Bloomberg supports gun control from behind a team of armed guards | Should Bloomberg disarm his security?
Heisenberg
2013/01/28 18:02:13
|
|
|||||
|
72 votes
|
|
86% | |||
|
12 votes
|
|
14% | |||
In the video, Bloomberg is seen surrounded by security. Mattera approaches Bloomberg and asks, “In the spirit of gun control, will you disarm your entire security team?”
Bloomberg’s reply: “Uh, you, we’ll get right back to you.”
“Why can you defend yourself but not the majority of Americans?” Mattera asks as the mayor walks away. “Look at the team of security you’ve got. And you’re an advocate for gun control?”
The video then cuts to Mattera walking further down the street when one of the men guarding Bloomberg, identified as Officer Stockton NYPD, stops Mattera and asks to see his photo ID.
Ladies and Gentlemen.. Feinstein introduces one of the most sweeping gun control laws since 1968 and IMMEDIATELY Exempts Politicians from the restrictions..
What we have here is another form of ROYALTY being created by these elites..
We aleady WORK for them but I guess that THAT just isn't good enough anymore.. NOW we have o DIE on the streets of America for them as well..
Why are YOU placing different values on the lives of human beings based on social standing??
MUCH as I studied the wording of the FIRST Amendment to TRY to discover the rationale ( and VALIDATION ) behind your contentions,, I can't find the words " The right of SECURITY Guards to keep and bear arms shall NOT be infringed " anywhere in the First Amendment..
Seems to ME that the Gun Control advocates like Bloomberg are trying to reword the First Amendment without doing the work.. And they're doing so in the way that would more closely folloe the mentality of HITLER rather then Jefferson..
Capisce??
Now.. THAT doesn't mean that Professionals don't HAVE that right but it sure as HELL don't mean that they have MORE of a right to it then anybody else ei9ther..
Don't BOTHER capiscing.. It already appears to be beyond that..
Guess what? Even if they face threats more often than me, if carrying a gun only saves me once - then it f***ing saved me!
I would IMAGINE that,, given the letest crime statistics,, the average Citizen on the streets of a city like CHicago is probably in FAR MORE danger then Barack Hussein Obama is on a GOLF COurse..
HITLER had the SAME concerns..
They are hired to try to deal with these threats, and to run towards them, instead of away from them!
You are wrong!
They have the EXACT SAME threats that face everyone else.
They are supposed to face those threats all the time - as that is their only job - but the threats are no worse to a guard than the threats are to the people of the US, who have the right to keep and bear arms.
You're wrong.
If the threats were no higher than normal, there would be no need to pay for guards. For example: The United States would have no need for Fort Knox, because our gold would be safe without such security.
That's right - the threats that the people face are EXACTLY THE SAME THREATS that the guards face!
The people are not always in the danger zone, but the guards are. The guards may be less safe because they are guards, and they may need their gun more often, but people needing their gun LESS often does not mean that they don't need it!
You are factually wrong in your first post when you said that I had an active imagination for stating fact!
Right. That's my point.
ARMS are NECESSARY TO THE SECURITY OF A FREE STATE - and my rights will never end where your feelings begin.
HE GAY!!!!