Quantcast

Can anyone tell me where the second amendment mentions hunting deer?

Steve 2013/01/17 12:46:20
He is right.
He doesn't have a clue.
Undecided
You!
Add Photos & Videos

"no one hunts with an assault rifle"
"No one needs ten bullets to kill a deer."
Cuomo Goes Hunting For Straw Men
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fg0lfi_ZQiU&feature;=player_em...


Let me clarify it for you Mr. Cuomo:

As passed by the Congress:



A well regulated Militia, being necessary to the
security of a free State, the right of the people to keep and bear Arms,
shall not be infringed.


As ratified by the States and authenticated by Thomas Jefferson, Secretary of State:



A well regulated militia being necessary to the
security of a free state, the right of the people to keep and bear arms
shall not be infringed.

There is nothing there that mentions hunting or killing deer. Nor is there anything that mentions that they should be regulated as to how armed they can be........

People should not be allowed to be in office that cant grasp a simple concept like this one. How can they swear to protect a document that they can't comprehend?

We the people need to start removing these "false representatives" from office. How do we do this is by voting them out one by one. People need to pay attention to what is happening or else we are going to loose the greatest nation in the history of this world!


Read More: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fg0lfi_ZQiU&feature...

Add a comment above

Top Opinion

Sort By
  • Most Raves
  • Least Raves
  • Oldest
  • Newest
Opinions

  • kim B. 2013/01/23 08:39:42
    He doesn't have a clue.
    kim B.
    deer.........how about politicans?
  • S and S 2013/01/18 12:34:17
  • ronbo51 2013/01/18 02:24:48 (edited)
    He doesn't have a clue.
    ronbo51
    +3
    i smell tar and feathers getting ready for washington DC!!!!!! i am the nra and i vote

    WTF!!!
    does anyone believe thats all thats out there? just deer in the woods????
    you need to protect yourself while hunting.
  • lm1b2 2013/01/17 23:23:29
    He doesn't have a clue.
    lm1b2
    +2
    I have seen a lot of Hunters who need 10 bullets to kill a deer,some need more Amigo!
  • Andrew 2013/01/17 22:30:18
    He doesn't have a clue.
    Andrew
    +5
    Barack Obama and the Progressives are seeking to further pervert the interpretatio of the Second Amendment! Cuomo is a chip off the old block, but I'll guarantee , he has access to all the firepower he needs to defend what is his! So should we> I have guns to kill deer. I also have guns that serve other purposes, namely to defend my home against invaders, whoever they may be!
  • BULLDOGBlacksmith 2013/01/17 21:15:48
    He doesn't have a clue.
    BULLDOGBlacksmith
  • JCD aka "biz" 2013/01/17 20:48:21
    Undecided
    JCD aka "biz"
    Does the second amendment also mention the tactical nuclear recoilless gun, aka David Crockett Weapon System? If it doesn't, how come you can't buy one at your nearest Walmart store?
  • Steve JCD aka... 2013/01/18 14:44:58
    Steve
    +3
    If a revolution started in this country the people will own them as well. No country will use nukes on themselves to win a war. They can't even use them on each other. Do you know why? Because when someone owns a weapon that is equal or greater than the aggressor, the aggressor will not attempt to attack.
  • DeeB 2013/01/17 19:49:19 (edited)
    He is right.
    DeeB
    +3
    It doesn't. It was put together so the people could defend their selves against the tyrannical government which we now have. I don't care if a million people kill another million people, they have no right to take any guns from the people, NONE. If they want to take someones guns so bad they need to take the ones from the military so they can no longer go around the world killing the innocent. We are paying for Offense not Defense. When have they ever used Defense? Not even for 9/11 remember????
    EDIT
    Obviously I clicked on the wrong one!
  • SIMPATTYCO 2013/01/17 19:20:53
    Undecided
    SIMPATTYCO
    +2
    Correct It's for a militia to protect the people from a rogue,runaway government.
  • Buck 2013/01/17 19:09:14
    He doesn't have a clue.
    Buck
    +5
    It`s gonna be a show watckin him get them guns away from the chicago and detroit gangsters
  • AM 2013/01/17 18:55:50
  • Frank Stephens 2013/01/17 17:28:50
    Undecided
    Frank Stephens
    +8
    Not really undecided, but just left speechless by the
    1. ignorance of this president
    2. deceitfulness of this president
    3. evil agenda that he has yet to explain to this nation
    4. or just maybe we can explain it as brain dead leftist-progressives that can't think logically about any problem facing this nation.
  • anthony... Frank S... 2013/01/17 18:05:44
    anthony.teramino
    +4
    Well deal with it for the next 4 years xD
  • Kronan_1 2013/01/17 17:12:12
    He doesn't have a clue.
    Kronan_1
    +8
    Maybe these people need to watch Red Dawn and remember why we have NOT been invaded by froeign powers yet. Take away our defense network and it will leave us wide open for attack on AMERICAN soil. They should also be reminded that during WWII the Japanese didn't invede the US because the AMERICAN people had too many PERSONAL GUNS AND AMMO.

