BIRTHERS 0 - CONSTITUTION 54

by ὤTṻnde΄ӂ Posted 2012/02/14 00:00:02

Related Topics: Constitution, Birther, Birthers

Read More

Read all 21 opinions

http://fwd4.me/0tku
The Constitution will continue to win.

Zuggi 2012/02/14 00:05:05

+5
I thought the Constitution was up to 90 by now.
>> See Replies

More polls by ὤTṻnde΄ӂ

unclepat 2012/02/14 10:17:49

+1
Entering the ninth inning, the Constitution is pretty much pitching a no-hitter. Then again, I expected no less when the constitution is facing the political equivalent of the freakin' Bad News Bears! lol

reply
rustyshackelford 2012/02/14 04:38:51
ὤTṻnde΄ӂ to rustysh... 2012/02/14 17:11:59

If he shouldn't be allowed, then you definitely shouldn't be allowed. He was born here, what's your excuse?

reply
rustysh... to ὤTṻnde΄ӂ 2012/02/16 19:39:28
chgo 2012/02/14 02:16:01

+3
Theses birther dunces live in their own little bubbles and make up their own facts. And their "facts" consists of 100% emotional, fear-based appeals without a rational basis or reality.

reply
Alvin 2012/02/14 01:18:26

+3
They will keep on arguing about it and bringing up frivolous lawsuits well after the end of his second term.

reply
reasontolive 2012/02/14 00:57:39

+4
It is higher than that.

http://tesibria.typepad.com/w...

reply
ὤTṻnde΄ӂ to reasont... 2012/02/14 01:13:50 (edited)

+5
You're right. I went back to the site and it was from 2009. There are a hell of a lot more cases since then. My bad.
You gave a link to the same chart I linked to.

reply
Z 2012/02/14 00:30:36

Why are there still this many pending? I get Texas, but why is Maryland not already dealt with?

reply
ὤTṻnde΄ӂ to Z 2012/02/14 00:36:30

+1
None on this list are pending (or you're talking about administrative judges in which Georgia was one of them and that was dismissed.) I know articles keep listing Arizona as a state with an eligibility challenge but the senate vetoed it. It was vetoed like 5 other immigration bills were defeated.

reply
Z to ὤTṻnde΄ӂ 2012/02/14 00:38:15

The link he posted showed that there were atleast 5 cases still pending.

reply
ὤTṻnde΄ӂ to Z 2012/02/14 00:43:33

Read the notes below each page.

reply
ὤTṻnde΄ӂ to Z 2012/02/14 00:56:41

Okay, I went back again. The post about 0 - 54 was from 2009, now I have to go find an update because there are clearly more lawsuits. This is where I got the info: http://fwd4.me/0tlO

reply
ὤTṻnde΄ӂ to Z 2012/02/14 00:43:05

It is explained right below it.

reply
Z to ὤTṻnde΄ӂ 2012/02/14 00:46:45

+1
Ah, I see now. It loaded wrong the first time, and was to small to see those.

reply
keymanjim 2012/02/14 00:07:46

For the Constitution to win the 'birthers' must win.
Until then, we all lose.

reply
ὤTṻnde΄ӂ to keymanjim 2012/02/14 00:22:31

+1

reply
unclepat to keymanjim 2012/02/14 10:20:11

Lemme guess? You must be for leagalizing marijuana with that logic, huh? lol

reply
Zuggi 2012/02/14 00:05:05

+5
I thought the Constitution was up to 90 by now.

reply
ὤTṻnde΄ӂ to Zuggi 2012/02/14 00:50:55 (edited)

+2
You know what, I think you're right.
Trial / Original Court total cases 99, birthers win 0, 8 pending
Appeals Court 54, birthers 0, Constitution 53
Total Supreme Court Rulings 16, birthers 0, pending 0
This is the website I got all of this from http://fwd4.me/0tlO

I just looked, this post was made in '09. I'm looking for more info.

reply
NPC 2012/02/14 00:04:50

The Democrats 10 States, The TEA party, Independents, Republicans 40 States

reply