Chick-Fil-A dealt with a storm of bad press a short while ago because of a statement by Dan Cathy, the president of the fast-food chain, saying he was "guilty as charged" when asked about his opposition to gay marriage. His comments, along with Chick-Fil-A's monetary donations to anti-gay organizations, led to a media frenzy.
But times have changed. Now, a Chick-Fil-A executive has confirmed that the chicken-loving, fast-food chain will stop donating to such anti-gay groups like Focus on the Family and the Family Research Council, according to The Civil Rights Agenda. Do you think this news is a great step for the fast-food company? Or do you feel that Chick-Fil-A was bullied into making this decision?
NYDAILYNEWS.COM reports:
Chick-Fil-A had plenty of support for its anti-gay-marriage stance, but in the end, the restaurant chain chickened out.
http://www.chick-fil-a.com/Pr...
Get the facts before you presume to know their character. Like the initial distortion that created the issue, the supposed newest "story" about them retracting their position is also totally fabricated. Why? To try to save face because the activists tried to bully a truly honorable company that invests significantly in neutral good causes and and doesn't get involved in politics or social issues, and it backfired.
The company stated they will no longer donate to ANY political party.
Press suckered by Chick-fil-A fairytale
http://www.wnd.com/2012/09/ga...
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/ne...
The link I posted was published 4 days ago and it's called news for a reason.
http://www.wnd.com/2012/09/ga...
The whole thing was a hoax perpetrated by the homosexual activist community to discredit one of the nation's strongest restaurant chains because it won't discriminate - their way or any other way! http://www.chick-fil-a.com/Pr...
It's bad enough that the press and social media was suckered into a total fabrication, but we don't need people expanding the presumptions into areas that even the lie didn't include.
They said no such thing as they have never donated to ANY political party in their entire history.
"their conservative political donation choices"
What "conservative political donations" would that be?
There are none and there never were any.
You've blindly jumped on the bandwagon of lies before checking the facts.
Liberals act as though conservatives should not be allowed to speak their views, yet the liberals and the gay agenda should be allowed to say, do and act in any way they please and there shouldn't be any lip from anyone else.
All the liberals and gay activists on here talk about freedom, yet they want to suppress and take away the freedom of the Chick-fil-A owners.
What a bunch of hypocrites.
Nothing has changed.
The story is a hoax made up by the liberal gay agenda to discredit Chick-fil-a.
“Chick-fil-A says it will stop funding antigay groups” proclaimed the Detroit Free Press.
But it appears the facts are that the company’s anti-discrimination policy remains just as it was months ago – before the controversy over owner Dan Cathy’s Christian beliefs erupted – and its donations appear to have had no new directive applied.
http://www.wnd.com/2012/09/ga...
http://www.chick-fil-a.com/Pr...
The only slight shred of truth that could be even remotely said is that one of the 15 main outreaches that the Cathy family's private foundation (WinShape) funds is marriage retreats designed to strengthen and support marriages (not AFA, not ANTI-gay, not activist groups, etc.). With marriages ending across our society, we desperately need that!
It was bullying, plain and simple, and continuing the lie about it does not help anybody.
And no, the donations haven't "stopped" because they never happened - both the initial distortion and the supposed retraction and donation stoppage are total fabrications.
It would be wise to educate yourself with the facts before commenting on something you know nothing about.
http://www.wnd.com/2012/09/ga...
No, they didn't "cave" - there wasn't anything to it in the first place and there still isn't now. It was made up (and so was the supposed newest "story" about them retracting their position - also totally falsified by the activists). Why? To try to save face because they picked on a truly honorable company that invests significantly in neutral good causes and doesn't have a "view" on gay marriage.
It was bullying to try to make a case that didn't exist so they could use them as a proof case to bully others, and it backfired. Get the facts before you presume.
And you profess to be a college graduate?
Educate yourself on the matter before being foolish and believing the lies.
The point that seems to confuse some is the owner of Chick-Fil-A apparently was using CORPORATE money to the tune of millions to back anti-gay groups. This has nothing to do with his personal views. What he does with his OWN private money and what his views are should not be mingled in his business.
Now we see it was much deeper then this jerkweed just having strong views.
This jerk, and that's now what he is as the primary stockholder in a company had a corporate policy where he actively was against a group that represents between 8-10% of the general population (and a good chunk of his customers) he should expect and should be dragged over the coals by those that knew that, which seems to include a couple smart politicans including the mayor of Chicago that had the goods on this bozo.