Quantcast

Bush/GOP screwed up on 9/11 Intel more than once : 9/11could've been avoided !?

Jeff King 2012/09/11 22:16:40
Yes Bush & the GOP failed in keeping U.S. safe
Bush & the GOP didn't fail in keeping U.S. safe
You!
Add Photos & Videos
http://openchannel.nbcnews.com/_news/2012/09/11/13809524-evid...
By Robert Windrem
NBC News

On the 11th anniversary of the worst terrorist attack on U.S. soil, there is mounting evidence that the Bush administration received more intelligence warnings than previously known prior to the Sept. 11 attacks that killed nearly 3,000.

Kurt Eichenwald, a former New York Times reporter, wrote in an op-ed piece in Tuesday’s newspaper about a number of previously unknown warnings relayed to the White House by U.S. intelligence in the weeks and months prior to the attacks. Eichenwald wrote of the warnings in his new book, “500 Days: Secrets and Lies in the Terror Wars.” And former US intelligence officials say there were even more warnings, pointing to a little noticed section of George Tenet’s memoir, “At the Center of the Storm.”

In it, Tenet describes a July 10, 2001, meeting at the White House in the office of Condoleezza Rice, then President George W. Bush’s national security adviser. The meeting was not discussed in the 9-11 Commission’s final report on the attacks, although Tenet wrote that he provided information on it to the commission.

What’s critical to understanding the difference between this meeting and others, says one former senior U.S. intelligence official who spoke with NBC News on condition of anonymity, is that the intelligence provided that day was fresh, some of it having been collected the previous day. And other intelligence and national security officials, also speaking on condition of anonymity, say the briefings make clear that, while Bush administration officials understood the nature of the threat, they didn’t understand its magnitude and urgency.

“This intelligence delivered on July 10 was specific and was generated within 24 hours of the meeting,” said the first official, who pointed out the text in the Tenet memoir.

Tenet wrote about how after being briefed by his counterterrorism team on July 10 -- two months prior to the attacks -- “I picked up the big white secure phone on the left side of my desk -- the one with a direct line to Condi Rice -- and told her that I needed to see her immediately to provide an update on the al-Qaida threat.”

Tenet said he could not recall another time in his seven years as director of the CIA that he sought such an urgent meeting at the White House. Rice agreed to the meeting immediately, and 15 minutes later, he was in Rice’s office.

An analyst handed out the briefing packages Tenet had just seen and began to speak. “His opening line got everyone’s attention,” Tenet wrote, “in part because it left no room for misunderstanding: ‘There will be a significant terrorist attack in the coming weeks or months!'”

The team laid out in a series of slides its concerns, based on intelligence that included information “from the past 24 hours.”

Citing his notes on the briefing, Tenet wrote, “A chart displayed seven specific pieces of intelligence gathered over the past twenty-four hours, all of them predicting an imminent attack. Among the items: Islamic extremists were traveling to Afghanistan in greater numbers, and there had been significant departures of extremist families from Yemen. Other signs pointed to new threats against U.S. interests in Lebanon, Morocco, and Mauritania.”

A second chart followed, listing a summation of the most chilling comments by al-Qaida. According to Tenet, they were: • A mid-June statement from Osama bin Laden to trainees that there will be an attack in the near future.

• Information that talked about moving toward decisive acts.

• Late June information that cited a “big event” that was forthcoming.

• “Two separate bits of information collected only a few days before our meeting in which people were predicting a stunning turn of events in the weeks ahead.”

Another slide detailed how Chechen Islamic terrorist leader Ibn Kattab had promised some “very big news” to his troops.

There were more details, as laid out by one of Tenet’s top analysts, known in the book as “Rich B.” Tenet recounts his aide telling Rice and others, “The attack will be ‘spectacular.’ and designed to inflict mass casualties against U.S. facilities and interests. ‘Attack preparations have been made,’ he said. ‘Multiple and simultaneous attacks are possible, and they will occur with little or no warning. Al-Qaida is waiting us out and looking for vulnerability.”

Rice, Tenet wrote, reacted positively to the briefing and asked her counter terrorism adviser, Richard Clarke, if he agreed with the assessment. Clarke said he did, and Tenet said he and his aides left the meeting feeling that Rice understood the threat. However, he wrote, the White House never followed up on the presidential finding that Tenet had been asking for since March, authorizing broader covert action against al-Qaida. That finding was signed by President Bush on Sept. 17, six days after the attacks.

Roger Cressey, who was Clarke’s deputy and is now an NBC News counter terrorism analyst, says one thing that is missing from Tenet’s description of the events is that the intelligence pointed to overseas attacks. although CIA did tell officials that they couldn’t discount an attack on the US homeland.

“Everything we had (from US intelligence) pointed overseas, specifically to the Gulf,” he said. “There was no actionable intelligence that pointed to the homeland. What we did know, and what we told domestic agencies, was there was "a disturbance in the force” and we were very worried about an attack.

Still, Cressey remains critical of the lack of a response going back to the first week of the administration, saying the counterterrorism team at the National Security Council and experts elsewhere in the government were “butting our heads against the wall” in an effort to get a meaningful response from the White House.

