Quantcast

Bush 41, Gorbachev, Rockefeller, and the NWO

Temlakos~POTL~PWCM~JLA~☆ 2013/02/13 02:11:24
Take to the hills!
Lock and load!
Take to the hills AND lock and load!
This is GREAT! Who wouldn't want a one-world government?
Nothing to see here. Move on.
You!
Add Photos & Videos

President George H. W. Bush said in his 1991 State of the Union Address:

What is at stake is more than one small country (that’s
us, folks!) – it is a big idea – a new world order, where diverse nations are drawn together in a common cause to achieve the universal aspirations of mankind: peace and security, freedom, and the rule of law. Such is a world worthy of our struggle, and worthy of our
children’s future.

Mikhail Gorbachev said this in his historic address to the United Nations on December 7, 1988:

Further global progress is now possible only through a quest for universal consensus in the movement towards a new world order.

In September 1994, David Rockefeller said,

We are on the verge of a global transformation. All we need is the right major crisis and the nations will accept the new world order.

In 1991, David Rockefeller said in Baden-Baden:

We are grateful to the Washington Post, The New York Times, Time Magazine and other great publications whose directors have attended our meetings and respected their promises of discretion for almost forty years.

It would have been impossible for us to develop our plan for the world if we had been subjected to the lights of publicity during those years. But, the world is now more sophisticated and prepared to march towards a world government.

The supranational sovereignty of an intellectual elite and world bankers is surely preferable to the national auto-determination practiced in past centuries.

Well, there you have it. Straight from the mouth of the White Horse of the Apocalypse, if you like. You will notice that David Rockefeller brazenly told that gathering just how long this had been going on--and he said it twenty-two years ago.

So what are you going to do about it?

Read More: http://www.conservativenewsandviews.com/2013/02/12...

Add a comment above

Top Opinion

  • Temlakos~POTL~PWCM~JLA~☆ 2013/02/13 02:15:51
    Take to the hills AND lock and load!
    Temlakos~POTL~PWCM~JLA~☆
    +14
    The evidence is as damning as it is conclusive. For more than sixty years a cabal of politicians and news executives has worked for this moment.And in the current de facto President, they have the perfect "face" for their new regime.

    You're likely to see another terrorist incident. Those Muslims who provided the public face of the Nine-eleven Incident are just fool enough to play right into their hands. As they might have wound up doing the last time.

    So *we* have to harden ourselves. And make clear that we'll have no truck with either of them.

Sort By
  • Most Raves
  • Least Raves
  • Oldest
  • Newest
Opinions

  • Beccy 2013/02/15 23:24:49
    Take to the hills AND lock and load!
    Beccy
    +2
    If any one really read their history they would know that these people and their families before them have been enemies to the people of the united states for a very long time. First they hit us with desegratation and affirmative action, then they start shipping our jobs over seas. They have distroyed our country
  • happyday49 2013/02/15 07:29:42
    Take to the hills!
    happyday49
    +2
    The Plan was established years ago. It wouldn't be easy to take apart and ruin Amercia, because of the Constitution, freedoms, morality, belief in God, free market, a strong military and fiscal responsibilty. Look how it is being torn apart, line by line, bit by bit, and we are beng bamboozeld from the White House to the Court House, as well as the so called news reporters!!! Most of the taxpayers bailout money, investment money, etc. went to the Central Banks,or phoney start ups like Solyndra that have gone bankrupt, and we are being ask to pay higher taxes on the taxes. We are being ask to understand and be fair, when all the while they are not, (take Al Gore, Pelosi, Reid, and Obama for examples, they've become filthy rich while serving us). That's the Dems and the GOP are cooperating with this plan. The depth, width, height of these plans are astounding, so you will either be prepared or non-prepared. Choose to believe or not believe. Can't say that you weren't warned! Peace out.
  • kenc.63 2013/02/14 16:28:17
  • kenc.63 kenc.63 2013/02/16 02:22:56 (edited)
  • kaZappoo 2013/02/14 04:24:57
    Lock and load!
    kaZappoo
    +5
    well we patriots are aware of the intent ,,,and we'll not go peacefully ..

    the rest are pompassazzed hypnotized fools !
  • Gwen 2013/02/14 04:01:56
    Nothing to see here. Move on.
    Gwen
    I think he means a "new world order" of charity and forgiveness of our transgressions.
  • kaZappoo Gwen 2013/02/14 04:26:15
    kaZappoo
    +7
    you arent that foolish are you ?

    then again ,,yeah you are !
  • Gwen kaZappoo 2013/02/14 04:28:23
    Gwen
    thank goodness this is an opinion site. I can see you have an opinion.
  • Dan Gwen 2013/02/14 15:19:22
    Dan
    +2
    Really? You believe that?

