Blatant Racism! AND, WHAT DO YOU THINK?
What do you
think would have happened IF a Caucasian president had
ever produced and published a You Tube video for ALL
WHITE PEOPLE to unite for a WHITE
PRESIDENT.
Seriously, what
do you think would have happened?
WHOSE PRESIDENT IS
HE?
THIS IS A DANGEROUS VIDEO.
Obama
announces the 2012 launch of African Americans for
Obama.
This is what
racism smells like. It can't be explained
away.
Would you vote for a white person who did
this?
Can you
imagine Romney putting out a call for all the white
brothers and sisters to vote for him because he's
white.
If this video
is not alarming to you,something's not right with your brain.
| | |
Read More:
http://youtu.be/BdjoHA5ocwU
SS?N #: No. SS has verified his SS number and Snopes.com has debunked this.
Fake birth certificate: No. Hawaii has verified his birth certificate, politifact.com and Snopes.com and other entities have all debunked this.
Marxist: No. He has not advocated for the confiscation of all property and wealth with equal distribution to all citizens. Nor has he voiced adherence to the idea, from each according to ability and to each according to need.
Hate America: No. Those that say this say it because they say it of anyone whose opinions do parallel theirs. That is the truly unAmerican view.
Narcissist: No. I doubt any one can come up with any evidence of this beyond the fact that every politician trumpets his achievements and points out the flaws in his opponent's behaviors. In...
SS?N #: No. SS has verified his SS number and Snopes.com has debunked this.
Fake birth certificate: No. Hawaii has verified his birth certificate, politifact.com and Snopes.com and other entities have all debunked this.
Marxist: No. He has not advocated for the confiscation of all property and wealth with equal distribution to all citizens. Nor has he voiced adherence to the idea, from each according to ability and to each according to need.
Hate America: No. Those that say this say it because they say it of anyone whose opinions do parallel theirs. That is the truly unAmerican view.
Narcissist: No. I doubt any one can come up with any evidence of this beyond the fact that every politician trumpets his achievements and points out the flaws in his opponent's behaviors. Including Romney.
Homosexual: No. I doubt anyone can come up with any evidence of this and plenty of evidence that he engages in the heterosexual lifestyle.
Evil: NO. Again, that is the attitude of those whose opinions differ from his. He has a vision he believes is best for the country. That someone with a differing opinion calls him evil is meaningless. And he has done much to make life better for many: ACA, the stimulus, etc.
Mentally ill: No. Again, that is a favorite canard of those who disagree with him. He hasn't demonstrated any of the symptoms of mental illness such as talking to himself or invisible friends or responding to voices in his head, for example.
All of the above are the attempts of people who either disagree with his policies or have other reasons for a vicious level of hatred toward him to demonize him with code words most likely to appeal to an ignorant public.
Obama is no danger to America, The real danger is having mentally ill and maladjusted adults teach this vulgar Anti-American nonsense to their children. to be as hateful and racists like you!
Obama is NOT Anti-American, how would an anti-american become or want to become the president? makes no sense. Funny that the racist right langauge fits the description of Anti-American!
NO Doubt about it: Right-wing America hates having a Black Man as President!
2. Irrational - subjective - DELETED!
3. Racist - CORRECT! Racism is defined as anytime a conservative disagrees with a liberal minority.
4. Tea Bag Republicans? Name-calling in general is a sign of intellectual deficiencies. Why am I not surprised? (FYI: The Tea Party is named after an incident in our history, an incident of opposition to tyranny.)
5. African American? No, he's an American of African Heritage with strong suspicions of not having proper papers. How can one be a foreign student and then be a "natural born" citizen? The term is both ambiguous and limiting, so much so that it's almost synonymous with reverse racism. "I'm not African American, I'm an American who's black - I've only been to Africa a couple of times and I was born here." (Herman Cain)
6. Strikingly similar? Strikingly similar to racist southerners because I disagree with the man and tell the truth? "There you go again." (Reagan) ...playing the race card.
7. SSN - he has a Connecticut # or so we're told. Snopes is hardly a verifiable source - it has liberal leanings. I've heard this about the...
2. Irrational - subjective - DELETED!
3. Racist - CORRECT! Racism is defined as anytime a conservative disagrees with a liberal minority.
4. Tea Bag Republicans? Name-calling in general is a sign of intellectual deficiencies. Why am I not surprised? (FYI: The Tea Party is named after an incident in our history, an incident of opposition to tyranny.)
5. African American? No, he's an American of African Heritage with strong suspicions of not having proper papers. How can one be a foreign student and then be a "natural born" citizen? The term is both ambiguous and limiting, so much so that it's almost synonymous with reverse racism. "I'm not African American, I'm an American who's black - I've only been to Africa a couple of times and I was born here." (Herman Cain)
6. Strikingly similar? Strikingly similar to racist southerners because I disagree with the man and tell the truth? "There you go again." (Reagan) ...playing the race card.
7. SSN - he has a Connecticut # or so we're told. Snopes is hardly a verifiable source - it has liberal leanings. I've heard this about the Connecticut thing, but I didn't bring it up - you did.
8. Again, using Snopes and Politifact - BOTH liberal leaning websites as absolute truth - well, you're more ignorant than I thought. The birth certificate that Obama produced has already been debunked as fake. We await real proof. We've never gotten it. Say, where's his grades from anyone of the fine institutions he attended. We've seen Mitt's.
9. Marxist? Wrong again - he's a tax and spend Democrat an FDR Keynesian - what do you think excessive taxes are? By pure definition his redistribution is marxist/socialist tactics. His pure behavior is fascist. (Sowell)
10. In his own words he seeks to change America from its foundation principles, from its core. He does hate my America.
11. Narcissist? If you can't see it, you can't see it. But evidence? It's subjectivity. I see it you don't, I see the duck, you don't.
12. You are ridiculous - straight out of the George Soros handbook! Enough already.
De rien (no I don't speak French..i looked it up LOL)