Quantcast

Bush and Public Opinion, The Final Verdict

Ric O'Shea® 2008/12/24 18:01:25
I Agree
I Disagree
Polls Suck
Undecided
None of the above
You!
Add Photos & Videos
Reviewing the Bush Years and the Public's Final Verdict
December 18, 2008

As George W. Bush prepares to leave the White House, the United States is in many ways dramatically different from when he took the oath of office in 2001. His first few months as president were largely unremarkable, despite the contentious 2000 election. But the horrific terror attacks of Sept. 11, 2001 greatly altered the course forward.

The attacks transformed American public opinion and fundamentally reshaped Bush's image. His job approval rating reached 86% by late September. The public expressed broad willingness to use military force to combat terrorism. But then controversies over the build-up to war in Iraq and other Bush policies started to take their toll -- at home and abroad.

U.S. forces quickly ousted Saddam Hussein in 2003, but could not create a lasting peace. As the fighting dragged on, Bush won re-election by a narrow margin. In his second term, he failed in his bid to build support for a partial privatization of Social Security. American deaths continued in Iraq, the government bungled the response to the devastating Hurricane Katrina in late 2005 and political scandal reached directly into the White House.

devastating hurricane katrina late 2005 political scandal reached white house

Soon, economic troubles started to mount, and in 2008, the economy went into a dangerous free fall that led to controversial and expensive government intervention in financial markets. The president's approval ratings slid over time to historic lows. His approval last hit 50% as he started his second term. It stood at just 24% in early December.

Not surprisingly, the public's verdict on the Bush presidency is overwhelmingly negative. In a December 2008 Pew Research Center survey, just 11% said Bush will be remembered as an outstanding or above average president -- by far the lowest positive end-of-term rating for any of the past four presidents. Yet Bush's impact on public opinion over the past eight years is seen in ways that go well beyond his personal unpopularity.

He helped shape the post-9/11 climate of opinion that was broadly accepting of a muscular approach to U.S. national security. And even after much of the public came to oppose the war in Iraq, there continued to be considerable support for the Bush doctrine of preemptive military action. In spite of the public's shock over pictures of abuse of detainees at the U.S.-run Abu Ghraib prison, nearly half of Americans consistently said that the torture of terrorists to gain key information was at least sometimes justified.

In the final year of his presidency, even as his approval rating steadily declined to historic lows, most Americans continued to say Bush's anti-terror policies deserve at least a fair amount of credit for preventing more terror attacks.

In his first term, Bush scored several early legislative successes on domestic issues -- such as the No Child Left Behind education reform, two rounds of tax cuts and the launch of a significant Medicare drug plan.

But after those successes, the instances when Bush was able to mobilize -- and maintain -- public support for his agenda were rare. Even in the realm of national security, the public increasingly rejected the idea that a large military presence overseas would reduce the threat of terror at home

Public backing for what was to have been Bush's signature second-term achievement -- reforming the Social Security system -- withered within months of his reelection. His immigration reform proposal faced opposition within his own party, even though it was an issue -- like Social Security -- where Americans recognized major change was needed.

What might have damaged Bush's legacy most was his administration's mixed record of competent governance. Between Iraq, the government's flawed relief effort in the aftermath of Hurricane Katrina, and more minor missteps over the Dubai ports issue and other matters, the government "brand" deteriorated badly during the Bush years. In late April 2008, just 37% expressed a favorable view of the federal government, about half of the percentage of five years earlier (73%).

37 expressed favorable view federal government percentage years earlier 73

Final Judgments

In a Pew survey conducted Dec. 3-7 among 1,489 adults, the American public paints a harshly negative picture of Bush's tenure. Nearly two-thirds (64%) say his administration will be remembered more for its failures than its accomplishments, and a plurality (34%) says Bush will go down in history as a poor president. Fully 68% say they disapprove of Bush's performance and most of those -- 53% of the public -- say they disapprove strongly. That is the highest rate of strong disapproval measured by Pew surveys in Bush's eight years in office.

