Carlos Santana Says Legalize Pot: Do you agree?
Political Pirate
2009/04/10 20:40:46
Rock artist, Carlos Santana, told CNN that Obama should legalize pot, and give the money to teachers in schools. Santana is known for 3 things: his amazing music, his love for making life fun and helping others. Well, I guess you can say that wanting Obama to legalize marijuana, and decriminalize it, could go under helping others. Santana's whole deal is that smoking weed is so insignificant compared to other things happening in life... that reinvesting money gained by marijuana sales could help the economy. Give the pot money to teachers, schools and teachers, who need it, to maintain better education.
Do you agree with Santana's idea to legalize pot?
Do you agree with Santana's idea to legalize pot?
Top Opinion
-
Tea in the Harbor 2009/04/12 16:29:56Yes, Santana has it right. Legalize Marijuana and donate money to schools.+4Prohibition of pot, like alcohol before it, has created a huge market for organized crime. Empowering criminal activity is just plain stupid.






















They did it with liquor and it brings in a lot of tax revenue.
It's the big drug Co's that have no way to govern it so they can make millions. So they lobby for it to stay an illegal substance.
I say if it stays illegal that they should make liquor and tobacco illegal too.
Just my opinion.
I can see both sides of thr argument for pot. but even considering to legalize heroin, cocaine etc is just plain idiotic.
Alcohol is of course, bad for you. I think everyone will agree on this at least.. In moderation it is not as bad as it is in quantity, but it is never good. One of the main features of any pro-pot argument is that marijuana is not as bad as alcohol. So what? Not being "as bad" does not make it good. Pot is like alcohol in a few of its nasty side effects. It makes you have less control of your body. It makes you less aware of your surroundings. Over time it causes memory loss. Just like booze. The medical uses of cannabis are inhibited by the problem that the THC content of marijuana varies greatly, and scientists have been unable to develop a strain of the plant in which it is constant.
As I see it medical uses, and all other arguments are not part of the issue. I'd have no issue if someone wanted to make it legal nationwide strictly for health care reasons. there is some merit to that.
There is also some merit to it being used as a fiber as it has a fairly high tensile strength But a vast majority of the individuals promoting marijuana legalization are not interested in any of that, they are interested in smoking pot for recreation.
* FDR, understood what people were realistically demanding and came down on their side. Roosevelt fought for the true “Joe 6-packs“(“the wets”) in his presidential campaign, leaving Hoover to drown with “the dries.” President Obama…the time is now!
Something to consider:
*** President Obama should follow the New Deal-era precedent of reigning in the Moral Majority, Banking scoundrels, and “Do Nothing” Republicans of its day. The Anti-Saloon League (a fundamentalist group) also pushed anti-evolution legislation (the Scopes “monkey trial” was in 1925) as vehemently as it did its war on booze. Like today, the political standing of this crowd crashed along with the stock market.
* FDR, understood what people were realistically demanding and came down on their side. Roosevelt fought for the true “Joe 6-packs“(“the wets”) in his presidential campaign, leaving Hoover to drown with “the dries.” President Obama…the time is now!
* It is refreshing to find others that realize most choices are not a 'zero-sum' game.
"If cannabis were unknown and bioprospectors were suddenly to find it in some remote mountain crevice, its discovery would not doubt be hailed as a medical breakthrough.Scientists would praise its potential for treating everything from pain to cancer, and marvel at its rich pharmacopeia many of whose chemicals mimic vital molecules in the human body." : The Economist, April 27,2006
"Overall, by comparison with other drugs used mainly for "recreational" purposes, cannabis could be rated to be a relatively safe drug... In contrast, cannabis might have beneficial effects in some medical indications... It seems likely that medical cannabis will re-enter the pharmacopeia": Leslie Iversen, pharmacologist at Oxford University and member of the British government's Advisory Council on the Misuse of Drugs, "Long-term effects of exposure to cannabis," Current Opinion in Pharmacology,2005
PS. Damn, I'm already "mary-ed" lmao
BadeeBaDeeBaDee, thats all folks!
Anyone can come up with excuses for doing durgs. What a horrible example this would set for our children. Take a look at the video on Stupid Americans and you'll see why the drug problem only adds to our character decline around the world.
"If cannabis were unknown and bioprospectors were suddenly to find it in some remote mountain crevice, its discovery would not doubt be hailed as a medical breakthrough.Scientists would praise its potential for treating everything from pain to cancer, and marvel at its rich pharmacopeia many of whose chemicals mimic vital molecules in the human body." : The Economist, April 27,2006
"Overall, by comparison with other drugs used mainly for "recreational" purposes, cannabis could be rated to be a relatively safe drug... In contrast, cannabis might have beneficial effects in some medical indications... It seems likely that medical cannabis will re-enter the pharmacopeia": Leslie Iversen, pharmacologist at Oxford University and member of the British government's Advisory Council on the Misuse of Drugs, "Long-term effects of exposure to cannabis," Current Opinion in Pharmacology,2005
"If cannabis were unknown and bioprospectors were suddenly to find it in some remote mountain crevice, its discovery would not doubt be hailed as a medical breakthrough.Scientists would praise its potential for treating everything from pain to cancer, and marvel at its rich pharmacopeia many of whose chemicals mimic vital molecules in the human body." : The Economist, April 27,2006
"Overall, by comparison with other drugs used mainly for "recreational" purposes, cannabis could be rated to be a relatively safe drug... In contrast, cannabis might have beneficial effects in some medical indications... It seems likely that medical cannabis will re-enter the pharmacopeia": Leslie Iversen, pharmacologist at Oxford University and member of the British government's Advisory Council on the Misuse of Drugs, "Long-term effects of exposure to cannabis," Current Opinion in Pharmacology,2005
Also, what does that say about us? Everyone does it anyway, so let's legalize it? Where are standards? Let's say pot is legalized. Some guy is happily smoking while driving... That's great. I don't need to finish that one.
Or, what if it was only allowed at home? Another average Joe is sitting at home, enjoying his weed. He starts imagining things, and, I don't know, starts a fire or something similar. Or runs out into the street, gets hit by a guy in a car. Sounds like great fun.
Maybe we should legalize it; it would get rid of the idiots that think it's a good idea.