Bowing to those who want to kill us
|
|
|||||
|
14 votes
|
|
82% | |||
|
2 votes
|
|
12% | |||
|
1 vote
|
|
6% | |||
Imagine for a moment, it is early
1942. Thousands of Americans are dead at Pearl Harbor. Japanese forces
are advancing and Germany is on the verge of controlling all of
Europe. Can you image members of congress calling for government
intervention to suppress anti-Nazi sentiment?
The equivalent of such idiocy is floating around the halls of Washington.
Congressman John Conyers, who is a poster
child for the concept of term limits, as well as Congressmen Andre
Carson and Hansen Clarke are circulating a letter asking for cosponsors
for a resolution demanding the government “counter anti-Muslim
sentiment.”
No, today is not April 1st.
According to these three anti-American
lunatics, about 20% of Americans have “negative feelings” towards
Muslims since the 9/11 attacks. Where do we begin with such lunacy?
First, as is typical of liberals, and all
three of these clowns are somewhere to the left of Karl Marx, no dissent
is permitted. You cannot disagree with the officially endorsed
thoughts of the progressive Democrat party. I guess these guys
nostalgically long for the days of the old Soviet Union when the
political commissars enforced ideological purity.
Why is there “anti-Muslim
sentiment?” Could it be because Islam is at war with America? Islam
and America are absolutely incompatible. Islam demands the creation of
a theocracy, with Islamic law being the Supreme Law of the Land. This
would supersede such things as freedom of speech, freedom of religion,
freedom of the press, freedom to associate and, well, freedom period.
Since 9/11 do you know how many Muslims
have been killed in retaliation for 9/11 in America? The answer is
one. He was killed by a white supremacist who shot two other people in
the following weeks. The shooter claimed his motivation for killing a
Muslim storekeeper was his outrage about 9/11.
How many attacks by Muslims have there been
since 9/11? A lot. We had the DC snipers. On July 4, 2002, a Muslim
man shot up the LAX airport, at the El Al ticket counter. In 2007, A
Muslim immigrant in Salt Lake City went on a rampage on Valentines Day,
killing 5. In 2009, Nadal Hasan, a Muslim terrorist who was in the
United States Army killed 14 at Ft. Hood. In 2007, six Muslims were
arrested for planning a terrorist attack on Ft. Dix in New Jersey. In
2009, an American born Muslim convert wanting to carry out jihad, shot
and killed one soldier at an Army recruiting station and seriously
wounded another. On December 25, 2009, the so-called underwear bomber
tried to blow up a Detroit bound jet. Of course, we cannot forget about
Richard Reid, the shoe bomber, in whose honor we all now have to take
off our shoes at airports.
This is just a short list of Islamic terror
visited upon America. This does not even count the plots, plans and
attempts. Nor does it count incidents that are disputed whether they
are terrorist attacks, such as Islamic honor killings.
The New York Times/CBS poll that Conyers
cites in his letter, if anything under represents the number of
Americans who understand who the enemy is.
As for Conyers, Carson and Clarke, there is a word for them. Dhimmitude. If you are not familiar with the word, look it up.
Top Opinion
-
JoeBtfsplk 2011/05/29 16:55:42Please leave your comment+8Idiocy and politically correct attitudes are killing what is left of America. The left want's to cozy up to extremist lunatics to achieve the goals that Obama/Soros have in store for the rest of us is beyond the pale.
Dhimmitude is alive in the minds of Conyers/Carson/Clarke -
Does the letter "C" have something to do with this travesty?
Or should we just label them the "C" word - - - COWARDS?

















lmao !
Dhimmitude: the Islamic system of governing populations conquered by jihad wars, encompassing all of the demographic, ethnic, and religious aspects of the political system. The word "dhimmitude" as a historical concept, was coined by Bat Ye'or in 1983 to describe the legal and social conditions of Jews and Christians subjected to Islamic rule. The word "dhimmitude" comes from dhimmi, an Arabic word meaning "protected". Dhimmi was the name applied by the Arab-Muslim conquerors to indigenous non-Muslim populations who surrendered by a treaty (dhimma) to Muslim domination. Islamic conquests expanded over vast territories in Africa, Europe and Asia, for over a millennium (638-1683). The Muslim empire incorporated numerous varied peoples which had their own religion, culture, language and civilization. For centuries, these indigenous, pre-Islamic peoples constituted the great majority of the population of the Islamic lands. Although these populations differed, they were ruled by the same type of laws, based on the shari'a.
This similarity, which includes also regional variations, has created a uniform civilization developed throughout the centuries by all non-Muslim indigenous people, who were vanquished by a jihad-war and govern...
Dhimmitude: the Islamic system of governing populations conquered by jihad wars, encompassing all of the demographic, ethnic, and religious aspects of the political system. The word "dhimmitude" as a historical concept, was coined by Bat Ye'or in 1983 to describe the legal and social conditions of Jews and Christians subjected to Islamic rule. The word "dhimmitude" comes from dhimmi, an Arabic word meaning "protected". Dhimmi was the name applied by the Arab-Muslim conquerors to indigenous non-Muslim populations who surrendered by a treaty (dhimma) to Muslim domination. Islamic conquests expanded over vast territories in Africa, Europe and Asia, for over a millennium (638-1683). The Muslim empire incorporated numerous varied peoples which had their own religion, culture, language and civilization. For centuries, these indigenous, pre-Islamic peoples constituted the great majority of the population of the Islamic lands. Although these populations differed, they were ruled by the same type of laws, based on the shari'a.
This similarity, which includes also regional variations, has created a uniform civilization developed throughout the centuries by all non-Muslim indigenous people, who were vanquished by a jihad-war and governed by shari'a law. It is this civilization which is called dhimmitude. It is characterized by the different strategies developed by each dhimmi group to survive as non-Muslim entity in their Islamized countries. Dhimmitude is not exclusively concerned with Muslim history and civilization. Rather it investigates the history of those non-Muslim peoples conquered and colonized by jihad.
Dhimmitude encompasses the relationship of Muslims and non-Muslims at the theological, social, political and economical levels. It also incorporates the relationship between the numerous ethno-religious dhimmi groups and the type of mentality that they have developed out of their particular historical condition which lasted for centuries, even in some Muslim countries, till today.
Dhimmitude is an entire integrated system, based on Islamic theology. It cannot be judged from the circumstantial position of any one community, at a given time and in a given place. Dhimmitude must be appraised according to its laws and customs, irrespectively of circumstances and political contingencies.
For books by Bat Ye'or, see www.dhimmi.org
Thank you for commenting.
So, when can we expect to see a resolution demanding the government 'counter anti-white sentiments'?
Doesn't our Congress have bigger things to worry about right now?
Dhimmitude is alive in the minds of Conyers/Carson/Clarke -
Does the letter "C" have something to do with this travesty?
Or should we just label them the "C" word - - - COWARDS?
It upsets me to hear that muslims do not have to submit to airport security pat downs...when it is in fact, if it hadn't of been for the muslims ..WE wouldn't have to be subjected to this treatment.
WE have to understand them. WE have to help them. WE have to cave in to their demands! Here and abroad! I say NO. Our brave military men and women,voluntarily, have sacrificed their ALL for US, Americans, for the United States Of America! To be free. To live within the guidelines of OUR Constitution.