Bummer. Democrat’s Walker Love Child Story Falls Apart… In About an Hour
The far left Wisconsin Citizens Media Co-op reported:
Bernadette Gillick was a college freshman in 1988 when she first met Scott Walker. It was spring semester, and she had just transferred to Marquette University. She was assigned a room in O’Donnell Hall (then a women’s dormitory), which she shared with her new roommate, Ruth (not her real name). Ruth was dating Scott Walker, who was 20 at the time, and, according to Bernadette, Ruth was deeply in love with him.
Midway through that spring semester, Bernadette alleges, Ruth found out she was pregnant. She informed her boyfriend, Scott, and initially he was supportive. That support changed to callous indifference for his girlfriend’s predicament after Scott informed his parents of the pregnancy.
Bernadette reports that at this point Scott began denying that he was the father of the baby, and when Ruth said she was considering an abortion, he claimed he didn’t care, as he wasn’t the father anyway.
Bernadette remembers being present when Ruth was dealing with the wrath of Scott’s mother, who allegedly admonished Ruth for trying to “ruin [her son's] reputation.”
“I supported her [Ruth] as he [Scott] went from encouraging her to get an abortion, to telling me it was in my best interest to keep my mouth shut, to denying that he was the father and having his own mother call her and tell her to stop erroneously accusing her son of paternity,” Bernadette recounts.
It was a “horrible time” for her friend. “Imagine her being 18 years old and pregnant, walking around Marquette’s Jesuit Catholic campus with her boyfriend denying he was the father,” says Bernadette.
How sad and desperate. Wisconsin Democrats should be embarrassed.
It took one call and about an hour to refute the bogus report.
The Daily Kos, not exactly a bastion of conservatism, reported on the developments.
The story that Scott Walker abandoned his pregnant girlfriend in college (dKos diary link) failed the first test of verification by a professional reporter. Daniel Bice, the “Watchdog” reporter of the Milwaukee Journal Sentinel Online interviewed the anonymous woman who had the baby, but she adamantly denied that Scott Walker was the father according to a comment by Daniel Bice to the linked story.
Daniel BiceJune 3, 2012 at 3:15 amReply
I am getting a lot of emails because of this post. Two things: (1) I tracked down and talked to Dr. Gillick’s freshman-year roommate at MU yesterday, and she adamantly denies that Walker is the father of her child. Yes, she got pregnant as a first-year student, but she believes Dr. Gillick is mixing up stories; and (2) I Can Read CCAP has taken a family court suit involving Scott Alan Walker and mixed it up with the governor, Scott Kevin Walker.
Another fail for the Wisconsin Democrats. What a bunch of losers.
Top Opinion
-
Reichstolz 2012/06/04 14:29:24
Later after the death threats rolled in, she claimed it was a different Scott Walker.
What a ironic thing 2 Scott Walkers that were both running for student body and also had the same DNA!
I feel bad for the taxpayers of Wisconsin, what a waste of money and an embarrassment as well.
From the outside it looks like "thugland" and "liarville" with the property destruction, threats and university sponsored doctors notes.
Wrong man!
Unfortunately robo calls are a part of election strategy for everyone, I just hang up and you can too.
or could you just have believed a pathetic excuse sent out by Walkers campaign?
which odds could be right?
"Helen, why didn't you write when you learnt you were pregnant?" he cried. "I would've rushed up here, we could've gotten married, & the baby would have my name!"
"Well," she said. "When my folks found out about my condition, we sat up all night thinking & talking, & we decided it would be better to have a bastard in the family than a republican."
You on the other hand are sitting here with sour grapes over a Governor who won his seat 2 times.
folks: this is the hallmark of political desperation. all they needed to do was to stir up a little confusion.
FWIW, he won by a big enough margin that any small number of robocalls didn't make any difference. voter fraud? it would have been interesting to know how many fake signatures were on those recall petitions. good thing the court wouldn't let anyone confirm all the signatures.
anyway. it doesn't matter. Walker won with a substantial margin.
see you in two years when he runs again and runs over his next opponent.
it was rhetorical comment for T to chew over.
i want to laugh now that the losers are complaining that they were 'outspent' by Walker and his supporter's PACs, yet they tried to cheat their way to victory in the first place by forging signatures on the recall petitions.
thanks for the link. interesting reading.
So to break you accusation down the odds are against you.
The only good thing about this story is that the voters of WI proved there is some sanity left in WI.
You know if you someone says something, it does not make it true.
True the vote 2012!
GORE..HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAH...