Quantcast

CBO says US likely to fall off 'fiscal cliff' if Bush-era tax cuts allowed to expire

Allbiz - PWCM - JLA 2012/05/23 13:22:46

WASHINGTON – A new government study released Tuesday says that allowing Bush-era tax cuts to expire and a scheduled round of automatic spending cuts to take effect would probably throw the economy into a recession.

The Congressional Budget Office report says that the economy would shrink by 1.3 percent in the first half of next year if the government is allowed to fall off this so-called "fiscal cliff" on Jan. 1 -- and that the higher tax rates and more than $100 billion in automatic cuts to the Pentagon and domestic agencies are kept in place.

There's common agreement that lawmakers will act either late this year or early next year to head off the dramatic shift in the government's financial situation. But if they were left in place, CBO says it would wring hundreds of billions of dollars from the budget deficit that would "represent an additional drag on the weak economic expansion."

CBO projected that the economy would contract by 1.3 percent in the first half of 2013, which would meet the traditional definition of a recession, which is when the economy shrinks for two consecutive quarters.

"Such a contraction in output in the first half of 2013 would probably be judged to be a recession," CBO said.

The economy would rebound at a 2.3 percent growth rate in the second half of the year, however, under CBO projections.

At issue is the full expiration of two rounds of major tax cuts enacted during the Bush administration and automatic spending cuts on the Pentagon and domestic programs that are scheduled to take effect as punishment for the failure of last year's deficit "supercommittee" to produce a deficit-cutting agreement last year.

Last summer's debt and budget agreement imposed almost $1 trillion in cuts to agency budgets over the coming decade and required automatic cuts -- dubbed a sequester in Washington-speak -- of another $1 trillion or so over the coming decade.

The CBO study came as Capitol Hill is hopelessly gridlocked over spending and taxes in advance of the fall elections. The White House and top Democrats like Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid of Nevada say they will refuse to act on the expiring tax cuts and automatic spending cuts unless Republicans show greater flexibility on raising taxes.

"If Republicans want to walk away from the bipartisan spending cuts agreed to last August, they will have to work with Democrats to replace them with a balanced deficit reduction package that asks millionaires to pay their fair share," Reid said in a statement.

Republicans are pressing to deal with the problem now. But they're not showing any more flexibility on tax increases.

"You can call this a fiscal cliff. You can call it Taxmageddon as others have done," said Sen. Orrin Hatch, R-Utah. "Whatever you call it, it will be a disaster for the middle class. And it will be a disaster for the small businesses that will be the engine of our economic recovery."

The results of the elections will have a lot to do with the ultimate solution, but several top lawmakers predict the current Congress will punt the issue into 2013 for the newly-elected Congress and whoever occupies the White House to deal with.

"CBO observes that simply extending all of our current tax and spending policies will produce unsustainable deficits and debt, which will also send the economy into decline," said Rep. Chris Van Hollen, D-Md., the top Democrat on the Budget Committee. "We need to act and we must do so in a balanced way."

CBO is the respected nonpartisan agency of Congress that produces economic analysis and estimates of the cost of legislation.



Read more: http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2012/05/22/cbo-says-us-likely...
You!
Add Photos & Videos

Top Opinion

  • gr8punkin 2012/05/23 13:30:08
    gr8punkin
    +3
    I have a friend who is a screaming liberal, and we were talking about politics. He said his least favorite thing that Obama did was to extend the Bush tax cuts, after I explained all of this to him the light went on. He began to understand how trying to over tax the rich actually hurts the poor the most.

Sort By
  • Most Raves
  • Least Raves
  • Oldest
  • Newest
Opinions

  • chaoskitty123 2012/05/23 21:20:30
    chaoskitty123
    +1
    Ok, I don't mean to toss a cold bucket of water on anyone but did you guys actually read the entire topic?

    Quote
    CBO projected that the economy would contract by 1.3 percent in the first half of 2013, which would meet the traditional definition of a recession, which is when the economy shrinks for two consecutive quarters.

    "Such a contraction in output in the first half of 2013 would probably be judged to be a recession," CBO said.

    The economy would rebound at a 2.3 percent growth rate in the second half of the year, however, under CBO projections.
    End Quote

    Basically but, the CBO says it will drop 1.3% in the first half of 2013 but then recover 2.3% in the second half. You cannot report half the story and not make note of the other half because it gives Obama's supporters something to toss back in your face that you overlooked.

    The CBO is basically saying there would be a drop if you removed the Bush tax cuts, but then there would be a recovery larger in the second half of the year than losses in the first half of the year. Your story even gives Obama supporters reasons to promote this by claiming the CBO is nonpartisan.

