Check Out The Article Below & Let There Be No Doubt That A Scheme Is In Place By The Right Wing To Suppress Votes In The November Election.
|
|
|||||
|
61 votes
|
|
80% | ||
|
10 votes
|
|
13% | ||
|
5 votes
|
|
7% | ||
Analysis: 98.4% of voters on Rick Scott's first purge list are eligible voters 
The statistics that we've seen from the first round of Republican Gov.
Rick Scott's Florida voter purge are pretty disturbing. The Miami Herald uncovered the fact
that 58 percent of the people on the initial list sent out to
supervisors to be scrubbed off the voting rolls were Hispanic, even
though they represent just 13 percent of the voting population.
According to the paper's analysis, in addition to Hispanics, Democratic
and independent voters were more likely to be on the list.
That's a really crappy list. It's hard to imagine how many on Scott's secret list
of suspected non-citizens are eligible voters. But if it's consistent
with the failure rate on the smaller sample, it'd be about 177,000.
That's a lot of voters not committing voter fraud.
The statistics that we've seen from the first round of Republican Gov.
Rick Scott's Florida voter purge are pretty disturbing. The Miami Herald uncovered the fact
that 58 percent of the people on the initial list sent out to
supervisors to be scrubbed off the voting rolls were Hispanic, even
though they represent just 13 percent of the voting population.
According to the paper's analysis, in addition to Hispanics, Democratic
and independent voters were more likely to be on the list.
That's bad, but further analysis from ElectionSmith, Inc. makes it even worse.
They've found that 98.4 percent of the 2,625 people included on that
first list as "potential noncitizens" are eligible voters. That's quite
an error rate.
Only 41 registered voters residing in 13 counties–this is
out of the 2,625 names flagged by the Florida SOS as “potential
noncitizens”–were removed from the rolls.In other words, 98.4% of the 2,625 people identified by the Florida
SOS as “potential noncitizens” remain on the rolls because the
Supervisors of Elections found insufficient evidence that they were
ineligible to be registered voters.
That's a really crappy list. It's hard to imagine how many on Scott's secret list
of suspected non-citizens are eligible voters. But if it's consistent
with the failure rate on the smaller sample, it'd be about 177,000.
That's a lot of voters not committing voter fraud.
Originally posted to Joan McCarter on Fri Jun 29, 2012 at 01:42 PM PDT.
http://www.dailykos.com/story/2012/06/29/1104476/-Analysis-98...
Too bad Moonbats..
Dirty pool is your game as you well know so the end justifies the means..
http://www.dailykos.com/story...
ROTFLMFBO!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!...
http://www.usnews.com/debate-...
http://www.wtsp.com/news/arti...
http://www.miamiherald.com/20...
For the record, I am all for removing names of the deceased from the voter rolls. The problem is when they have done this in other states, they have screwed it up and tried to remove legit voters from the rolls as well.
Voter ID protects the legal voter. Democrats don't want it so they can cheat with illegal voters.
Florida in 2000. Ohio AND Florida in 2004. I wonder how many states it will be this time? I guess it depends upon how many swing states there are in this election for the GOP/Diebold/Rove to 'swing' through their usual vote-rigging.
Romney will have many, many imaginary friends this November, all voting for him.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?...
It's nothing about stopping illegals from voting. It's not about dead people voting. It's about making sure those who would vote against Romney aren't going to get the equal opportunity to vote that they were getting. Now, they have to prove they are legal voters even though they are already REGISTERED to vote.
Dumb, for Pennsylvania's governor to give it away, but it's nothing I didn't know about all along.
Enjoy your version of reality, but it's not real.
OK. Sorry, but that's the real political agenda at play. He let the cat out of the bag and people cheered for it. It's nothing new to me, but you're still making excuses.
There's nothing wrong with showing your ID when voting I've been doing it for over ten years IN A STATE THAT ALWAYS REQUIRED IT.
If, for some odd reason, I was asked to re-register and get some new ID in order to vote, I'd wonder why and think it was a load of BS. And, rightfully so.
When are people going to wake up that is is not democracy?
even a better solution
heh heh heh