Quantcast

Can Apes Outthink Humans?

SodaHead News 2012/06/25 13:00:00
You!
Add Photos & Videos
According to The Associated Press, scientists have discovered that the DNA of a bonobo ape is only about 1.3 percent different from humans. And ape behavior continues to astonish scientists as they demonstrate thinking processes and capabilities we never thought possible. For instance, one study showed bonobos will "pack" the tools they need to access food if they're moving to a remote location for the night, and remember to take them with the next day.

Another study showed that if one chimpanzee can see a piece of food and another cannot, the chimp that can see the food is able to recognize this advantage and keep the food hidden -- in other words, chimps are able to put themselves in another's shoes. Another study tried to determine how many pictures baboons could memorize over the course of three years, and by the end of the study, they could remember the pictures better than the scientists testing them.

Emory University primatologist Frans de Waal told AP, "Capacities that we think in humans are very special and complex are probably not so special and not so complex. This research in animals elevates the animals, but it also brings down the humans... If monkeys can do it and maybe dogs and other animals, maybe it's not as complex as you think." Do you think apes have the brainpower to outthink humans?

bonobo thinking
Add a comment above

Top Opinion

Sort By
  • Most Raves
  • Least Raves
  • Oldest
  • Newest
Opinions

  • Brad # 2486547 2012/06/26 12:14:14
    Yes
    Brad # 2486547
    +2
    They can out think liberals.
  • the fuze 2012/06/26 11:42:20
    Yes
    the fuze
    +2
    I saw this documentary on it once... in the end the apes won.
    planet if the apes

    planet if the apes
  • Willski 2012/06/26 10:31:40
    Yes
    Willski
    +2
    In the right situations, with the right apes and people, yeah.
    It's happened in the past.
  • Birthpangs Willski 2012/06/26 12:04:27
  • Willski Birthpangs 2012/06/26 14:12:47
    Willski
    +2
    i watched some documentaries about studying apes. i can't remember which... but the puzzles they make to test ape intelligence, the apes are better at some of them than humans.
  • Birthpangs Willski 2012/06/27 12:22:13
  • Willski Birthpangs 2012/06/27 12:52:10
    Willski
    +1
    that the apes win in a test of intellect. Thus they have been known to outthink us.
  • Birthpangs Willski 2012/06/27 17:11:49
  • Willski Birthpangs 2012/06/27 18:26:25
    Willski
    +1
    So, why are you so opposed to the idea of other animals competing with us intellectually?
  • Birthpangs Willski 2012/06/27 21:02:22
  • Willski Birthpangs 2012/06/27 22:33:40
    Willski
    +1
    No, i'm above average for a human. But you've rather crudely dodged my question. Would you care to answer it?
    Oh, and for simplicity any more question dodging, or the like will be considered an admission of fault.
    And incase you're incapable of scrolling up, the question was/is:
    "why are you so opposed to the idea of other animals competing with us intellectually?"
  • Birthpangs Willski 2012/06/27 22:46:51
  • Willski Birthpangs 2012/06/27 22:49:56
    Willski
    +1
    So you're dodging the question, which by the way isn't stupid. But dodging it is.
    Seeing as you obviously have no defense/support for your viewpoint with me as the de facto victor.
    (Not that winning a debate of this sort is traditionally possible, but in this instance I'm claiming victory due to a total lack of opposition.)
  • Birthpangs Willski 2012/06/27 23:00:39
  • Willski Birthpangs 2012/06/27 23:03:43 (edited)
    Willski
    +1
    Good to hear. I like winning, it feels nice.

    EDIT: Oh look, i got blocked, with Ad hominem.
  • Birthpangs Willski 2012/06/27 23:05:24
  • JoshuaHarper 2012/06/26 10:20:35
    Yes
    JoshuaHarper
    I'm sure they have less distractions to think about.
  • Rusty Bubbles 2012/06/26 09:50:54
    No
    Rusty Bubbles
    +6
    Not yet, ~~~

