Canadian Talk Show Host Destroys Obama Over Keystone Decision. Do you agree with him?
safari
2012/03/09 19:36:38
|
|
|||||
|
13 votes
|
|
17% | ||
|
3 votes
|
|
4% | ||
|
9 votes
|
|
12% | ||
|
45 votes
|
|
58% | ||
|
8 votes
|
|
10% | ||
This is a must see! Ezra Levant of The Source, a Sun News show, has really done his homework and profound research on obama's energy promises versus his idiotic actions since he made them. Be sure to watch it in whole and pay attention to the map of the alleged "pristine" environmentally sensitive area through which it would pass. Even the EPA has given the project the green light. obama is NOT acting in the best interest of America with his halting of the Keystone Pipeline and his true loyalties are exposed.
Read More: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=UKYX9kEDkUY
Top Opinion
-
Allbiz - PWCM - JLA 2012/03/09 19:50:07All of the above
+12Of course Egobama is not acting in the best interest of America. He is acting in the best interest of Soros,, Buffet, Zuckerberg, and many other of his big supporters who stand to be the big financial winners as long as Keystone XL is denied.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?...
http://www.afa.net/Detail.asp...
Unfortunately, neither party seems to be very interested in serving America's best interests.
If it's good for America, 0bama is against it. If it's bad for America, 0bama is for it.
It doesn't matter whether the Canadians have our best interests as their primary motivation or not. We should at least have that as OUR motivation.
"SCIENTIFIC BASIS
Adam Brandt, acting assistant professor in the department of Energy Resources Engineering at Stanford University, California, is among those who have found tar sands to be highly polluting.
There are uncertainties, he said, but available evidence suggested that on a "wells-to-wheels" basis, oil sands have about 15-20 percent higher greenhouse gas emissions than conventional oil, because of the extra energy used in extraction.
Brandt helped the EU come up with its 107 grams per megajoule ranking. He told Reuters the range of emissions from oil sands projects in general ranged from the low 100s to more than 120 megajoules, depending on the project. On that basis, 107 was "a reasonable and realistic default value for the industry average," he said.
The oil industry has cited other research, which finds oil sands are comparable with other heavy crudes in terms of their life-cycle carbon emissions, especially those whose production is accompanied by the flaring of associated gas.
(Reporting by Barbara Lewis in Brussels, Jeff Jones in Calgary)"
Additionally, Venezuala is also a "unconventional" source of crude, but you don't seem to be adverse to Obama making the decision...
"SCIENTIFIC BASIS
Adam Brandt, acting assistant professor in the department of Energy Resources Engineering at Stanford University, California, is among those who have found tar sands to be highly polluting.
There are uncertainties, he said, but available evidence suggested that on a "wells-to-wheels" basis, oil sands have about 15-20 percent higher greenhouse gas emissions than conventional oil, because of the extra energy used in extraction.
Brandt helped the EU come up with its 107 grams per megajoule ranking. He told Reuters the range of emissions from oil sands projects in general ranged from the low 100s to more than 120 megajoules, depending on the project. On that basis, 107 was "a reasonable and realistic default value for the industry average," he said.
The oil industry has cited other research, which finds oil sands are comparable with other heavy crudes in terms of their life-cycle carbon emissions, especially those whose production is accompanied by the flaring of associated gas.
(Reporting by Barbara Lewis in Brussels, Jeff Jones in Calgary)"
Additionally, Venezuala is also a "unconventional" source of crude, but you don't seem to be adverse to Obama making the decision to continue with that source. In reality, the 107 m value would have been reduced by the Keystone Pipline.
It appears that you are much more subjective in your analysis than you could ever support.
http://www.wallbuilders.com/L...