    When in a recovery, you often see a drop initially in some manner where the economy is concerned but the recovery occurs when you can see what happens ...











    Ok, I don't mean to toss a cold bucket of water on anyone but did you guys actually read the entire topic?

    Quote
    CBO projected that the economy would contract by 1.3 percent in the first half of 2013, which would meet the traditional definition of a recession, which is when the economy shrinks for two consecutive quarters.

    "Such a contraction in output in the first half of 2013 would probably be judged to be a recession," CBO said.

    The economy would rebound at a 2.3 percent growth rate in the second half of the year, however, under CBO projections.
    End Quote

    Basically but, the CBO says it will drop 1.3% in the first half of 2013 but then recover 2.3% in the second half. You cannot report half the story and not make note of the other half because it gives Obama's supporters something to toss back in your face that you overlooked.

    The CBO is basically saying there would be a drop if you removed the Bush tax cuts, but then there would be a recovery larger in the second half of the year than losses in the first half of the year. Your story even gives Obama supporters reasons to promote this by claiming the CBO is nonpartisan.

    When in a recovery, you often see a drop initially in some manner where the economy is concerned but the recovery occurs when you can see what happens after the initial drop... and that's what the CBO is saying, there will essentially be a very brief recession followed by a recovery. This is a huge oversight in the story not mentioned as this is a mix of bad news with extremely good news afterwards.

    Frankly, I don't care what they do as long as it works and both sides work to bring about a recovery instead of each side just trying to beat the other never doing a damn thing because we keep electing career politicians who have no real leadership ability... then we sit back blaming one another when neither side is electing leaders with any real ability to lead beyond conning people out of a vote telling them what they want to hear.

    The economy is a serious issue and all this BS electing leaders to beat the other site instead of leaders who earn the right to lead by proving themselves at the state level through proven accomplishments has got to stop.

    The left blames the right, the right blames the left and everyone forgets the middle which is where most of us actually exist... yet we won't elect leaders who are willing to put together the correct mix to fix what's wrong. One side can't do it on their own because both sides created this mess.

    What did the Republican Congress do that they promised in the last election? Did they repeal Obamacare? Hell no, Obama himself did more to reduce Obamacare by removing a third of it admitting it would cost more... Republicans in Congress haven't done a damn thing since 2010 but state Republicans have been fighting and doing what they promised to do.

    Seems to me that in the next elections we need remove the incumbent Republicans with state Republican leaders who can tell us what they actually accomplished instead of hollow promises of what they will do if re elected and don't do a damn thing they promised to do.

    Maybe vote for more Independents and stop voting for Democrats and Republicans altogether.
    (more)
  • Birthpangs 2012/05/23 15:46:23
  • Kane Fernau 2012/05/23 14:58:55
    Kane Fernau
    +1
    Democrats want to bring this country down
  • Dale 2012/05/23 13:51:41
    Dale
    +1
    Pathetic, pathetic indeed that we have a Congress and Administration that are so filled with themselves that to a person are a waste of perfectly good air. What-in-Hell are they getting paid for? It is certainly not for doing the "People's Business." And why, the bigger question, do we, "We The People", keep voting these do nothing people into Congress and as Top Banana?
  • flaca BN-0 2012/05/23 13:48:16
    flaca BN-0
    +1
    I'm all in favor of keeping them, but unless they are offset by cuts in the military side, they go slap bang on the deficit. You know, that thing Republicans pretend to be most worried about.
  • Allbiz ... flaca BN-0 2012/05/23 14:11:13
    Allbiz - PWCM - JLA
    So while the "new" Russian president has vowed to increase hius military, add new weapons, and develop new invasive technigues, like a good little liberal, you think we should weaken our military so we can just meld right into communism.

    Oh, wait. I apologize. I forgot your country is led by a socialist.
  • Torchmanner ~PWCM~JLA 2012/05/23 13:47:24
    Torchmanner ~PWCM~JLA
    +2
    Sane people know this. Liberals don't have a clue about economics, which is why they caused the mortgage meltdown. They don't realize that someone has to pay for the 'free stuff'. Stealing from job providers puts tax payers out of work.
  • gr8punkin 2012/05/23 13:30:08
    gr8punkin
    +3
    I have a friend who is a screaming liberal, and we were talking about politics. He said his least favorite thing that Obama did was to extend the Bush tax cuts, after I explained all of this to him the light went on. He began to understand how trying to over tax the rich actually hurts the poor the most.
  • Allbiz ... gr8punkin 2012/05/23 13:33:52
    Allbiz - PWCM - JLA
    +2
    Thanks for spreading enlightenment.

News & Politics

2013/06/19 12:13:10

Hot Questions on SodaHead
More Hot Questions

More Community More Originals