As his second term ends, only 13% say Bush has made progress toward solving the major issues facing the country; 37% say he has made those problems worse and 34% say he has tried but failed in his efforts. Another 11% say he has not addressed the major problems facing the country.

More than three times as many people say Bush will go down in history as a poor president (34%) than said the same of Bill Clinton at the end of his presidency (11%). About a quarter (24%) say Bush will be seen as below average and close to three-in-ten (28%) say he will be seen as average. Just 11% say he will go down in history as above average or outstanding.

Not surprisingly, the most critical assessments come from Democrats. More than half (53%) say Bush will go down in history as a poor president, while 25% say he will be remembered as below average. More than four-in-ten Republicans (44%) say he will be remembered as an average president; 21% say below average and 6% say poor. Two-in-ten say he will be remembered as above average, while 7% say outstanding.

Americans by a wide margin (64% to 24%) also say that in the long run the failures of the Bush administration will outweigh its accomplishments. The assessment of Clinton in 2001, despite controversy over how he had conducted himself in office, was virtually a mirror image. Six-in-ten said the accomplishments would outweigh the failures, and 27% said the failures would outweigh the accomplishments.

Just over half (52%) of Republicans say the Bush administration will be best known for its accomplishments. That number is significantly smaller for independents (20%) and Democrats (8%). When Clinton was leaving office, his own party (77%) and independents (60%) were much more convinced he would be remembered for his accomplishments.

clinton leaving office party 77 independents 60 convinced remembered accomplishments

Second Term Approval Slide

Between the start of his second term and December 2008, Bush's approval rating dropped from 50% to 24%, a level that rivals the historic lows recorded by Gallup for Harry S. Truman as he left office in 1952. Declines came across demographic and political groups, though significant divides still exist among those with differing political ideologies.

Approval among moderate and liberal Republicans saw one of the sharpest drops -- from 82% to 50%. Conservative Republican approval dropped from 94% to 66%. Independent approval started at below half in 2005 -- 47% -- but dropped to 18% by December 2008. The change among Democratic groups, already highly critical of Bush, proved less dramatic. Approval among conservative and moderate Democrats dropped from 22% to 8%, while approval among liberal Democrats dropped from 7% to 2%.

Bush's approval dropped significantly among all education levels. In terms of age groups, the largest decline came among the youngest voters - those age 18-29. Within that group, approval dropped from 50% to 19%. The oldest group - age 65 and up - experienced a smaller decline, dropping from 47% to 26%.

oldest group age 65 experienced smaller decline dropping 47 26

A Legacy of War

When people are asked what they think Bush will be most remembered for after he leaves office, the most frequent responses volunteered are tied to the wars in Iraq and Afghanistan and the fight against terrorism. More than half (51%) of responses mention facets of the Global War on Terror, with close to three-in-ten (29%) specifically mentioning Iraq.

About 17% include specific negative assessments of Bush and his performance. Small percentages within that group refer to his competence (2%), his negative impact on the country (2%) or label him the "worst president" (2%). Another 13% refer to the impact of the Sept. 11 terror attacks, with 9% mentioning the attacks specifically and 3% noting that Bush had kept the country safe from major attack since that day. Another 12% mentions economic issues, including 7% who refer to the economy specifically, 4% who mention the current crisis and 3% referring to the recession. Another 4% offer positive assessments of Bush's performance in office.

Meanwhile, concerns about Bush's effectiveness are also seen in the one-word answers people give to describe their impressions of the president. In mid-2005, positive one-word descriptions outnumbered negative ones, but in more recent lists, the responses have been more negative. The most frequently mentioned description in the latest survey was "incompetent," just as it was in February 2007 and March 2006. Many of the terms offered by respondents in the December 2008 survey are negative, though the second most frequently mentioned description was honest. Good and honorable also make the list.

The Global Outlook

On the foreign stage, a solid majority of Americans say the country is significantly less respected than in the past -- and many of those people see that as a major problem. Many Americans are eager to turn inward to deal with this nation's problems: fully 60% said in September 2008 that domestic policy should be the primary focus of the new president. And a greater percentage than before the Iraq war now say the best way to reduce the threat of terror is to reduce America's military presence overseas, not increase it.