  • kenc.63 Gwen 2013/02/14 16:24:07
  • Mike 2013/02/14 02:29:53
    Nothing to see here. Move on.
    Mike
    +1
    NWO has been discussed since the 1940's
  • Old Salt Mike 2013/02/14 03:02:31
  • Rick Armin Old Salt 2013/02/14 18:37:37
    Rick Armin
    +1
    75 years and millions if not billions in aid from western banks and the U.S. government. It started with the financing of the Bolshevik Revolution and probably continues today.

    Somewhere, buried in my files, is an article from I think the 80's telling how the Soviets always paid back the loans from the bankers but not from the U.S. taxpayers. Who did they really fear?
  • Old Salt Rick Armin 2013/02/14 19:33:18
  • Rick Armin Old Salt 2013/02/14 20:35:00
    Rick Armin
    +1
    There's plenty of evidence that we became that same government almost from the beginning. The "founders" who wrote the Constitution were, for the most part, far different from those who signed the Declaration of Independence.

    The Two Nations, Christopher Hollis 1935
    As soon as Independence had been won from Great Britain, the decks were clear for a second fight. That fight, as is usually found after a successful revolution, was the fight to decide whether independence was to be true independence or whether, after the change of names, the financial system was to re-establish over the new government that same control which it had exercised over the old. The protagonist of plutocracy, a surprisingly frank protagonist, was Alexander Hamilton. Among his proposals was one astonishing in its impudence even for the antagonist of such a cause. The Germans in our own day have carried to a fine art the technique of first defaulting on the interest of their loans and then, when as a result the bonds have slumped, buying them up at a fraction of their par value and thus getting rid of their debts for perhaps a quarter of what they originally borrowed. Things were not very different in Alexander Hamilton's America. In order to fight the war, Congress had raised certain loans and then h...
    There's plenty of evidence that we became that same government almost from the beginning. The "founders" who wrote the Constitution were, for the most part, far different from those who signed the Declaration of Independence.

    The Two Nations, Christopher Hollis 1935
    As soon as Independence had been won from Great Britain, the decks were clear for a second fight. That fight, as is usually found after a successful revolution, was the fight to decide whether independence was to be true independence or whether, after the change of names, the financial system was to re-establish over the new government that same control which it had exercised over the old. The protagonist of plutocracy, a surprisingly frank protagonist, was Alexander Hamilton. Among his proposals was one astonishing in its impudence even for the antagonist of such a cause. The Germans in our own day have carried to a fine art the technique of first defaulting on the interest of their loans and then, when as a result the bonds have slumped, buying them up at a fraction of their par value and thus getting rid of their debts for perhaps a quarter of what they originally borrowed. Things were not very different in Alexander Hamilton's America. In order to fight the war, Congress had raised certain loans and then had subsequently defaulted on their interest. As a result, of course, they stood very low and were only sellable at a fourth or a fifth part of their par value. Alexander Hamilton, the Secretary of the Treasury, gave private information to his financial friends, who therefore bought up the loan at its low market figure. He then announced that the Government would redeem it by paying off the present holders at par plus accrued interest, with the price-level considerably lower than that of the time of the contraction of the debt. In order to pay them off, he raised a new loan from the New York bankers, thus saddling the new country with a permanent National Debt, which he confessed to thinking necessary in order that finance's mastery of its policies should be unshakable. "He wishes it never to be paid," explained Jefferson at the time, "but always to be a thing wherewith to corrupt and manage the legislature." He thus bound, as Calhoun afterwards put it, "more strongly to the Government that already powerful class by giving them, through its agency, increased profit and a decided control over the currency, exchanges and the business transactions of the country."
    (more)
  • Mike Old Salt 2013/02/15 01:22:21
    Mike
    +1
    No point the article insinuates this is something recent. Been in the planning for a long time
  • kaZappoo Mike 2013/02/14 04:28:37
    kaZappoo
    +3
    and the fight since the 1900' s against it !

    especially after 1913 when the fed govt. went bankrupt ...and the US was forced to borrow from these countries to sustain this country ...then brittan got in trouble w/ germany and asked for help & on & on !
  • Rick Armin Mike 2013/02/14 18:22:27 (edited)
    Rick Armin
    “It [a League] will mean, however, a certain limitation upon their [large and powerful states] freedom of action; they must renounce any claim to overcome the weaker by their superior strength, and they must forego the right in any dispute to resort straightway to force; they must be prepared to use their power in behalf of the established law though their own rights be not immediately endangered. Secret treaties and alliances must be forbidden, and disarmament be brought about.” –from Woodrow Wilson’s, “The State”, 1898, Special Edition revised by Edward Elliott, D. C. Heath & Co., 1918.

