Boy Scouts affirm their ban of homosexuals, but allow the Muslim Brotherhood to partner with them. Which do you think poses the biggest threat to our society, homosexuals, or the Muslim Brotherhood and Sharia Law?
tncdel
2012/06/10 23:57:16
|
|
|||||
|
9 votes
|
|
18% | |||
|
42 votes
|
|
82% | |||
See reports here:
http://www.wnd.com/2011/10/352145/
http://www.upi.com/Top_News/US/2012/06/07/Boy-Scouts-uphold-b...
It makes no sense to me that the Boy Scouts on one hand ban homosexuals, but on the other hand not only allow a far greater threat, the Muslim Brotherhood, in the Boy Scouts, but are also even actively PARTNERING WITH them!
What kind of insanity is that?
http://www.wnd.com/2011/10/352145/
http://www.upi.com/Top_News/US/2012/06/07/Boy-Scouts-uphold-b...
It makes no sense to me that the Boy Scouts on one hand ban homosexuals, but on the other hand not only allow a far greater threat, the Muslim Brotherhood, in the Boy Scouts, but are also even actively PARTNERING WITH them!
What kind of insanity is that?
Top Opinion
-
CUDDLY BUT STILL CRABBY 2012/06/11 00:35:42NO, the Boy Scouts have lost all sense of perception in what constitutes a gr...





















& their two children.... BSA has been threatening & violating the dreams & ideals of Atheist & Gay Scouts for over 30 years ... adding Muslims to the preferred groups of hate makes Scouting a KKK organization 843-926-1750
your Hate Vomit is noted and will be the downfall of liberal progressive democrats this election year
During the 1980s and 1990s,several people attracted media attention when they sued the BSA, attempting to make them accept atheists as members and openly homosexual individuals in leadership positions. In 1981, Tim Curran, an openly homosexual former Scout, sued asking that he be accepted as an assistant Scoutmaster (see Curran v. Mount Diablo Council).[12] In 1991, twin brothers William and Michael Randall, who had refused to recite the "duty to God" portion of the Cub Scout Promise and Boy Scout Oath, sued to be allowed to continue in the program (see Randall v. Orange County Council and Welsh v. Boy Scouts of America). In addition, there were several other lawsuits involving essentially the same issues. Ultimately, the courts ruled in favor of the Boy Scouts of America in each case.
The courts have repeatedly held that the Boy Scouts of America, and all private organizations, have a right to set membership standards in accordance with the First Amendment protected concept of freedom of association.
Neither Gay or Atheist is a race or creed
I see no need for the Boy Scouts to have any "truck" with *either* homosexuals *or* the Muslim Brotherhood. They made a good decision on the first point, but a very *bad* decision on the second.
Spooky stuff!