Quantcast

Charlotte’s First Baby of 2012 Sparks Anti-Latino Hate. It’s Time to Drop the I-Word!

Hanna 2012/01/28 23:12:03
http://colorlines.com/archives/2012/01/charlottes_first_baby_...

Earlier this month, the Charlotte Observer published a story about the birth of Tommy Arias, the first baby born in 2012 in Charlotte, North Carolina. The article sparked an outpouring of hate from some readers. How could news of a newborn baby instigate so much outrage?

Here’s what happened. A photo of new mom Lucero Arias, 19, and baby Tommy, was published along with the article, which did not reference Ms. Arias’ immigration status, or national origin. The piece, however, did mention that Tommy’s grandfather called from Mexico City. That was enough for the comments section to fill up with anti-Latino, anti-immigrant rants, causing the Observer to shut down commenting for the article. The paper also added this note: “Comments have been disabled because of repeated violations of site policies. Please refrain from profanity, obscenity, spam, name-calling or attacking others for their views.”

According to Observer readers and Drop the I-Word supporters, the attacks included the derogatory i-word and “anchor baby” slur. Jess George, the Executive Director of The Latin American Coalition, wrote the Observer asking them to Drop the I-Word. They didn’t drop it, but they published the letter, which also sparked hateful reader comments, including these:

” … When kids see lawbreakers get away with their crimes they think they can as well and kids know what illegals are. There IS a difference between Human Rights and US Citizens Rights … “

“Thats right. When an illegal takes a job, he displaces a citizen. When the citizen collects unemployment and goes on food stamps, we pay. This is just one hidden cost of employing illegals.”

“… The way to stop “stereotyping” is to have no illegals here, only legal Latinos. Where could any U.S. citizen sneak over a foreign border and expect a free ride?”

The incomprehensible reaction to the birth of a beautiful Latino baby is precisely why we so value the work of United 4 the Dream (U4TD), the youth group of the Latin American Coalition in Charlotte. We joined them last year in launching a letter-writing campaign asking the Observer to Drop the I-Word, and they followed up with a week of protests in December. They have written the Observer about the baby announcement incident and dropping the term “illegal immigrant” and still there has not been a response.

The incident is worrisome, as Charlotte, the city with the largest Latino population in the state, and host for this year’s Democratic National Convention, has also seen a rise in anti-immigrant, ant-Latino bullying. In a span of two weeks at the end of 2011, at least seven cases of anti-Latino bullying in Charlotte public schools were reported to the Latin American Coalition.

If the hateful reactions don’t illustrate to the Observer and others the racially coded, anti-immigrant, anti-Latino dimension of the i-word, then what will? We know that the i-word is most often used to describe immigrants of color, most often Latino, and especially used to attack Mexican migrants. And the UCLA Chicano Research Center recently released a study on hate speech on the radio in which they found that anti-Latino, anti-immigrant hate speech including the i-word, is tied to political nativism.

The nativist language is sadly also tied to violence and this country’s history of racism. In Long Island in 2008, before Marcelo Lucero was stabbed to death, one of the teens who attacked him said, “‘Hey, fucking nigger; fucking Mexican; fucking illegals, you come to this country to take our money.”

The term “illegal immigrant,” which many journalists are having a hard time giving up, is not too far of a stretch from describing people simply as “illegals,” which the Associated Press, New York Times, and the Observer itself have deemed pejorative. Both terms are dehumanizing and further the concept that a person’s being can be illicit. “Illegal immigrant” is not even legal terminology; the Board of Immigration Appeals does not use it, and neither does the Supreme Court. It’s not constitutional or precise language not only because the term convicts people, denying due process. But also because people are never found by courts to be “illegal.”

Sometimes inaccurate terms are repeated so much that they start sounding normal. It happens all the time. But if it’s established that a term is inaccurate, nativist, rejected by the people it’s used to describe/attack and legally incoherent, how can it be considered professional journalistic language? That is the question facing the Charlotte Observer and journalists at news outlets across the country. The community is asking them to do the right thing.

Charlotte Observer, Drop the I-Word!
You!
Add Photos & Videos

Sort By
  • Most Raves
  • Least Raves
  • Oldest
  • Newest
Opinions

  • luvguins 2012/01/29 00:06:28
    luvguins
    +1
    And these bigots did not even know the status of this mother? Geez, the hatred across this country is getting totally outrageous and depressing.
  • Hanna luvguins 2012/01/29 00:27:32 (edited)
    Hanna
    I posted, on another thread, that it seems for some conservative white Americans, Latinos are the "negroes" of the 21st century. The hatred of Latinos is unbelievable, and you've seen and heard the most hateful language from virtually all the Republican presidential candidates.

    Then, there are numerous right-wing anti-immigrant hate groups, such as FAIR, NumbersUSA, and many of them were founded and funded by John Tanton who is a white supremacist. Today, conservatives aren't shy to express their hatred to the point of killing Latinos or advocating other forms of extreme violence against them.

    As you know, my husband is Latino and the story of his family's journey to the United States is inspiring and proof the American Dream does exist. Their story, and the success they have earned in the U.S., is the reason I advocate for immigrants. I know how they contribute so much to American society and our economy.
  • luvguins Hanna 2012/01/29 00:48:22
    luvguins
    +1
    The right is so misinformed that they think of Latinos as only field migrant workers or dishwashers etc. They do not see them capable as potential professionals like doctors, lawyers, engineers and more. You are correct that the Latinos and Muslims have been made the "negroes" of this century. There always must be a group for bigots to oppress and mistreat. My grandparents met on Ellis Island having migrated from Ireland, and the Irish were horribly treated when they settled in NY in the 1900s.
  • Hanna luvguins 2012/01/29 00:50:45
    Hanna
    They're misinformed, but Gingrich and his ilk know better. He's choosing to pander to the worst racists in America for votes.
  • luvguins Hanna 2012/01/29 01:00:39
    luvguins
    I know. They have to as they know they won't get any sizable number of minorities to vote for them. Newt makes me want to vomit.
  • Hanna luvguins 2012/02/21 00:23:11
    Hanna
    +1
    It's not just Newt; they're all pandering to the racists in America and especially anti-immigrant racists. Combined with the conservative war against women, the only way Republicans can win in November is to suppress the votes of minorities.
  • luvguins Hanna 2012/02/21 00:34:48
    luvguins
    I think they will find all those to be a minority group come November, Hanna.
  • Hanna luvguins 2012/02/21 00:41:12
    Hanna
    +1
    I agree. I sent you a message.
  • Hanna luvguins 2012/02/21 00:42:30
    Hanna
    +1
    Did you read that Santorum is now against prenatal testing?
  • luvguins Hanna 2012/02/21 01:03:35
    luvguins
    Got your message. Yippee. Yes, Santorum is insane.
  • Hanna luvguins 2012/02/21 02:15:29
    Hanna
    +1
    He's insanely anti-women's rights.

See Votes by State

The map above displays the winning answer by region.

News & Politics

2014/09/21 02:07:24

Hot Questions on SodaHead
More Hot Questions

More Community More Originals