the polls.
  • Technot... Teri- O... 2012/06/29 04:05:38
    Technotrucker_exposingthetruth
    +3
    Teri, for whatever reason, they are not comprehending what he did. I don't understand why, but he did exactly what he had to do. This will be seen as a classic decision throughout history. I understand it completely.
  • Teri- O... Technot... 2012/06/29 04:20:30
    Teri- Oregon
    +3
    thank you I thought maybe I read more into it than was there at first.
  • Technot... Teri- O... 2012/06/29 04:23:35
    Technotrucker_exposingthetruth
    +3
    Nope, you are right on the money posting this. Very eye opening. BO thinks he pulled a fast one, LMAO! He got skewered and it ain't gonna be pretty.
  • stevmackey 2012/06/28 23:41:25
    I think
    stevmackey
    +3
    That he overstepped his ground. His decision was greatly prejudiced.
  • Teri- O... stevmackey 2012/06/29 02:55:52

See Votes by State

The map above displays the winning answer by region.

News & Politics

2013/05/24 13:43:55

Hot Questions on SodaHead
More Hot Questions

More Community More Originals