Meanwhile, a 2008 survey by the Pew Global Attitudes Project showed that majorities in 19 of the 24 nations -- including several strong U.S. allies -- had little confidence in Bush as he neared the end of his presidency. A 2007 survey of 45 nations found anti-American sentiment extensive as well as increasing disapproval for key elements of U.S. foreign policy.

And the image of the U.S. in the Muslim world remained abysmal. Iraq, the war on terrorism and American support for Israel continued to generate animosity in the Middle East, Asia and elsewhere. In many nations considered central to the war on terror, the general public deeply distrusted the United States. Even in countries like Kuwait that have long been considered relatively pro-American, the U.S. image had declined.

Among the few bright spots for Bush in the Global Attitudes surveys were the African nations that had benefited from administration programs to boost economic growth and reduce the spread of AIDS. In 2008, majorities in Tanzania and Nigeria expressed confidence in the president.

Still, Bush has had some success at home building support for tough tactics -- including harsh interrogation policies for foreign detainees and government monitoring of phone calls or e-mails without warrants -- to gather information about possible terrorists and stop potential attacks. On balance, more Americans say they worry that anti-terror policies have not gone far enough in protecting the United States than say they feel the anti-terror policies have "gone too far in restricting civil liberties."

The Political Legacy

When Bush took office, Republicans controlled both Congress and the White House. But voter party preferences shifted significantly during Bush's second term as missteps, bad news and scandals took their toll on Bush and GOP congressional leaders. In the 2006 midterm elections, more independents and moderates aligned themselves with the party out of power and Democrats took control of the House and the Senate.

In 2008, Bush was barely seen during the presidential campaign. Both Barack Obama and John McCain persistently criticized his administration, vowing to bring "change" to Washington. Obama's significant win and additional Democratic gains in Congress signaled a continuing decline of the Republican Party under Bush.

In surveys conducted in the fall of 2008, 51% of all voters said they thought of themselves as Democrats or leaned toward the Democratic Party. That was up five points from 46% during the same period in 2004. Meanwhile, the number identifying with or leaning toward the Republican Party fell from 45% to 41%.

The greatest gains came among younger voters. Only among voters age 65 and older did the percentage identifying with the Democratic Party decrease -- from 49% in 2004 to 47% in 2008. The percentage of voters age 18 to 29 identifying with the Democratic Party increased from 48% in the fall of 2004 to 61% in the fall of 2008. Democrats now outnumber Republicans by a margin of nearly two-to-one (61% to 32%) in this age group, up from only a seven-point advantage in 2004.


http://pewresearch.org/pubs/1063/bush-and-public-opinion
http://people-press.org/report/478/bush-legacy-public-opinion
Add a comment above

Top Opinion

  • A.B.E. 2009/04/08 18:39:05
    I Agree
    A.B.E.
    +3
    having Al gore as president would have made living more costly, especially because he would have invested in ethanol even though its been proven to be inefficient

Sort By
  • Most Raves
  • Least Raves
  • Oldest
  • Newest
Opinions

  • A.B.E. 2009/04/08 18:39:05
    I Agree
    A.B.E.
    +3
    having Al gore as president would have made living more costly, especially because he would have invested in ethanol even though its been proven to be inefficient
  • dick 2009/03/15 18:24:05
    I Disagree
    dick
    bush has put our country back for years
  • Franklin 2009/03/10 15:17:26
    None of the above
    Franklin
    The date is false. Fact is it is a cooked up set of books at best an out right scam at worst. I have to laugh at the MEDIA poll and its rush to close the door on this one before Obama can rewrite 8 years of negative campaigning and make Bush into a far greater success than he ever would have been on his own! ...
  • Cindy 2009/03/06 18:20:12
    Polls Suck
    Cindy
    Republicans have had the majority in Congress most of the time over the past 35 years! Their policies brought America to it's financial knees.
    Their policies have created an ever divisive America to insure they keep majorities.
    Sad.
    But America did vote for change (beginning in 2006).
    I believe they want:
    1) Not "affordable" healthcare, but quality (the best) Universal Healthcare. That coverage is not the responsibility of the employer (a repub idea) - but it is "we the people's" responsibility through governing since the Industrial and Tech ages filled our genes with bloodstreams that carry some 300 chemicals, making us sicker.
    AND I believe IF we closed the illegal Bush Office of Faithbased Intitiatives and turn those annual billions given to the thousands of new tax free business' created that past 8 years to HEALTHCARE, we'd have a good start on reforming a broken healthcare system.