    Red Dawn Red Dawn
  • Mehuldera 2013/01/17 16:58:45
    He doesn't have a clue.
    Mehuldera
    +9
    We don't own a gun of any type and have no desire to own one now but this gun law stuff makes me angry. Why do these people not undetrstand that any person intent on harming themselves or someone else will find a way to do that. If not with a gun as in Littleton, CO, Aurora, CO or Newtown, CT then with a knife as happenened in China about the same time as the Sandy Hook tragedy, or a bomb as happened in Oklahoma City, or by poison as when anthrax was mailed to members of congress. You can't legislate crazy people sane and taking guns away from sane law abiding citizens only gives those crazy people, who obtain their guns illegally, the upper hand. How many of these massacres were accomplished with a gun or guns legally obtained by the murders?
  • Kronan_1 Mehuldera 2013/01/17 17:17:53
    Kronan_1
    +8
    Congratulations . You understand the 2nd amendment gives you the right to own a weapon but, doesn't make it a demand. You have recognized it also gives you the right to NOT own a weapon if you so CHOOSE. Freedom. The right to make your own choice. IQ Award
  • Mehuldera Kronan_1 2013/01/17 19:27:46
    Mehuldera
    +3
    EXACTLY!!!!
  • Todd Parsons 2013/01/17 16:04:36
    He doesn't have a clue.
    Todd Parsons
    +8
    What are of "Shall not be infringed" didn't he understand....besides the "infringed" part
  • Birthpangs 2013/01/17 15:43:33
  • kudabux Birthpangs 2013/01/17 19:08:53
    kudabux
    +1
    Anybody who kills a defenseless animal is a neanderthal. IMHO The supermarket has all the food you need. neanderthal
  • Birthpangs kudabux 2013/01/17 19:13:40
  • Amasaman kudabux 2013/01/17 19:19:35
    Amasaman
    +6
    The supermarket has low protein, high fat, factory farmed, steroid injected meat that could have been mishandled or contaminated during processing.

    The deer I shoot, process and eat is much, much healthier than that.

    And besides, just what do you think ends up in the supermarket? Yep, defenseless animals, born and bred to be slaughtered. At least a game animal has the freedom to live in the wild, with a better chance to escape than a cow.
  • Steve kudabux 2013/01/17 19:53:16
    Steve
    +3
    Have you ever been to a slaughter house? That's where all the supermarket meat comes from. I guess the neanderthals are giving you a guilt free meal.
  • kudabux Steve 2013/01/17 19:57:35
    kudabux
    As a matter of fact, as a child, I used to watch the Rabbi's in the slaughterhouse slaughter the cows with a mallet to the forehead. (Kids are tough.) And I have seen chickens with their throats slit, bleeding out in a basket. As I matured, I got a heart.
  • JP kudabux 2013/01/18 01:03:27
    JP
    +1
    And lost your brain?
  • JP kudabux 2013/01/18 01:02:38
  • kudabux JP 2013/01/18 15:00:38 (edited)
    kudabux
    You mean like 'thinning the herd'? Somebody ought to thin your herd
  • Birthpangs kudabux 2013/01/18 16:35:58
  • kudabux Birthpangs 2013/01/18 20:13:38
    kudabux
    No I love seeing them blasted so smithereens (sarcasm) love blasted smithereens sarcasm sarah palin hunting wolves
  • Birthpangs kudabux 2013/01/19 05:27:31
  • JP kudabux 2013/01/18 17:21:34
    JP
    +2
    It's called management and it's obviously to complex for you to understand!
  • phil.olding.3 2013/01/17 15:43:24
    He is right.
    phil.olding.3
    +3
    Your question was extremely unclear and the answers didn't match the question.

    The right of the people, to keep and bear (that's possess, carry and use) arms (that's weapons for killing people) shall not be infringed.

    This right exists because a well-regulated militia (that's well trained, well armed, well disciplined militia) is necessary to the security of a free state.

    The militia has no rights. The people have rights.

    The right of the people to possess, carry, and use, weapons for killing people, shall not be infringed, because it is necessary to maintaining security and freedom in the United States.

    Maintaining the security of a free state with 7-round fixed magazines is not possible.

    Weapons for killing people - assault weapons - are the only kind that are protected by the bill of rights.

    If your gun cannot kill people, then it is not protected by the 2nd amendment.
  • Beverly 2013/01/17 15:25:52
    He doesn't have a clue.
    Beverly
    +5
    Obama HATES the Consitution and is supported by enough Congressmen and Senators that also hate it to destroy everything it stands for one step at a time. But, as long as the foolish who still believe in Santa Claus get to be freeloaders off the ones silly enough to have the ethics and character to work and pay taxes we will not get rid of the Communists in charge.
  • Willy 2013/01/17 15:11:06
    He doesn't have a clue.
    Willy
    +7
    Yes it makes me cringe when someone make an asinine statement like that, especially an elected politician. Hunting and self defense is not what the 2nd amendment is about. They are just two of the side benefits.
  • Amasaman 2013/01/17 15:09:31 (edited)
    He doesn't have a clue.
    Amasaman
    +6
    Does anybody in New York "feel" safer now?
    beretta
  • phil.ol... Amasaman 2013/01/17 17:32:19 (edited)
    phil.olding.3
    +5
    No. No one does.

    Wait, I take that back - maybe criminals do!
  • john.newell.771 2013/01/17 14:58:54
    He doesn't have a clue.
    john.newell.771
    +2
    He is talking about "dear" leader.
  • Cliff 2013/01/17 14:58:31 (edited)
    He doesn't have a clue.
    Cliff
    +6
    If Cuomo wants to know where the US Constitution mentions hunting deer, he should look at the "promote the general welfare" clause of the preamble. Liberals find all kinds of neat stuff in there so maybe he'll find deer hunting as well.
  • Dave**Gay for Girls** 2013/01/17 14:52:03

See Votes by State

The map above displays the winning answer by region.

News & Politics

2014/08/23 01:46:32

Hot Questions on SodaHead
More Hot Questions

More Community More Originals