Can Disney Fight Obesity by Banning Junk Food Ads?
SodaHead TV
2012/06/05 22:00:00
|
|
|||||
|
269 votes
|
|
38% | |||
|
437 votes
|
|
62% | |||
Instead of waiting for the government to start banning junk food ads after the watershed, as it's already done in the U.K., Disney has decided to take on that responsibility itself. The multinational company announced that by 2015, it will require all food and beverage companies that advertise on its children's programming (Disney Channel, Disney XD, Disney Junior, Radio Disney, Disney.com) to meet certain nutrition standards.
Disney CEO Robert Iger said in a statement, "Parents can be confident that foods associated with Disney characters or advertised on Disney platforms meet our new, healthier nutrition guideline." According to USA Today, the company's standards will reflect government regulations. Health-focused consumer groups are calling it a "landmark" because a private company is preemptively regulating itself. Do you think Disney can fight obesity by banning junk food ads on its medium?

Disney CEO Robert Iger said in a statement, "Parents can be confident that foods associated with Disney characters or advertised on Disney platforms meet our new, healthier nutrition guideline." According to USA Today, the company's standards will reflect government regulations. Health-focused consumer groups are calling it a "landmark" because a private company is preemptively regulating itself. Do you think Disney can fight obesity by banning junk food ads on its medium?

Top Opinion
-
RoyJLores 2012/06/05 22:56:02No




















(To be honest, my problem with the issue started when Ontario stopped letting schools provide anything that doesn't "meet their nutritional standards"... now the cafeteria food tastes like crap, teachers have to bring in vegetable trays if a class has a potluck, and they have to sell vegetarian hot dogs at the BBQ. And, somehow, the cafeteria still sells fries, cookies that taste like mayonnaise and marshmallows, burgers, chocolate milk, brownies, "healthier alternative" chips... I'll admit, the chicken is better, though.)
Good point, I reckon ;0 )
In most cases that is, anyway...
Good for them for 'quality control'
related to thier image, and concerns
for the sake and well being of children,
as well as adults, aka, kids at heart, alike...
I'm guessing they are also taking measures,
within thier theme parks as well ? Or are they ?
Some have direct responsibilty, parents, manufacturers and educators
Whilst others may have an indirect responsibilty; marketeers, School lunch suppliers etc.
Is it right to do nothing if you know that by making a small change you are no longer "enabling" a child to be unhealthy?