    The faith program is big government. It is illegal, abused, riddled with mistakes and controlled by the Corp Gods and Religious Big Business. It is challenged in courts all over the land since inception, at high costs and a waste re: separation of church and state. It is the very definition of President Obama's "programs that do not work."

    Americans understand free trade. But they also understand ...

    '


    '
    Republicans have had the majority in Congress most of the time over the past 35 years! Their policies brought America to it's financial knees.
    Their policies have created an ever divisive America to insure they keep majorities.
    Sad.
    But America did vote for change (beginning in 2006).
    I believe they want:
    1) Not "affordable" healthcare, but quality (the best) Universal Healthcare. That coverage is not the responsibility of the employer (a repub idea) - but it is "we the people's" responsibility through governing since the Industrial and Tech ages filled our genes with bloodstreams that carry some 300 chemicals, making us sicker.
    AND I believe IF we closed the illegal Bush Office of Faithbased Intitiatives and turn those annual billions given to the thousands of new tax free business' created that past 8 years to HEALTHCARE, we'd have a good start on reforming a broken healthcare system.

    The faith program is big government. It is illegal, abused, riddled with mistakes and controlled by the Corp Gods and Religious Big Business. It is challenged in courts all over the land since inception, at high costs and a waste re: separation of church and state. It is the very definition of President Obama's "programs that do not work."

    Americans understand free trade. But they also understand that NOBODY makes multiple millions or billions without tactics and manipulation/oppression of others.

    We want Universal Healthcare - the best. Tax us, tax the rich and revamp the faith based office. The entire exisiting Healthcare program fails because it's premise was greedy and wrong with special interests and insurance. Make the Insurance industry he NEW green one.

    AND 2)
    get real! A president CANNOT use the law and attorneys to redefine our Constitution for his ideology and policies! Bush and friends have created our financial crisis and the worst American spirit slump in history. We will not work for or obey traitors - willful or through leadership ignorance. Sen. Leahy's plans to investigate Bush are a stall and the country will not accept another Nixon like pardon of events and people. We do not want revenge,. We want justice that OUR LAW provides us. In part, the new Administration MUST understand this too was a mandate of the people, beginning in the 2006 elections.
    (more)
  • Franklin Cindy 2009/03/10 15:22:18
    Franklin
    You are blind! Obama did not close the faith based initiative , in FACT he added funds to it....
  • gloopstick (in Deo non credo.) 2009/02/08 17:22:36 (edited)
    I Agree
    gloopstick (in Deo non credo.)
    Excellent post, wombmeat!