    “The old world order changed when this war-storm broke. The old international order passed away as suddenly, as unexpectedly, and as completely as if it had been wiped out by a gigantic flood, by a great tempest, or by a volcanic eruption. The old world order died with the setting of that day’s sun and a new world order is being born while I speak, with birth-pangs so terrible that it seems almost incredible that life could come out of such fearful suffering and such overwhelming sorrow.” — Nicholas Murray Butler, in an address delivered before the Union League of Philadelphia, Nov. 27, 1915

    “The peace conference has assembled. It will make the most momentous decisions in history, and upon these...



















    “It [a League] will mean, however, a certain limitation upon their [large and powerful states] freedom of action; they must renounce any claim to overcome the weaker by their superior strength, and they must forego the right in any dispute to resort straightway to force; they must be prepared to use their power in behalf of the established law though their own rights be not immediately endangered. Secret treaties and alliances must be forbidden, and disarmament be brought about.” –from Woodrow Wilson’s, “The State”, 1898, Special Edition revised by Edward Elliott, D. C. Heath & Co., 1918.

    “The old world order changed when this war-storm broke. The old international order passed away as suddenly, as unexpectedly, and as completely as if it had been wiped out by a gigantic flood, by a great tempest, or by a volcanic eruption. The old world order died with the setting of that day’s sun and a new world order is being born while I speak, with birth-pangs so terrible that it seems almost incredible that life could come out of such fearful suffering and such overwhelming sorrow.” — Nicholas Murray Butler, in an address delivered before the Union League of Philadelphia, Nov. 27, 1915

    “The peace conference has assembled. It will make the most momentous decisions in history, and upon these decisions will rest the stability of the new world order and the future peace of the world.” — M. C. Alexander, Executive Secretary of the American Association for International Conciliation, in a subscription letter for the periodical International Conciliation (1919)

    “If there are those who think we are to jump immediately into a new world order, actuated by complete understanding and brotherly love, they are doomed to disappointment. If we are ever to approach that time, it will be after patient and persistent effort of long duration. The present international situation of mistrust and fear can only be corrected by a formula of equal status, continuously applied, to every phase of international contacts, until the cobwebs of the old order are brushed out of the minds of the people of all lands.” — Dr. Augustus O. Thomas, president of the World Federation of Education Associations (August 1927), quoted in the book “International Understanding: Agencies Educating for a New World” (1931)

    “This World Youth movement claims to represent and affect the politico-social activities of a grand total of forty million adherents – under the age of thirty…It may play an important and increasing role in the consolidation of a new world order.” — H.G. Wells The Fate of Man 1939

    “… when the struggle seems to be drifting definitely towards a world social democracy, there may still be very great delays and disappointments before it becomes an efficient and beneficent world system. Countless people … will hate the new world order … and will die protesting against it. When we attempt to evaluate its promise, we have to bear in mind the distress of a generation or so of malcontents, many of them quite gallant and graceful-looking people.” — from “The New World Order”, H. G. Wells, (1939)

    The term Internationalism has been popularized in recent years to cover an interlocking financial, political, and economic world force for the purpose of establishing a World Government. Today Internationalism is heralded from pulpit and platform as a ‘League of Nations’ or a ‘Federated Union’ to which the United States must surrender a definite part of its National Sovereignty. The World Government plan is being advocated under such alluring names as the ‘New International Order,’ ‘The New World Order,’ ‘World Union Now,’ ‘World Commonwealth of Nations,’ ‘World Community,’ etc. All the terms have the same objective; however, the line of approach may be religious or political according to the taste or training of the individual.” — excerpt from A Memorial to be Addressed to the House of Bishops and the House of Clerical and Lay Deputies of the Protestant Episcopal Church in General Convention (October 1940)

    “In the first public declaration on the Jewish question since the outbreak of the war, Arthur Greenwood, member without portfolio in the British War Cabinet, assured the Jews of the United States that when victory was achieved an effort would be made to found a new world order based on the ideals of ‘justice and peace.’” — excerpt from article entitled “New World Order Pledged to Jews,” in the New York Times (October 1940)

    The above brings us to the leading edge of the 40's and there's more here. The list is somewhat extensive but by no means exhaustive.
    http://lostliberty1.wordpress...