  • Butterb... Rusty B... 2012/06/27 07:39:34
    ButterbeerMe
    +1
    People do that too, haha.
  • dvd 2012/06/26 09:22:18
  • Birthpangs dvd 2012/06/26 12:05:31
  • Vitalani Birthpangs 2012/06/26 13:29:37
    Vitalani
    +3
    You think scientists are doing this so that they can prove god doesn't exist? Did it ever occur to you that if they don't believe in god, they don't care what you think or believe in? The purpose of science has nothing I do with proving anything about "god". It may be used that way, but in this situation, it isn't.
  • Wortmore Vitalani 2012/06/26 15:46:59
    Wortmore
    +1
    Science is the study of nature, not religious
  • Vitalani Wortmore 2012/06/26 15:48:10
    Vitalani
    +2
    That's...what I was saying....??
  • Birthpangs Vitalani 2012/06/27 12:25:54
  • Vitalani Birthpangs 2012/06/27 22:47:36
    Vitalani
    And? Many religious people spend there entire lives attempting to disprove science! More so than scientists. Science in itself does not exist to disprove creation, don't flatter yourself.
  • Birthpangs Vitalani 2012/06/27 22:52:33
  • Vitalani Birthpangs 2012/06/27 23:12:36
    Vitalani
    Junk science as in....evolution, carbon dating, archaeological digs, geography, carbon colliders, and DNA mapping?

    I'm sorry, but I see far more religious people attempting to disprove science than the other way around. Every bible school teacher, every preacher, and every nun has taught something that goes against science...It's called creationism.
  • Birthpangs Vitalani 2012/06/27 23:21:26
  • Vitalani Birthpangs 2012/06/27 23:31:06
    Vitalani
    Yes, stories certainly do spread quickly. However just because there may have been a flood, doesn't mean there is a magical man living in the sky.

    Of course archaeological digs are still funded, and many have nothing to do with the bible. (CADW. ELDVTS). Carbon dating may not be perfect however it still gives a good time frame. And the bible, in my opinion, has far many more holes and inaccuracies than evolution. You can act like since you're a "scientist" you know what you are talking about when it comes to this, but in all actuality the line of work you are in hasn't a thing to do with any of it. Let's not get started on simplistic garbage, but nice attempt to bring this conversation down to your level.
  • Birthpangs Vitalani 2012/06/27 23:33:45
  • Grandbr... dvd 2012/06/26 14:16:15
    Grandbrother
    +1
    Humans are animals too. Nothing about that "drags us down". It's just a simple acknowledgment of reality.
  • dvd Grandbr... 2012/06/26 18:43:16
  • Grandbr... dvd 2012/06/27 03:22:32
    Grandbrother
    +2
    What led you to be in such wild denial of the most basic science?

    How old do you think the earth is?

    What are your thoughts on dinosaurs?

    Dare I ask about evolution?
  • dvd Grandbr... 2012/06/27 04:55:25
  • Grandbr... dvd 2012/06/27 06:11:04
    Grandbrother
    +2
    Yes, it is a denial of basic science. Homo Sapiens (humans) are scientifically classified as a member of the animal kingdom, in the order of primates. This is grade school science class material. See the following link for a clear explanation and breakdown of the scientific classification of humans. http://www.learner.org/course...

    And what matters to me is that so many in contemporary American society have so sharply and willfully turned towards a rejection of hard-earned scientific knowledge. It makes no sense whatsoever to deny what we've learned, and doing so threatens the positive growth of our society.
  • dvd Grandbr... 2012/06/27 18:54:22
  • Grandbr... dvd 2012/06/28 13:48:08
    Grandbrother
    You may choose to reject the basic science, but that doesn't change the fact that it IS basic science.

    And there's nothing about acknowledging humans as animals that debases us - not unless you wildly undervalue the incredible complexity and majesty of the entire animal kingdom and life in general. Frankly, learnng what we know about our universe and everything in it has been a fascinating and exhilerating endeavor for me and most who undertake it. It's unfortunate that you would think something about it is inherently depressing.

    The real reason I keep coming back to this topic is both 1) you keep replying and 2) I enjoy sharing fact-based knowledge.

    What's interesting is that when someone makes accusatory assumptions about another person, those assumptions tend to be a reflection of the accuser's own state of mind or behavioral tendencies. So when you erroneously assume that I'm here because of either "1) ARROGANCE or 2) U want someone to convince you of the truth because something inside of you is searching", it really tells me a lot about you.
  • dvd Grandbr... 2012/06/29 04:34:26
  • Grandbr... dvd 2012/06/29 11:20:03
    Grandbrother
    You said: "You chose to attempt to challenge me, for some reaon, over this....which makes no sense"

    It makes perfect sense. This is a discussion forum. That's how it works. You write stuff and people respond. You didn't know this when you joined Sodahead?

    What's REALLY strange is how some people think that acknowledging what homo sapiens are is somehow inherently degrading.

See Votes by State

The map above displays the winning answer by region.

News & Politics

2013/05/20 02:21:40

Hot Questions on SodaHead
More Hot Questions

More Community More Originals