
B@stards
jere.chievres
2012/06/10 19:54:14
|
|
|||||
|
16 votes
|
|
36% | |||
|
5 votes
|
|
11% | |||
|
3 votes
|
|
7% | |||
|
21 votes
|
|
47% | |||
Read More: http://conservativebyte.com/2012/06/obama-administ...
Top Opinion
-
All of the above+18Obama & CAIR better get over the fact that THEIR racist a$$es are in OUR country, United States of America, and if they don't like it, they can take a hike right back to the sand dunes of their hellholes. Obama MUST GO!




















I'm beyond angry.
"Chelsea's Got Talent – Flacking for the Islamophobia Industry
by Joel Himelfarb
IPT News
June 12, 2012
http://www.investigativeproje...
Word is that former First Daughter Chelsea Clinton's career as an NBC special correspondent isn't going terribly well. Labeled the "Dork Diva" by one media blog, network officials complain about everything from her refusal to discuss growing up in the Clinton White House to what they consider her lack of story production (just a handful since starting there last year). "What's she giving us?" one NBC executive asked skeptically.
Many people think Chelsea will follow in the footsteps of parents Bill and Hillary and run for office if her television career implodes, but I disagree.
After watching her recent performance moderating a New York Jewish Community Center forum on "Islamophobia," it's apparent that mere election to Congress or some other public office wouldn't be the best use of Chelsea's talent.
But if she decided on a career as a public-relations spokesman for the "Islamophobia Industry," her growth potential would be limitless. When I refer to the Industry, I mean organizations like the Council on American-Islamic Relations (CAIR), the Muslim Public Affairs C...
"Chelsea's Got Talent – Flacking for the Islamophobia Industry
by Joel Himelfarb
IPT News
June 12, 2012
http://www.investigativeproje...
Word is that former First Daughter Chelsea Clinton's career as an NBC special correspondent isn't going terribly well. Labeled the "Dork Diva" by one media blog, network officials complain about everything from her refusal to discuss growing up in the Clinton White House to what they consider her lack of story production (just a handful since starting there last year). "What's she giving us?" one NBC executive asked skeptically.
Many people think Chelsea will follow in the footsteps of parents Bill and Hillary and run for office if her television career implodes, but I disagree.
After watching her recent performance moderating a New York Jewish Community Center forum on "Islamophobia," it's apparent that mere election to Congress or some other public office wouldn't be the best use of Chelsea's talent.
But if she decided on a career as a public-relations spokesman for the "Islamophobia Industry," her growth potential would be limitless. When I refer to the Industry, I mean organizations like the Council on American-Islamic Relations (CAIR), the Muslim Public Affairs Council (MPAC) and scores of like-minded groups that have proliferated across the United States during the past 20 years.
In general, these ideologues work to stifle legitimate debate by discrediting anyone who tries to point out the role of radical Islam in terrorism around the world or the radicalism in indoctrination centers and mosques like this, this, this and this as a bigot. The Industry also works to discredit successful prosecutions of jihadists seeking to attack the United States.
One weapon that has proven useful to the Industry is so-called "interfaith dialogue" involving Jewish and Islamic leaders. The Muslim participants tend to be Islamists, while their Jewish counterparts tend to be well-meaning "useful idiots" like Rabbi Marc Schneier, who has tried to establish a partnership with the Islamic Society of North America (ISNA), which is rooted in the Muslim Brotherhood. All too often, the result is a debacle in which the liberal Jews pine for dialogue while the Islamists stonewall and repeat anti-Semitic slanders....."
http://conservativebyte.com/2...
l leave it to liberal idiots to back their enemies and hat their friends
Thank you for your usual 'incite'......
But then your national bird is
You must be proud, although you do only seem to know what your social commie teachers have told you were "truths", biased left (tard). Sigh, you'll have a great experience of living life once you hit puberty. Probably, if you're not so "sexually confused" you only get hung up of the inappropriate conduct.
Here is what amounts to "genius" in Canadia....
Also oddly, the only known case of the Canadian Supreme Court striking down a “universal health care law" was the honor of Quebec Province, kudos Mr. (don’t) Know it all. Didn't they make "back to the future - the retrogression" based on French Canadian life?
truly subliminally programmed they are ...
then when you explain to them how they got hypnotized ,they get pissed ...and very offensive !
then the race / hate card comes out with claws shown !
GREAT POST JERE ...
And the MSM sits on it's collective butts and watches it happening.
Did you express concern when a movie was made about the assignation of a sitting president?
Or most recently leaking sensitive national defense secrets putting even you liberal lemmings at risk, which I don't really mind, unfortunately "good people" will pay for his treason.
Or as someone else put it....
"In legal terms this public statement "by the president" falls under the spirit and the letter of Article 2 Section 4 of the US Constitution...
Article 2 Section 4 reads precisely as stated below:
"The President, Vice President and all civil Officers of the United States, shall be removed from Office on Impeachment for, and Conviction of, Treason, Bribery, or other high Crimes and Misdemeanors."
The "president" is suspected of or known to have committed by certain federal officers of the courts, certain members of his cabinet or staff and certain members of congress all of the following high crimes as of today;
1)"threatening citizens of the United States with punitive economic action to extract material political support"
2)"bribery of federal officers and law enforcement agents in exchange for ...
Or most recently leaking sensitive national defense secrets putting even you liberal lemmings at risk, which I don't really mind, unfortunately "good people" will pay for his treason.
Or as someone else put it....
"In legal terms this public statement "by the president" falls under the spirit and the letter of Article 2 Section 4 of the US Constitution...
Article 2 Section 4 reads precisely as stated below:
"The President, Vice President and all civil Officers of the United States, shall be removed from Office on Impeachment for, and Conviction of, Treason, Bribery, or other high Crimes and Misdemeanors."
The "president" is suspected of or known to have committed by certain federal officers of the courts, certain members of his cabinet or staff and certain members of congress all of the following high crimes as of today;
1)"threatening citizens of the United States with punitive economic action to extract material political support"
2)"bribery of federal officers and law enforcement agents in exchange for testimony before courts of law"
3)"extortion paid to members of congress in exchange for votes in favor of specific legislation"
4)"abuse of power for personal financial and political gain"
5)"willful disregard of constitutionally mandated congressional evidentiary oversight subpoenas"
6)"high crimes via willful manipulation of constitutionally mandated reports to congress."
7)"willful disregard of the US Constitution's specific restraints on on the office of the president"
8)"Use of federal property for the purpose of campaign fundraising in violation of federal law via the Hatch Act of 1939." (The violations of the Hatch Act alone are far too numerous to adequately and fully list here)
9)"complicity in the murder of federal law enforcement officers through unlawful orders given to federal agents"
10)"treason by unlawful transfer of arms to known enemies of the United States later known to have been used to kill and injure US citizens and US federal law enforcement officers.
These actions alone absolutely demand immediate impeachment charges and proceedings.
Constitutionally speaking;
The 25th amendment should be immediately invoked by cabinet members aware of these high crimes to avoid federal prosecution of themselves for knowingly failing to act to prevent criminal acts committed in their presence by the President of The United States.
As a matter of federal criminal and constitutional law; all members of the federal government are legally mandated by "oath and affirmation" to report any crime "known to have taken place in their presence".
These charges barely scratches the surface of likely provable criminal activity by this president, congress should act immediately and so should member of the cabinet if they hold any regard for the law or the constitution... "