Chick-Fil-A and the Fall of America
dePSyChO
2012/08/04 18:04:54
I don't support Chick-Fil-A or their anti-homosexual ideals. But TJ is right about this; while we argue about stupid shit and fight over a fast food restaurant, all we're doing is speeding our fall to the end. Watch the vid and then comment.















Liberals are the ones who push education, try to help with obesity and healthcare, try to expand tolerance for everyone (other religions, races, and all sexual orientation), try to get us out of useless "terrorism" wars that are a sad cover for oil, try to get new energy sources, etc. We're the ones trying to fix this country.
All you want is for it to be a W.A.S.P. paradise that blindly follows an old book instead of focusing on humanity. All you want is to help the rich, who already rule you.
You guys are the reason we're falling.
When was the last time a Republican wanted to get better energy sources besides oil (which brings in money for them/the rich)? When was the last time a Republican really fought for things like gay marriage equality or getting out of useless wars? What about fighting for the separation of Church and State (the way it should be)?
And I don't think you want to see anything besides what the Bible says.
Now I'd like to see civilization run on dylithium crystals as much as the next tree smoocher. But the better energy sources just ain't there. Obama dropped a huge load of taxpayer dollars to prove that. Your bill for that will be in the mail. Assuming we still have mail service.
Being condescending about Global Warming? Don't tell me you're one of those deniers. That'd make you stupid. In any case, things light Light Water Salt Reactors (a type of nuclear reactor) can give huge amounts of energy for very little. Wind, solar and water work better in smaller countries, but augmenting them with something like nuclear energy could help us. Or even steam power, which is getting new uses. We don't have to be Big Oil's bitch.
>Obama dropped a huge load of taxpayer dollars to prove that.
Yes, Solana (spelling?) failed. Doesn't mean other things will, or that we shouldn't try. And I'd much rather have my tax money going towards new energy and technology and R&D instead of unnecessary wars.
>Assuming we still have mail service.
Who needs physical when we can have digital? That's the way things are heading (and rightfully should be).
Say, is this about energy resources or about Chik-Fil-A? And why are we the only two kooks here lobbing lugies back and forth at each other? Didn't you send out invitations to the rest of your friends list?
Or perhaps they..........don't care? I CARE.
I started down the energy resource path because you acted like Global Warming isn't a thing. I just published the question, I didn't care about messing with invitations.