Would action by the White House have helped? Like Eichenwald, Cressey says he isn’t sure, but notes that when similar intelligence pointed to attacks on Jan. 1, 2000, “Sandy Berger (Rice’s predecessor) and (President Bill) Clinton went to battle stations.” Did warnings prior to the millennium help thwart a number of attacks back then? Cressey believes they did. One intelligence official also noted that after the interception of the July intelligence, there was little conversation on the al-Qaida communications network prior to Sept. 11. It wasn’t until much later U.S. intelligence understood why: With the plans and operational personnel in place, the plotters were simply waiting for an opportune time to strike.

“They laid low because they were waiting for Congress to come back in session,” the official said.

The reason, he said: United Flight 93 was headed for the U.S. Capitol, where Congress was in session, when passengers overpowered the hijackers, causing the plane to crash in a field near Shanksville, Pa.

Robert Windrem is a senior investigative producer for NBC News.


Add a comment above

Top Opinion

  • les_gvt 2012/09/11 22:25:13
    Bush & the GOP didn't fail in keeping U.S. safe
    les_gvt
    +4
    The failure is on Clinton, because he had the chance to snag Bin Laden twice and did not do it

Sort By
  • Most Raves
  • Least Raves
  • Oldest
  • Newest
Opinions

  • THE ONE Jeff King 2012/09/18 05:30:47
    THE ONE
    TRUE...CLINTON JUST ALLOWED SADDAM TO SHOOT AT U.S. WAR PLANES ON NEARLY A DAILY BASIS.
  • Jeff King THE ONE 2012/09/12 22:11:57
  • THE ONE Jeff King 2012/09/13 06:13:55
    THE ONE
    America's Presidents don't dictate what happens in other nations what a stupid thing to say

    OH REALLY? THINK YOUR BEING NAIVE?
  • Ncrdbl1 THE ONE 2012/09/16 20:49:54 (edited)
    Ncrdbl1
    +1
    I wouldn't go as far as suggest Libya was our ally. MK was however a gilded dictator who had no power outside of Libya but did control the power of Islamic fundamentalist groups in Libya. Mostly to keep his own power but he did keep them under control. Egypt was our ally and they did have a peace treaty with Israel and kept the land border between Egypt and Gaza close to limit access to the region by terrorist and terrorism supplies. Obama's action in these two countries have put Islamic fundamentalist in the position of power and led directly to the attacks during the anniversary of 9/11. Ever wonder why he has not offer air support for Syrian rebels????

    As far as Bush. When he took office a large number of the White House computers were either damaged or stolen by Clinton staffers.. Along with other acts of vandalism by Clinton staffers. Bush spent a major portion of his first year WITHOUT a full cabinet because Dems in the senate refused to confirm his appointees. He was realistically 6 months behind on what would be a normal transition due to the childish actions of Dems who refuse to accept the results of the election..
  • Jeff King THE ONE 2012/09/12 01:37:16
  • THE ONE Jeff King 2012/09/12 02:03:36
    THE ONE
    YEAH....YOU GOT THAT RIGHT....."FINALLY". IT WAS REPORTED THAT IT TOOK leon panetta AND hillary clinton 16 HOURS TO TALK OBAMA INTO SAYING "YES". WAS REPORTED NEAR MUTINY.
  • Jeff King THE ONE 2012/09/12 22:16:52
  • THE ONE Jeff King 2012/09/13 06:15:01
    THE ONE
    YOU STATEMENT SHOWS HOW SMALL YOU THINK.
  • THE ONE Jeff King 2012/09/17 18:44:32
    THE ONE
    WHY HAS OBAMA NOT KILLED Dr. Ayman al-Zawahiri YET?
  • Jeff King THE ONE 2012/09/17 18:52:57
  • THE ONE Jeff King 2012/09/17 19:06:34
    THE ONE
    ACCORDING TO YOU...."Bush wasn't really trying to capture/kill him because with Bin Ladin alive Bush'd War on Terror could last forever"

    SO NOW TELL US WHY OBAMA HAS NOT KILLED Dr. Ayman al-Zawahiri YET?

    YOU LIBERALS ARE SO WEAK MINDED YOU ANSWER QUESTIONS WITH OTHER QUESTIONS CUZ PELOSI IS NOT THERE TO TELL YOU WHAT YOU SHOULD THINK.
  • Ncrdbl1 THE ONE 2012/09/16 21:03:30 (edited)
    Ncrdbl1
    Still then the order had strict limitations. If there was any kind of change in any variables they had to stop call in and get permission from Obama to continue. If they had gotten information that he had just left his compound and was taking a walk while they were in the air. They were required to stand down and call in to get permission from Obama before going after him.
  • mustang... THE ONE 2012/09/11 22:58:34
  • THE ONE mustang... 2012/09/12 00:46:22
    THE ONE
    +1
    THE GUY IN THE CAPTION MUST BE AT THE DNC CONVENTION DURING THE OBAMA SPEECH.
  • mustang... THE ONE 2012/09/12 21:20:00
  • THE ONE mustang... 2012/09/13 06:16:19
    THE ONE
    +1
    IS THAT AN EMPTY SUIT IN AND EMPTY CHAIR? WHEN DID OBAMA GET HERE?
  • mustang... THE ONE 2012/09/17 03:53:23

See Votes by State

The map above displays the winning answer by region.

News & Politics

2014/07/25 20:41:36

Hot Questions on SodaHead
More Hot Questions

More Community More Originals