    I think that history will be even less kind to King George than public opinion had been while he was in office. The more we learn about His Majesty's administration, the more detailed the picture will emerge of an intellectually lazy "president" who valued ideological purity over pragmatism, who really liked to stick it to those with whom he disagreed, and whose incompetence had an embarrassing flair for the melodramatic. Good riddance to him.
  • str8jacket 2009/01/28 17:21:35
    Undecided
    str8jacket
    I'm just glad that we have the opportunity to try something different.
    undecided glad opportunity
  • Michaelene 2009/01/19 16:34:29
    Polls Suck
    Michaelene
    What is the question?
  • luly 2009/01/16 02:48:49
    Polls Suck
    luly
    +1
    Polls are like a rose bush...As long as the rose remains pretty the polls go up,
    Let that thorn prick your finger and all hell breaks loose. bush rose remains pretty polls thorn prick finger breaks loose
  • Kack 2008/12/30 13:35:05
    Polls Suck
    Kack
    These kinds of polls are misleading. How can we possibly know whether or not we approve of the way any president handles anything until we are privvy to the same information they are?
  • outlaw 2008/12/27 15:27:57
    I Agree
    outlaw
    +1
    It took a lot of people way to long to see through this nut case. It scares me that there is still 1/4 of the population that still thinks he is helping this Country rather than hurting it.
  • MJ 2008/12/27 01:13:15
    I Agree
    MJ
    Just sick that not enough people can see how bad this reign has been. Approval ratings should not reach double-digits with a right-minded public.
  • Congrats Obama! 2008/12/25 02:46:50
    None of the above
    Congrats Obama!
    +2
    The public slowly but surely woke up to the truth. Too late. Their out of jobs now , health insurance and the very roof over their heads.
  • Franklin Congrat... 2009/03/10 15:20:58
    Franklin
    +1
    Cry me a river! Your “super team” is not even close to helping this nation or its people in fact your guys are driving it farther down than it has ever gone before! If the MEDIA did not have a stack in promoting Democrats in general and Obama to be precise we would be seeing the truth of our current Depression and laying the blame where it belongs....if he is such “hot shit” then why does he still need all this protection by all his supporters? If he had a clue his ideas would stand on their own without legions of brain dead followers promoting them!
  • wendy wooo''In GOD I trust." 2008/12/24 22:00:06
    Undecided
    wendy wooo''In GOD I trust."
    +1
    sadly I didn't have time to read it so I just choose the undecided answer.
  • WORLDPEACE 2008/12/24 20:17:57 (edited)
    I Agree
    WORLDPEACE
    +1
    To the Hague with all of them! Change that to none of the above.
  • Roundabout ~ Pepe is my soc... 2008/12/24 19:24:51
    None of the above
    Roundabout ~ Pepe is my sock puppet
    +2
    Polls rarely ever poll a representative sample. Even Pew would agree. They didn't disclose the actual questions they asked and the context within which the questions were asked. Having said this, the polls are likely to be right, however, considering the source. The public they are polling is not very knowledgeable of what the administration is doing. The answer the questions based on IF they are getting what THEY WANT not is the president doing what is good for the country. Did you know that the approval rating of the Democrat Congress is half of what Bush's approval rating is? If you haven't seen this video it is a must!

  • stan.sh... Roundab... 2013/03/25 03:58:59
  • stan.sh... Roundab... 2013/03/25 04:03:03
    stan.shaw.1217
    And the same thing goes the other way, all the crap the media said about bush and them covered crap up to make it seem true, hurt him in the public eye. My only thing agaisnt Bush was that he would not get his ass on tv and rebuke the lies with the facts. he said it was berneath the office. Well he hurt those that voted for him in so doing. Hell even clinton would get on tv and lie his ass off to counter the truth that came out about him nightly. Itas a Bizzarro world out there now, what use to be right is now wrong, and what use to be wrong is now right. And we wonder why oue country is going to hell in a handbasket.
  • liemtenshi 2008/12/24 18:47:13
    Polls Suck
    liemtenshi
    Polls is always taken from a small number of people to represent all.
    However, the result of the poll can always be manipulate to support one's argument by hand picked/ selected the small number that you picked to fill the poll.

    It just my opinion and I stick to it.
  • BOOGIE-WOOGIE-MUSIC-MAN-ROC... 2008/12/24 18:13:03 (edited)
    Polls Suck
    BOOGIE-WOOGIE-MUSIC-MAN-ROCK-N-R
    +1
    A few years ago, the local TV stations had a feature on their web sites wheere You could vote for or against. I discovered that you could vote as many times as You wished. I think they changed all of that with passwords and a cookie or two dropped into the net folder.

    I look at the past 8 Years of negative politics out of Washington, the same way I recovered from hurricane ivan and Katrina. after they have been gone a couple of years we will still be cleaning up the mess.

See Votes by State

The map above displays the winning answer by region.

News & Politics

2013/05/25 22:21:15

Hot Questions on SodaHead
More Hot Questions

More Community More Originals