    And here is the plan with a map to go with it. Some may have changed, and the planners may have been beaten back in some areas, but they keep plodding on and will until our Nation of Sheep becomes a part of a Globe of Sheep.

    Sodahead has apparently started blocking clicking to magnify, so I put a space between "endtime" and "pilgrim" to block an illegible copy. Just remove the space and then copy and paste to your address bar.

    Here's my take on it.
    http://lostliberty1.wordpress...
    (more)
  • yabbadabbadoo 2013/02/14 02:07:27
    Take to the hills!
    yabbadabbadoo
    +2
    i have no guns = (
  • jimmy yabbada... 2013/02/14 16:54:39
    jimmy
    +1
    get one
  • Stan We... jimmy 2013/02/15 08:39:09
    Stan Weinstein
    +2
    Get 2 or more.
  • jimmy Stan We... 2013/02/15 14:30:53
    jimmy
    whatever suits your fancy, don't you know
  • RevJim 2013/02/14 00:27:58
    Take to the hills AND lock and load!
    RevJim
    +1
    Alexander Hamilton's dream come true. Where is Aaron Burr when you need him?
  • texasred 2013/02/13 23:35:13
    Take to the hills AND lock and load!
    texasred
    +5
    It's a plan that is being implemented as we speak.
  • Old Salt texasred 2013/02/14 03:04:11
  • texasred Old Salt 2013/02/14 05:15:43
    texasred
    +6
    He thinks he's going to be one of the leaders in the NWO, but he's going to find out he's been nothing more than a useful tool for Soros.
  • Old Salt texasred 2013/02/14 05:27:32
  • 4570GOVT Old Salt 2013/02/14 14:51:11
    4570GOVT
    +5
    We Already HAVE the Concentration Camps In Place !
  • texasred Old Salt 2013/02/14 19:12:54
    texasred
    +1
    I don't think so. He's not one to stop if there is more power to be acquired. He may not be truly intelligent, but the man has cunning and street smarts. So he'll have to go.
  • 4570GOVT texasred 2013/02/14 14:34:34
    4570GOVT
    +4
    SOROS , After All , Owns Him !
  • texasred 4570GOVT 2013/02/14 19:14:52
    texasred
    +3
    I was going to say lock, stock and barrel, but that's too much Second Amendment. Then I was going to say heart and soul, but I don't believe he has a soul... already sold it to the devil. So I guess I'll go with: Soros owns every fiber of Obama's being.
  • 4570GOVT texasred 2013/02/15 15:02:35
    4570GOVT
    +2
    BINGO ! - Spot On ;-)
  • 4570GOVT texasred 2013/02/15 15:01:00
  • texasred 4570GOVT 2013/02/15 15:38:21
    texasred
    +3
    What ticks me off is the fools that can see he's naked and won't admit it.
  • 4570GOVT texasred 2013/02/15 16:07:32
    4570GOVT
    +2
    Like the Emperors lackeys that surrounded him , those that surround Obama are AFRAID to say anything ! You can see WHY everytime Obie is on tape while somebody disses him . His facial expressions speak volumes about him .
    He is surrounded by YES MEN and believes that he is a GOD !

    ................ well , at least he has a GOD complex .
  • texasred 4570GOVT 2013/02/15 19:07:08
    texasred
    +2
    Only a matter of time before he starts putting those that disagree with him in jail.
  • 4570GOVT texasred 2013/02/16 16:24:06
    4570GOVT
    +1
    " Those People " will be first to get a Cot at Camp F.E.M.A. !
  • texasred 4570GOVT 2013/02/16 16:44:46
    texasred
    +1
    See you there!!
  • 4570GOVT texasred 2013/02/16 17:14:48
    4570GOVT
    +1
    Get your bunk in the corner , so you can watch the door !
  • texasred 4570GOVT 2013/02/16 17:22:11
    texasred
    +1
    You bet!!

See Votes by State

The map above displays the winning answer by region.

News & Politics

2014/10/23 00:38:33

Hot Questions on SodaHead
More Hot Questions

More Community More Originals