Can a Child Be a 'Psychopath'?
SodaHead News
2012/05/15 13:00:00
|
|
|||||
|
776 votes
|
|
94% | |||
|
50 votes
|
|
6% | |||
When the parents of 9-year-old Michael took their son to a Florida researcher for help with his behavioral problems, they couldn't have expected the diagnosis he received. For six years, they'd gone through "A.D.D.," "depression," "O.C.D.," you name it, but when Dan Waschbusch examined Michael's behavior -- sudden shifts from violent agression to "calculated charm" -- he picked the word "psychopath."
The most striking thing about Michael's behavior is his ability to mask his dark side with calm, intelligent conversation -- something that isn't common in 9-year-olds. Psychologist Mark Dadds explains, "No one is comfortable labeling a 5-year-old a psychopath, [but] the research showing that this temperament exists and can be identified in young children is quite strong." But should a kid ever be labeled a "psychopath"?

The most striking thing about Michael's behavior is his ability to mask his dark side with calm, intelligent conversation -- something that isn't common in 9-year-olds. Psychologist Mark Dadds explains, "No one is comfortable labeling a 5-year-old a psychopath, [but] the research showing that this temperament exists and can be identified in young children is quite strong." But should a kid ever be labeled a "psychopath"?

Top Opinion
-
JanHopkins 2012/05/15 14:18:33Yes+15Yeah. Some kids are born that way and the sooner it is diagnosed the sooner measures can be taken to insure it doesn't get out of control.





















Others are BORN a psychopath... so those that are born a psychopath, age has nothing to do with it.
"The apple doesn't fall far from the tree" DAMMITZ
Basically the kid is suffering with a mental illness that needs to be treated with proper medication, and family care.......
There's virtually zero science in psychiatry. All those illnesses are invented by a bunch of individual at the APA and voted into existence. Or out of existence, as it happened with homosexuality, due to lobby pressure.
Scientific medicine, doesn't work like that. You don't invent and don't vote real diseases like diabetes, cancer, infection with HIV into existence or out of existence. Also, you don't use relative and totally subjective concepts, like good, bad, somewhat stressful, less stressful, but clear measurements of real things, like blood pressure and so on.
It's really shocking to see how clueless most people are about science and medicine in general.
Today I learned I am a psychopath too.