Dr. King is one of my heroes. He gave his life for his people to achieve equality and dreamed of a better America for his children. To this day, his "I have a dream" speech still gives me chills.
Some people compare the two movements and claim that they are the same. They claim that the ultimate goal of both is equality and non-discrimination. While blacks were fighting off police dogs and water hoses, gays also had to overcome adversity because of their "sexual orientation"
There are others who disagree and say that the "gay lifestyle" did not keep any white persons from voting or having the same rights. They add the "gay rights struggle" cannot be compared to the struggle for Black Americans to be treated as whites.
So, what do you think? Is it the same? Is it not the same, why?
Well you're assuming too much because I never implied that. hence why I said we were on the same side(meaning we both think discrimination is wrong). I was simply stating there are different kinds of discrimination.
I actually think that they are really similar the fight equality. Personally the only differences I see is that its easier to hide the fact that you are gay than to hide the fact that you are black.
I AM NOT BLACK, I KNOW AND LOVE SO MANY BLACKS WHO HAVE WORKED AND STRUGGLED SO LONG FOR THE RESPECT THEY HAVE TODAY. IT TRIVIALIZES ALL THEY HAVE ACCOMPLISHED TO REDUCE TO COMPARING WITH "GAY RIGHTS". I HOPE THIS WILL NOT BE PUSHED TO SAY THEY ARE THE SAME.
NO THEY ARE NOT AND DON'T LET PEOPLE PULL YOU IN BY EXTENSION...THIS IS THE SAME AS XYZ...YOU DO NOT HAVE TO ACCEPT THEIR PREMISES...YES I DID HAVE A DEBATE SCHOLARSHIP....
What do you mean other than scope? That is the difference. Discrimination based on race was inseparable from living in the south during Jim Crow. Today, Gays aren't sent to separate but equal schools or have to drink from gay water fountains. You can hide being gay. You can't hide being black. That's the difference. It's like saying all discrimination is equivalent regardless of scope. It's not.
perhaps closer to suffrage since it does not have the historical depth
however I fail to see how anyone who has been on the other side of bigotry, would not want to help anyone else fight it
Ha! Ole Al never passes up a media opportunity, even if only valid in his mind. We certainly don't leave it to Al Sharpton to establish what are or are not real racial issues.
I wouldn't say exactly the same black people had to face more open prejudice because you can't hide your skin color but they are very similar movements because the goals of both groups are to end discrimination and have equal civil rights it's why I support them because I'm for equal treatment.
At the heart of every civil rights issue I feel the intent is same: equal and fair treatment for all regardless. Can one groups fight be compared to anothers even if the intent is the same at it's core? I don't believe so. It is a different fight, different groups, differnt issues, and different hopeful outcomes. I guess I'm somewhere in the middle.
You didnt say it, you wrote it. Perhaps you should be the one reading what you write.
There is no sides to the matter. There is only One United States constitution.
The Constitution put this all in motion it has just taken us generations to get to this point.
however I fail to see how anyone who has been on the other side of bigotry, would not want to help anyone else fight it