Check Out The Article Below & Let There Be No Doubt That A Scheme Is In Place By The Right Wing To Suppress Votes In The November Election.
|
|
|||||
|
61 votes
|
|
80% | ||
|
10 votes
|
|
13% | ||
|
5 votes
|
|
7% | ||
Analysis: 98.4% of voters on Rick Scott's first purge list are eligible voters 
The statistics that we've seen from the first round of Republican Gov.
Rick Scott's Florida voter purge are pretty disturbing. The Miami Herald uncovered the fact
that 58 percent of the people on the initial list sent out to
supervisors to be scrubbed off the voting rolls were Hispanic, even
though they represent just 13 percent of the voting population.
According to the paper's analysis, in addition to Hispanics, Democratic
and independent voters were more likely to be on the list.
That's a really crappy list. It's hard to imagine how many on Scott's secret list
of suspected non-citizens are eligible voters. But if it's consistent
with the failure rate on the smaller sample, it'd be about 177,000.
That's a lot of voters not committing voter fraud.
The statistics that we've seen from the first round of Republican Gov.
Rick Scott's Florida voter purge are pretty disturbing. The Miami Herald uncovered the fact
that 58 percent of the people on the initial list sent out to
supervisors to be scrubbed off the voting rolls were Hispanic, even
though they represent just 13 percent of the voting population.
According to the paper's analysis, in addition to Hispanics, Democratic
and independent voters were more likely to be on the list.
That's bad, but further analysis from ElectionSmith, Inc. makes it even worse.
They've found that 98.4 percent of the 2,625 people included on that
first list as "potential noncitizens" are eligible voters. That's quite
an error rate.
Only 41 registered voters residing in 13 counties–this is
out of the 2,625 names flagged by the Florida SOS as “potential
noncitizens”–were removed from the rolls.In other words, 98.4% of the 2,625 people identified by the Florida
SOS as “potential noncitizens” remain on the rolls because the
Supervisors of Elections found insufficient evidence that they were
ineligible to be registered voters.
That's a really crappy list. It's hard to imagine how many on Scott's secret list
of suspected non-citizens are eligible voters. But if it's consistent
with the failure rate on the smaller sample, it'd be about 177,000.
That's a lot of voters not committing voter fraud.
Originally posted to Joan McCarter on Fri Jun 29, 2012 at 01:42 PM PDT.
http://www.dailykos.com/story/2012/06/29/1104476/-Analysis-98...
you would have to get a real JOB
To those of you who don't seem to understand the article, here is the point!
"98.4% of the 2,625 people identified by the Florida SOS as “potential non-citizens (meaning they are not eligible voters)” but they remain on the register rolls because the Supervisors of Elections found insufficient evidence to prove that these registered voters were really ineligible to vote; Now, they found out that those same 98.4 percent of the 2,625 people including those of the "potential non-citizens (or ineligible voters)" are in fact, ELIGIBLE VOTERS..
So where am I going wrong? Polite assistance welcome. If you get your rocks off being rude, don't say anything.
Your reply is not only rude, it doesn't offer any info. I guess that's because you don't HAVE any -- all you can do is use your computer keys to quote someone else.
Goodnight.
http://www.sodahead.com/unite...
I've seen many questions on SH about why are RW's so hateful and why are LW's so hateful. I've never had a problem with understanding why people would ask why RW's are so hateful, because their hate spills over all the time. BUT I've NEVER understood why anyone accused LW's of being hateful. Until now. I remember your blog -- I looked at it and deleted it without replying because it was disgusting.
Now for a clear idea of what I think of YOUR kind: You're as vile and valueless as any rancid RW. Haters and ranters leave me cold no matter which rock you crawl out from. YOU are the bugs that need exterminating.
I asked a question thinking that a LIBERAL would give me a civil answer. Apparently not, at least not any of your pals -- I certainly won't expect it from you. I see that a couple of my FRIENDS have answered, so I'll ask one of them. Feel free not to butt in.
Oh by the way, I have zero respect for your kind therefore your opinion of anything I write, etc. means nothing, but don't cry over my honest assessment of you just seek help.
My opinon of what you wrote is that it wasn't worth the time it took you to do it. And it certainly wasn't worth my time to read (I didn't read all of it, just enough to get the "flavor" -- it was rotten, like a bad egg).
Your childish attempt to patronize me is noted. You and your little purple pal together will never be good enough to pull that off. But tx for the laugh.
And you think I have a problem?
You're boring.
It still leaves you stinking like a junkyard dog.
I'm trying to find out how I'm misreading it -- it looks clear to me, and at the same time from reading the question it apparently is totally the opposite. So what am I seeing wrong?
If enacted nation-wide there wouldn't be a study to see who belongs and the effective error rate could be as high as this study found.
Maybe Scott wants to purge valid voters, maybe Florida's election commissioners won't let him. Hopefully the watchdogs won't lose track of the issue.
Unfortunately the watchdogs are typically not well funded enough to keep up with the other side.