Can a Child Be a 'Psychopath'?
SodaHead News
2012/05/15 13:00:00
|
|
|||||
|
776 votes
|
|
94% | |||
|
50 votes
|
|
6% | |||
When the parents of 9-year-old Michael took their son to a Florida researcher for help with his behavioral problems, they couldn't have expected the diagnosis he received. For six years, they'd gone through "A.D.D.," "depression," "O.C.D.," you name it, but when Dan Waschbusch examined Michael's behavior -- sudden shifts from violent agression to "calculated charm" -- he picked the word "psychopath."
The most striking thing about Michael's behavior is his ability to mask his dark side with calm, intelligent conversation -- something that isn't common in 9-year-olds. Psychologist Mark Dadds explains, "No one is comfortable labeling a 5-year-old a psychopath, [but] the research showing that this temperament exists and can be identified in young children is quite strong." But should a kid ever be labeled a "psychopath"?

The most striking thing about Michael's behavior is his ability to mask his dark side with calm, intelligent conversation -- something that isn't common in 9-year-olds. Psychologist Mark Dadds explains, "No one is comfortable labeling a 5-year-old a psychopath, [but] the research showing that this temperament exists and can be identified in young children is quite strong." But should a kid ever be labeled a "psychopath"?

Top Opinion
-
JanHopkins 2012/05/15 14:18:33Yes+15Yeah. Some kids are born that way and the sooner it is diagnosed the sooner measures can be taken to insure it doesn't get out of control.





















Technically they can't label the child as a psychopath until they reach 18, but the DSMIVR gives the label oppositional/defiant..
calculated charm is a trait of an anti-social personality disorder, hell half of Congress and the president are that. He'll probably be the next John Edwards.
That being said, I'm wondering if diagnosing someone as a one when they are a kid might cause more harm than good- as some non-psychopaths will be mislabeled, and a true psychopath may be sharp enough to trick people into thinking he's normal.
"These eyes will deceive you. They will destroy you. They will take from you, your innocence... your pride... and eventually your soul. These eyes do not see what you and I see. Behind these eyes, one finds only blackness. The absence of light. These are the eyes of a psychopath."
Should we judge a person's behavior based on the fact that they are born that way? The homosexual community says we should not, and they strongly argue that homosexuals are born that way. So, why should we inhibit one behavior but not another?
Ultimately, the child will do what he intends to do. We can try to influence that decision, but we are more likely only able to inhibit his actions.
I'm also absolutely sick of corporate executives. We don't need people who only look for what they can exploit out of their own country, treating employees as expendable furniture.
Look at the people who tortured the inmates at Guantanamo. A lot of policemen are nothing but sociopaths who have harnessed their ways into useful service to society.
Better to deal with the problem and hope that they can "harness their ways into useful service to society."
Bayer is a well-known psychologist who provides therapy to Wall Street traders.
The type of psychopath the author is writing about is characterized by compulsive gambling. And the Wall Street psychopath doesn’t necessarily show up to his or her first day of work in this condition. From the article:
These “financial psychopaths” generally lack empathy and interest in what other people feel or think. At the same time, they display an abundance of charm, charisma, intelligence, credentials, an unparalleled capacity for lying, fabrication, and manipulation, and a drive for thrill seeking.
A financial psychopath can present as a perfect well-rounded job candidate, CEO, manager, co-worker, and team member because their destructive characteristics are practically invisible. They flourish in fast-paced industries and are experts in taking advantage of company systems and processes as well as exploiting communication weaknesses and promoting interpersonal conflicts.
But before you do that, please explain exactly, what a "psychopath" is and show us the scientific evidence that supports the "concept"